Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BKN lead ORL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
ORL 2P — 3P —
BKN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 182 attempts

ORL ORL Shot-making Δ

Banchero 11/19 +3.4
Penda 5/15 -4.5
Carter Jr. 8/14 -0.3
Bane 4/14 -6.2
Black 2/11 -8.1
da Silva 6/10 +3.4
Bitadze Open 3/5 -0.8
Howard 1/4 -2.7
Jones Hard 1/3 +0.1
Isaac Open 0/1 -1.4

BKN BKN Shot-making Δ

Porter Jr. Hard 12/24 +5.9
Clowney 4/11 -3.8
Thomas Hard 3/11 -3.8
Dëmin Hard 5/9 +5.3
Williams Hard 2/6 -1.3
Wolf Open 2/6 -3.8
Powell 1/6 -5.3
Traore Hard 2/5 +0.7
Claxton Open 3/4 +0.6
Sharpe Open 2/4 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
ORL
BKN
41/96 Field Goals 36/86
42.7% Field Goal % 41.9%
9/33 3-Pointers 17/51
27.3% 3-Point % 33.3%
13/18 Free Throws 14/22
72.2% Free Throw % 63.6%
50.0% True Shooting % 53.8%
60 Total Rebounds 59
20 Offensive 14
35 Defensive 30
28 Assists 23
1.56 Assist/TO Ratio 1.10
18 Turnovers 19
12 Steals 11
4 Blocks 8
19 Fouls 18
54 Points in Paint 32
4 Fast Break Pts 7
21 Points off TOs 17
15 Second Chance Pts 21
26 Bench Points 31
18 Largest Lead 4
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Michael Porter Jr.
34 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 38.3 MIN
+21.34
2
Goga Bitadze
6 PTS · 10 REB · 1 AST · 13.5 MIN
+18.29
3
Tristan da Silva
14 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 23.5 MIN
+16.72
4
Wendell Carter Jr.
20 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 39.4 MIN
+15.49
5
Egor Dëmin
18 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 31.8 MIN
+15.14
6
Noah Penda
13 PTS · 11 REB · 1 AST · 31.3 MIN
+13.7
7
Paolo Banchero
30 PTS · 14 REB · 6 AST · 42.6 MIN
+13.29
8
Noah Clowney
10 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 33.5 MIN
+12.79
9
Tyus Jones
3 PTS · 1 REB · 5 AST · 17.3 MIN
+9.62
10
Danny Wolf
6 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 18.2 MIN
+8.98
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:00 P. Banchero 26' 3PT pullup bank (30 PTS) (A. Black 6 AST) 104–103
Q5 0:02 M. Porter Jr. personal FOUL (2 PF) 101–103
Q5 0:05 E. Dëmin 25' 3PT pullup bank (18 PTS) 101–103
Q5 0:16 W. Carter Jr. cutting DUNK (20 PTS) (P. Banchero 6 AST) 101–100
Q5 0:23 P. Banchero REBOUND (Off:2 Def:12) 99–100
Q5 0:27 MISS Z. Williams 3PT 99–100
Q5 0:46 Z. Williams REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 99–100
Q5 0:49 MISS D. Bane 3PT 99–100
Q5 1:07 E. Dëmin 27' 3PT pullup (15 PTS) 99–100
Q5 1:13 Z. Williams STEAL (2 STL) 99–97
Q5 1:13 A. Black lost ball TURNOVER (4 TO) 99–97
Q5 1:13 A. Black REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 99–97
Q5 1:19 MISS M. Porter Jr. 25' 3PT 99–97
Q5 1:31 TEAM defensive REBOUND 99–97
Q5 1:34 MISS D. Bane driving Layup 99–97

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BKN Brooklyn Nets
34
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+22.5

A barrage of perimeter jumpers stretched the opposing defense to its breaking point and dictated the entire flow of the game. His willingness to fire away off screens forced constant over-rotations, while surprisingly stout weak-side defense rounded out a dominant showing. The sheer volume of his outside shooting masked any minor defensive lapses.

Shooting
FG 12/24 (50.0%)
3PT 8/18 (44.4%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.3%
USG% 34.9%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +24.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +9.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense +6.5
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 5
S Noah Clowney 33.5m
10
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.1

Overcame a dreadful shooting night from beyond the arc by leaning heavily into his defensive fundamentals and hustle metrics. He consistently blew up pick-and-roll actions and fought for loose balls to keep possessions alive. A prime example of impacting winning without needing the jumper to fall.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 40.6%
USG% 16.2%
Net Rtg +20.9
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
S Egor Dëmin 31.8m
18
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+8.0

Punished defensive lapses with lethal spot-up shooting from deep, completely changing the geometry of the floor. His quick release on kick-outs made him a constant threat, while disciplined closeouts on the other end bolstered his defensive rating. A highly efficient, low-mistake performance that perfectly complemented the primary creators.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 80.4%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg +17.1
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Day'Ron Sharpe 29.9m
5
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.4

Anchored the interior with elite hustle and bruising screen-setting that freed up the guards on the perimeter. His defensive positioning deterred drives, though his limited offensive repertoire kept his overall impact modest. He did all the dirty work necessary to keep the second unit afloat.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +11.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -9.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Ziaire Williams 27.3m
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

