Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
ORL lead DET lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
DET 2P — 3P —
ORL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 174 attempts

DET DET Shot-making Δ

Cunningham Hard 7/23 -5.5
Harris 8/17 -1.6
Duren Open 5/8 +0.2
Robinson Hard 2/8 -2.8
Thompson 2/8 -4.8
Jenkins Hard 1/6 -4.1
Stewart Open 3/4 +1.9
Green 2/4 +0.2
LeVert 1/4 -2.7

ORL ORL Shot-making Δ

Bane Hard 7/18 -0.1
Banchero 4/18 -9.5
Wagner 7/15 -1.7
Suggs Hard 1/13 -11.4
Cain Open 4/8 -2.4
Carter Jr. Open 3/8 -3.4
da Silva Hard 2/4 +0.9
Black 1/4 -1.7
Bitadze Open 1/4 -2.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DET
ORL
31/82 Field Goals 30/92
37.8% Field Goal % 32.6%
6/30 3-Pointers 9/35
20.0% 3-Point % 25.7%
20/28 Free Throws 25/34
71.4% Free Throw % 73.5%
46.6% True Shooting % 43.9%
63 Total Rebounds 69
12 Offensive 16
37 Defensive 36
18 Assists 15
0.90 Assist/TO Ratio 1.25
20 Turnovers 10
5 Steals 8
18 Blocks 6
29 Fouls 25
44 Points in Paint 34
11 Fast Break Pts 13
11 Points off TOs 23
11 Second Chance Pts 16
18 Bench Points 18
10 Largest Lead 12
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Franz Wagner
19 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 24.2 MIN
+24.21
2
Tobias Harris
20 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 34.8 MIN
+12.29
3
Wendell Carter Jr.
12 PTS · 11 REB · 4 AST · 34.8 MIN
+11.51
4
Isaiah Stewart
8 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 17.2 MIN
+9.81
5
Desmond Bane
22 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 36.9 MIN
+9.3
6
Jalen Duren
12 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 30.8 MIN
+9.05
7
Jamal Cain
8 PTS · 9 REB · 0 AST · 23.7 MIN
+7.28
8
Tristan da Silva
6 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 13.7 MIN
+5.92
9
Paolo Banchero
18 PTS · 8 REB · 4 AST · 40.0 MIN
+5.86
10
Javonte Green
5 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 16.5 MIN
+5.85
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 I. Stewart tip Layup (8 PTS) 88–94
Q4 0:04 I. Stewart REBOUND (Off:3 Def:0) 86–94
Q4 0:06 MISS C. Cunningham running pullup 3PT 86–94
Q4 0:10 C. Cunningham REBOUND (Off:0 Def:9) 86–94
Q4 0:11 MISS W. Carter Jr. Free Throw 2 of 2 86–94
Q4 0:11 TEAM offensive REBOUND 86–94
Q4 0:11 MISS W. Carter Jr. Free Throw 1 of 2 86–94
Q4 0:11 C. Cunningham take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Carter Jr. 2 FT) 86–94
Q4 0:13 W. Carter Jr. REBOUND (Off:5 Def:6) 86–94
Q4 0:15 MISS D. Robinson 32' pullup 3PT 86–94
Q4 0:21 J. Suggs Free Throw 2 of 2 (5 PTS) 86–94
Q4 0:21 J. Suggs Free Throw 1 of 2 (4 PTS) 86–93
Q4 0:21 I. Stewart loose ball personal FOUL (4 PF) (Suggs 2 FT) 86–92
Q4 0:21 TEAM defensive REBOUND 86–92
Q4 0:21 MISS C. LeVert 24' 3PT 86–92

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ORL Orlando Magic
S Paolo Banchero 40.0m
18
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.8

Paolo Banchero endured a nightmare shooting performance, clanking his way to a 4-of-18 mark from the field while missing all four of his deep attempts. Despite the offensive struggles, he salvaged his value on the other end by suffocating his matchups (4-of-12 shooting) to earn a solid +5.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 4/18 (22.2%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 10/13 (76.9%)
Advanced
TS% 37.9%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg +9.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +2.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Desmond Bane 36.9m
22
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.4

Desmond Bane provided crucial floor spacing, drilling 5-of-10 from beyond the arc to offset his otherwise inefficient 7-of-18 overall shooting night and secure a +10.0 Offense credit. He also locked down his individual assignments, limiting opponents to just 2-of-8 shooting when operating as the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg +18.8
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jalen Suggs 35.4m
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-16.5

Jalen Suggs suffered through a catastrophic shooting slump, missing 12 of his 13 attempts (including 1-of-11 from deep) to generate a brutal -9.7 Offense credit. While his active hands yielded 4 deflections and 2 steals, his primary matchups routinely exploited him, shooting a blistering 10-of-17 from the field.

