GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 36.9m
31
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.2

Carried the offensive load with relentless drives and foul-drawing, completely dictating the game's tempo. Massive hustle metrics and loose-ball recoveries offset the fact that he was frequently targeted on defense.

Shooting
FG 10/23 (43.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 10/13 (76.9%)
Advanced
TS% 54.0%
USG% 35.3%
Net Rtg -24.9
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Offense +18.1
Hustle +14.9
Defense -1.9
Raw total +31.1
Avg player in 36.9m -20.9
Impact +10.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 73.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
15
pts
12
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.1

Traded his usual scoring punch for elite rebounding and physical interior defense. Banged in the trenches to secure crucial extra possessions, proving his value beyond just spacing the floor.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.2%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Offense +9.2
Hustle +6.0
Defense +6.5
Raw total +21.7
Avg player in 34.5m -19.6
Impact +2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S OG Anunoby 33.9m
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

Completely vanished from the offensive game plan, floating passively on the perimeter instead of cutting. Even his typically stellar wing defense could not make up for being a total non-factor on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.0%
USG% 9.6%
Net Rtg -2.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Offense +1.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +6.3
Raw total +9.5
Avg player in 33.9m -19.2
Impact -9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 28.0m
6
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.1

Forced several contested midrange pull-ups that derailed offensive possessions. Navigated screens well defensively, but his poor shot selection heavily dragged down his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -30.7
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.0m
Offense +2.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +4.4
Raw total +9.8
Avg player in 28.0m -15.9
Impact -6.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.7

Anchored the drop coverage effectively but was phased out offensively against a mobile frontcourt. Kept plays alive with timely tip-outs even when he was not getting touches around the basket.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 4.4%
Net Rtg -34.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Offense +8.7
Hustle +0.8
Defense +0.9
Raw total +10.4
Avg player in 17.2m -9.7
Impact +0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Hit timely shots but gave up too much ground on defensive closeouts. Opponents repeatedly attacked his side of the floor, mitigating his offensive resurgence.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 75.1%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Offense +9.1
Hustle +0.8
Defense +3.7
Raw total +13.6
Avg player in 27.1m -15.5
Impact -1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 35.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.3

Over-dribbled against the zone, resulting in stagnant offensive possessions and late-clock heaves. Aggressive ball pressure was a plus, but he struggled to organize the second unit effectively.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg -18.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.7m
Offense -1.0
Hustle +1.7
Defense +4.8
Raw total +5.5
Avg player in 20.7m -11.8
Impact -6.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
Josh Hart 18.0m
10
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.4

Short-circuited several transition opportunities by driving wildly into traffic. Chaotic energy resulted in poor spacing, even though he scrapped hard on the defensive glass.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.9%
USG% 30.2%
Net Rtg -40.7
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Offense +1.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.9
Raw total +5.9
Avg player in 18.0m -10.3
Impact -4.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.7

Injected immediate pace into the second unit with decisive downhill attacks. Avoided his usual turnover-prone habits, making smart reads off high pick-and-rolls.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Offense +2.2
Hustle +2.1
Defense +3.5
Raw total +7.8
Avg player in 10.6m -6.1
Impact +1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.7

Capitalized on a brief stint by setting bone-crushing screens and popping for open looks. Completely changed the physical tone of the game during his short run.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.4m
Offense +5.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.9
Raw total +9.8
Avg player in 5.4m -3.1
Impact +6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.1

Caught out of position on a late defensive rotation. Offered little resistance at the rim during the final minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.9m -1.1
Impact -1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.9

Executed the offense cleanly in garbage time, finding the right passing angles. Showed good poise against the press in his limited run.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Offense +2.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +2.0
Avg player in 1.9m -1.1
Impact +0.9
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.1

Looked lost on defensive switches during the closing stretch. Failed to box out, allowing a late second-chance opportunity that dinged his rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.9m -1.1
Impact -1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.6

Ran the floor hard in transition to secure an easy look at the basket. Kept the ball moving well in his brief appearance to maintain positive momentum.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 40.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Offense +1.6
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +1.6
Avg player in 1.9m -1.0
Impact +0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ORL Orlando Magic
S Franz Wagner 36.8m
28
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.3

Took over the primary creation role with relentless rim pressure that collapsed the defense. His elite positioning and constant off-ball movement completely overwhelmed his primary matchups.

