ORL

2025-26 Season

JALEN SUGGS

Orlando Magic | Guard | 6-5
Jalen Suggs
13.8 PPG
3.9 RPG
5.4 APG
27.4 MPG
+1.8 Impact

Suggs produces at an above average rate for a 27-minute workload. 2.7 turnovers per game cost 5.3 points of value nightly. Elite defensive value (+4.0/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.8
Scoring +8.2
Points 13.8 PPG × +1.00 = +13.8
Missed 2PT 2.2/g × -0.78 = -1.7
Missed 3PT 4.1/g × -0.87 = -3.6
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +4.0
Assists 5.4/g × +0.50 = +2.7
Off. Rebounds 1.0/g × +1.26 = +1.3
Turnovers -5.3
Turnovers 2.7/g × -1.95 = -5.3
Defense +4.0
Steals 1.9/g × +2.30 = +4.4
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 2.9/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.4
Contested Shots 3.3/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 3.4/g × +0.65 = +2.2
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.3/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.7
Raw Impact +15.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −13.5
Net Impact
+1.8
87th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 72th
13.8 PPG
Efficiency 72th
57.8% TS
Playmaking 85th
5.4 APG
Rebounding 73th
3.9 RPG
Rim Protection 93th
0.19/min
Hustle 94th
0.16/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 9th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jalen Suggs spent his first twenty games operating as a chaotic, two-way hurricane whose nightly value hinged entirely on his defensive discipline and shot selection. When he embraced his role as a gritty connector, he was brilliant. During the 11/25 vs PHI matchup, he scored just 4 points but posted a massive +8.0 impact by abandoning his own offense to become a pure defensive menace and an elite playmaker. Conversely, poor offensive decision-making could easily erase his defensive contributions despite respectable scoring totals. Look at the 12/07 vs NYK contest, where he poured in 17 points but suffered a -0.4 impact because a high volume of erratic perimeter shots completely neutralized his point-of-attack defense. Yet, when his outside shot actually fell in rhythm, he morphed into an absolute superstar. He shredded the Celtics on 11/09 vs BOS, logging 20 points and a towering +13.5 impact driven by suffocating defense and highly efficient scoring.

A maddening pendulum swing of erratic shot selection and defensive brilliance defined this chaotic stretch for Jalen Suggs. Even when his scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs often dragged his overall value into the gutter. During the 01/28 vs MIA matchup, he tallied 16 points but posted a dismal -7.8 impact score because his reckless 1-for-7 chucking from beyond the arc completely stalled out the offensive rhythm. Yet, when he dialed back the hero ball, his underlying value skyrocketed despite quiet scoring nights. He managed a mere 7 points on 02/09 vs MIL, but generated a stellar +10.6 impact by dismantling Milwaukee's offensive sets with suffocating ball pressure and dishing out 10 assists. When his decision-making finally caught up to his physical tools, the results were terrifying. He orchestrated an absolute masterclass on 02/05 vs BKN, logging 15 points, 11 rebounds, and 11 assists for a towering +18.9 impact fueled by flawless execution and relentless two-way hustle.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Suggs's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 46% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Suggs consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +2.9, second-half: +0.7. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 50 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Powell 64.8 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.31
PTS 20
C. Cunningham 54.4 poss
FG% 23.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
D. Fox 53.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.28
PTS 15
J. Brunson 50.8 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.47
PTS 24
D. Mitchell 46.9 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
M. Bridges 46.0 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 14
T. Young 38.9 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 19
J. Jaquez Jr. 38.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10
T. Herro 34.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 12
I. Collier 32.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Brunson 97.4 poss
FG% 58.6%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.46
PTS 45
N. Powell 71.3 poss
FG% 52.9%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.48
PTS 34
D. Fox 57.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 13
D. Mitchell 53.2 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 9
D. Mitchell 52.9 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
C. Cunningham 44.0 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 11
T. Young 41.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
T. Herro 41.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
M. Bridges 40.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
T. Harris 38.7 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

51
Games
13.8
PPG
3.9
RPG
5.4
APG
1.9
SPG
0.7
BPG
43.9
FG%
32.6
3P%
85.1
FT%
27.4
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played