BKN

2025-26 Season

ZIAIRE WILLIAMS

Brooklyn Nets | Forward | 6-9
Ziaire Williams
10.2 PPG
2.4 RPG
1.1 APG
22.9 MPG
+1.1 Impact

Williams produces at an above average rate for a 23-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.1
Scoring +6.1
Points 10.2 PPG × +1.00 = +10.2
Missed 2PT 1.5/g × -0.78 = -1.2
Missed 3PT 2.9/g × -0.87 = -2.5
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +1.4
Assists 1.1/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 1.1/g × -1.95 = -2.1
Defense +2.2
Steals 1.4/g × +2.30 = +3.2
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 1.8/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.7
Contested Shots 3.6/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 3.1/g × +0.65 = +2.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.3/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.7
Raw Impact +11.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
+1.1
65th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 58th
10.2 PPG
Efficiency 41th
55.6% TS
Playmaking 27th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 13th
2.4 RPG
Rim Protection 72th
0.17/min
Hustle 96th
0.16/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 51th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ziaire Williams spent his first 20 games oscillating wildly between lethal floor-spacer and total offensive black hole. When his jumper was falling, he looked like a premier bench weapon, as seen on 10/24 vs CLE when he dropped 25 points to generate a massive +15.3 impact score. That night, his lethal weak-side floor spacing punished defensive rotations and drove the offense. Yet, those peaks were frequently erased by nightmarish outings where his shot selection actively hurt the team. On 11/21 vs BOS, a complete lack of rhythm led to forced, low-quality perimeter shots that fueled opponent transition attacks, dragging him down to a brutal -16.3 impact. He occasionally found ways to salvage his value when the jumpers bricked, notably on 11/18 vs BOS. Despite a rough 4-for-11 shooting night in that contest, he managed a +3.8 impact by relying on sheer energy, defensive versatility, and timely hustle plays. Ultimately, Williams must stop settling for contested pull-ups and fully embrace his defensive tools if he wants to escape this frustrating inconsistency.

Extreme volatility defined Ziaire Williams during this erratic midseason stretch, oscillating wildly between two-way dominance and catastrophic offensive meltdowns. When his defensive engagement aligned with his jumper, he was a massive plus. He locked down the opposition on 01/01 vs HOU, racking up a +12.7 impact score fueled by elite weak-side rim protection and perfectly timed deflections. Yet, his shot selection often sabotaged his own team. On 01/23 vs BOS, he managed a respectable 14 points and 8 rebounds, but posted a brutal -8.9 impact score because he stubbornly launched 11 three-pointers, hitting just one and actively shooting his squad out of crucial possessions. The floor completely fell out on 02/19 vs CLE, where a 1-for-9 shooting night resulted in a disastrous -11.1 impact score as he repeatedly bricked open looks and killed offensive momentum. Williams clearly possesses the defensive length to swing games, but his maddening shot selection makes him a dangerous gamble on any given night.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Williams's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Williams consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +0.1, second-half: +2.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Bane 49.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Brunson 43.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
P. Pritchard 39.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
T. da Silva 38.3 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
J. Brown 32.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
K. Knueppel 31.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
Q. Grimes 30.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Holiday 28.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
A. Simons 28.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
G. Allen 27.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Bane 45.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
P. Pritchard 42.3 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
J. Harden 41.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
J. Brunson 38.1 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 14
D. Avdija 37.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
T. Maxey 37.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
A. Simons 35.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
Q. Grimes 34.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
L. Dončić 34.0 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.5
PTS 17
B. Ingram 32.9 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.46
PTS 15

SEASON STATS

56
Games
10.2
PPG
2.4
RPG
1.1
APG
1.4
SPG
0.4
BPG
42.5
FG%
34.3
3P%
85.0
FT%
22.9
MPG

GAME LOG

56 games played