Shooting
FG 10/22 (45.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.9%
USG% 28.3%
Net Rtg +26.9
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Offense +19.9
Hustle +4.7
Defense +10.6
Raw total +35.2
Avg player in 36.8m -20.9
Impact +14.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Desmond Bane 33.9m
22
pts
6
reb
8
ast
Impact
-1.0

High offensive usage was offset by costly defensive lapses on the perimeter. Allowed too many straight-line drives which compromised the entire defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.0%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg +16.4
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Offense +15.4
Hustle +2.3
Defense +0.6
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 33.9m -19.3
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
13
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.9

Gave back his efficient offensive production through poor pick-and-roll coverage that allowed easy floaters. Struggled to contain the paint defensively, negating his scoring entirely.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 81.3%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +9.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.7
Raw total +13.0
Avg player in 31.4m -17.9
Impact -4.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 36.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Jalen Suggs 26.4m
14
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.2

Settled for contested jumpers early in the shot clock instead of pressuring the rim. Point-of-attack defense remained solid, but the empty offensive possessions stalled out the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 55.4%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg +16.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Offense +7.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.2
Raw total +11.7
Avg player in 26.4m -14.9
Impact -3.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Paolo Banchero 12.0m
4
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.1

Left the game early, but anchored the defense in his limited minutes. Defensive rotations and weak-side help drove his positive impact before his exit.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +32.5
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.8
Raw total +8.0
Avg player in 12.0m -6.9
Impact +1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
17
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.0

Capitalized on defensive breakdowns with timely cuts and decisive baseline drives. Length on the perimeter suffocated opposing guards, driving a massive two-way impact.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 22.8%
Net Rtg +6.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Offense +12.6
Hustle +2.3
Defense +5.3
Raw total +20.2
Avg player in 23.1m -13.2
Impact +7.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
8
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.7

Hesitated on open catch-and-shoot looks, bogging down the half-court flow. Lacked his usual offensive aggression, allowing defenders to sag off and clog the driving lanes.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +42.6
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Offense +5.6
Hustle +1.9
Defense +1.5
Raw total +9.0
Avg player in 22.2m -12.7
Impact -3.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Completely neutralized by the opponent's switching scheme on offense, stalling out possessions. While his weak-side rim protection remained elite, his inability to stretch the floor allowed the defense to pack the paint.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.5%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -21.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.4m
Offense +0.7
Hustle +2.9
Defense +3.6
Raw total +7.2
Avg player in 16.4m -9.4
Impact -2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Goga Bitadze 16.2m
10
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.1

Dominated the interior with aggressive rim runs and hard screens that freed up shooters. Punished switches consistently in the post to maximize his short stint.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 107.8%
USG% 11.6%
Net Rtg +60.9
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Offense +9.6
Hustle +2.1
Defense +2.6
Raw total +14.3
Avg player in 16.2m -9.2
Impact +5.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Tyus Jones 13.0m
0
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.8

Made his mark entirely through disruptive hands and floor generalship despite a scoreless outing. Pushed the pace effectively and generated key deflections to spark transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.0m
Offense -0.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.5
Raw total +8.2
Avg player in 13.0m -7.4
Impact +0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.8

Provided a quick spark with confident perimeter spacing in garbage time. Stretched the floor effectively during his brief rotation to keep the offense flowing.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +3.4
Avg player in 4.7m -2.6
Impact +0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Noah Penda 1.9m
0
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.3

Burned on a few defensive rotations during his brief mop-up minutes. Failed to make a tangible impact in the closing stretch due to poor positioning.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Offense -0.2
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.9
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 1.9m -1.0
Impact -0.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Rushed a couple of offensive sets in the final moments, leading to disjointed spacing. Mostly invisible during the garbage-time sequence.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Offense +0.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.5
Avg player in 1.9m -1.1
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0