A sharp drop-off in offensive aggression and poor perimeter execution severely limited his value tonight. He settled for contested, late-clock jumpers instead of attacking closeouts, stalling the offense's rhythm. Despite decent defensive effort, his inability to stretch the floor proved costly.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.3m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Cam Thomas 23.9m
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.5

Tunnel vision and a heavy diet of contested isolation jumpers torpedoed his offensive efficiency. By dominating the ball without converting, he allowed the opposing defense to set up in transition repeatedly. The lack of off-ball movement or secondary playmaking made his minutes a significant net negative.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.2%
USG% 28.1%
Net Rtg -27.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
Nic Claxton 23.1m
7
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.3

Played to a dead-even stalemate, providing standard rim protection but lacking his usual offensive rim-running gravity. Opponents successfully neutralized his lob threat, forcing him into a purely reactionary defensive role. Solid but unspectacular, failing to tilt the math in either direction.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.8%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -21.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
Nolan Traore 20.4m
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.8

Looked hesitant as a primary initiator, leading to stagnant possessions and a notable dip in his usual scoring punch. While he hit a couple of perimeter looks, his inability to break down his man off the dribble limited the offense's ceiling. Needs to apply more rim pressure to open up the floor for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -24.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Drake Powell 18.7m
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.8

Completely out of sync offensively, forcing rushed shots early in the clock that functioned as live-ball turnovers. His defensive impact was virtually non-existent, allowing straight-line drives to the basket without much physical resistance. A highly damaging shift characterized by poor decision-making and a lack of edge.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -29.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring -2.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Danny Wolf 18.2m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.0

Generated positive value through smart connective passing and sturdy post defense, masking his individual shooting struggles. He kept the ball moving against zone looks and rarely found himself out of position on switches. Proved that high-IQ positioning can salvage an otherwise cold shooting night.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -9.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.2m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 15.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
ORL Orlando Magic
S Paolo Banchero 42.6m
30
pts
14
reb
6
ast
Impact
+16.3

Massive offensive usage and excellent defensive metrics were heavily offset by hidden negatives, likely high turnovers or foul trouble, dragging his total impact down to near neutral. He bullied his way to the rim effectively but gave back value through sloppy transition defense following empty possessions. Still, his sheer physical presence anchored the frontcourt for heavy minutes.

Shooting
FG 11/19 (57.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg -6.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.6m
Scoring +24.3
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +13.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -21.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 9
20
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.9

Dominated the interior with high-level hustle and physical screen-setting that opened up driving lanes for the guards. While his perimeter jumper failed to connect, his relentless work on the glass and paint efficiency kept his overall rating firmly in the green. He maintained a stellar streak of high-percentage finishing inside the arc by strictly taking what the defense conceded.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.7%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.4m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Anthony Black 37.4m
5
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-15.1

Elite point-of-attack defense was entirely overshadowed by a disastrous offensive showing. He routinely stalled half-court sets by passing up open looks or forcing low-percentage drives into heavy traffic. The defensive intensity is real, but the offensive execution bled points and killed spacing.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 22.7%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -1.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Scoring -2.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Desmond Bane 35.4m
9
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.3

A brutal shooting slump completely tanked his overall value despite respectable defensive metrics. Forcing contested looks from deep derailed offensive momentum and led to long rebounds that fueled opponent fast breaks. His effort on the margins simply couldn't salvage the damage done by a high volume of empty possessions.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 32.1%
USG% 22.8%
Net Rtg -12.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
14
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.2

Efficient perimeter execution and steady defensive positioning drove a solid positive impact. His ability to hit timely spot-up looks kept the floor spaced without forcing bad shots into traffic. A quiet but highly effective two-way shift that kept the offense flowing.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +18.9
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Noah Penda 31.3m
13
pts
11
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.5

A massive breakout performance fueled by relentless energy and timely perimeter shooting that completely flipped his recent struggles. Even with some inefficiency inside the arc, his defensive versatility and willingness to crash the glass generated crucial extra possessions. He thrived by embracing a gritty, high-motor role that exhausted his matchups.

Shooting
FG 5/15 (33.3%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.1%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -13.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +13.0
Defense +0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Tyus Jones 17.3m
3
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.3

Operated as a stabilizing force for the second unit, prioritizing ball security and smart defensive rotations. His low usage meant he rarely forced the issue, instead letting the offense flow through better scorers while spacing the floor effectively. A quietly positive shift defined by mistake-free basketball.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Jett Howard 14.2m
4
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.1

Struggled to find a rhythm, with missed perimeter assignments and rushed jumpers dragging down his net score. He failed to bend the defense, allowing opponents to cheat off him and clog the driving lanes for primary creators. Needs to show better shot preparation to justify his floor time.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Goga Bitadze 13.5m
6
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.7

Produced an astronomical per-minute impact by completely sealing off the paint during his short stint. His verticality altered multiple shots at the rim, while quick, decisive rolls to the basket punished defensive rotations. A masterclass in maximizing limited rotation minutes through sheer physical enforcement.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +20.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +12.7
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Faded into the background during a brief, ineffective stint where he failed to leave a footprint on either end. Lacked his usual disruptive defensive timing, allowing opponents to operate comfortably in his zones. The complete absence of offensive gravity essentially made the team play four-on-five.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.8%
Net Rtg +10.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.4m
Scoring -1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0