Shooting
FG 1/13 (7.7%)
3PT 1/11 (9.1%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 18.0%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg +21.3
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring -5.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
12
pts
11
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.2

Wendell Carter Jr. anchored the interior with relentless physicality, contesting 13 shots and holding his matchups to a dismal 4-of-15 shooting clip for a +5.8 Defense credit. He complemented his rim protection with excellent connective passing and screen-setting, driving a robust +12.1 Offense credit despite low shooting volume.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +21.5
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +13.0
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Franz Wagner 24.2m
19
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+23.3

Franz Wagner orchestrated a brilliant two-way performance, driving a massive +16.2 Offense credit through efficient scoring and flawless ball security (zero turnovers). He was equally disruptive off the ball, racking up 4 steals to fuel a stellar +10.6 Defense credit that blew the game open.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.7%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg +34.0
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +4.4
Defense +7.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
Jamal Cain 23.7m
8
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+9.6

Jamal Cain dominated the glass with 9 rebounds and scored efficiently (4-of-8) to generate a strong +8.5 Offense credit off the bench. He paired his offensive rebounding with stout isolation defense, stifling his matchups into a 3-of-10 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg -18.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +11.4
Defense -1.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

Anthony Black was highly effective as an on-ball pest, holding his matchups to a stifling 1-of-5 shooting clip during his rotation minutes. However, his offensive passivity and poor finishing (1-of-4 shooting) resulted in a -0.3 Offense credit, severely limiting his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg -54.3
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.3

Tristan da Silva played a clean, low-mistake game, converting half his shots and committing zero turnovers to secure a +5.8 Offense credit. His minimal defensive engagement (just one contest) kept his overall footprint small, though he executed his limited offensive role effectively.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -18.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Goga Bitadze 13.2m
2
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.4

Goga Bitadze protected the rim with two blocks and seven contests, but his primary matchups frequently scored over him (6-of-10 shooting). His offensive contributions were minimal (1-of-4 shooting), though his flawless ball security helped him squeeze out a +3.9 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 22.5%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -36.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +7.6
Defense -3.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 38.9m
25
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
-6.3

Cade Cunningham endured a brutal offensive night, forcing up 23 shots to get his 25 points while hemorrhaging value through 8 turnovers to post a -0.4 Offense credit. Despite the offensive struggles, he remained highly engaged on the other end, utilizing 13 contests to stifle his matchups (7-of-23 shooting) and earn a +5.0 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 7/23 (30.4%)
3PT 3/11 (27.3%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.6%
USG% 38.0%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +3.8
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +2.7
Defense -4.3
Turnovers -19.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 30.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 8
S Tobias Harris 34.8m
20
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.5

Tobias Harris operated as an effective scoring engine inside the arc, generating a +10.6 Offense credit despite completely misfiring from deep (0-of-5). He complemented his interior scoring with solid matchup defense, holding his primary assignments to 5-of-12 shooting to chip in a +3.7 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -12.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +12.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Ausar Thompson 32.0m
6
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.9

Ausar Thompson's relentless motor kept him afloat defensively, highlighted by 10 contests and 4 deflections that fueled a +5.2 Hustle credit. However, his offensive limitations were glaring as he struggled to convert (2-of-8 shooting), capping his overall effectiveness despite the high-energy peripheral contributions.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -22.3
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +9.5
Defense +2.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jalen Duren 30.8m
12
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.3

Jalen Duren scored efficiently around the rim (5-of-8) to post a solid +9.7 Offense credit, but his overall volume took a noticeable hit compared to his usual production. His ball security was a glaring issue, as 4 turnovers (above his 2.7 average) disrupted offensive flow and limited his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +9.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -10.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Duncan Robinson 29.0m
7
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

Duncan Robinson's value plummeted as his perimeter touch completely abandoned him, resulting in a frigid 1-of-6 showing from beyond the arc. Without his gravity bending the defense, his meager +0.3 Offense credit reflected a night where he was largely invisible on that end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.4%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -26.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Caris LeVert 24.7m
2
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.2

Caris LeVert completely locked down his assignments, suffocating opponents into a dismal 1-of-12 shooting performance to drive a +3.8 Defense credit. However, his offensive rhythm was non-existent, as he managed just two points on four shots, resulting in a -2.8 Offense credit that dragged down his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg +23.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 8.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
8
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.9

Isaiah Stewart was an absolute terror protecting the paint, swatting an incredible 8 shots and contesting 16 more to anchor a dominant +5.4 Defense credit. He paired this rim-enforcement with hyper-efficient finishing (3-of-4 shooting) to generate a robust +7.5 Offense credit in just 17 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +18.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 8
TO 2
5
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Javonte Green provided a gritty spark off the bench, anchoring his value in lockdown isolation defense by holding his matchups to a stifling 1-of-5 shooting. His low-usage efficiency and pair of blocks helped generate a balanced +3.2 Defense credit during his brief rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.3

Daniss Jenkins struggled mightily to find his scoring touch, missing all three of his perimeter attempts during a frigid 1-of-6 shooting night. While his playmaking (4 assists) kept his Offense credit slightly positive (+1.5), his inability to space the floor severely capped his second-unit utility.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 21.8%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +4.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.4m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Kevin Huerter was a complete ghost during his fleeting cameo, failing to attempt a single shot or record any meaningful box-score stats. His +0.3 Offense credit underscores a shift where he strictly operated as a floor-spacer without actually touching the ball.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +115.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0