Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
ORL lead DET lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DET 2P — 3P —
ORL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 158 attempts

DET DET Shot-making Δ

Cunningham 10/23 +0.3
Harris Hard 7/20 -3.9
Robinson Hard 5/11 +3.0
Jenkins Hard 2/7 -2.2
Thompson 2/7 -3.4
Duren Open 4/6 +0.4
Reed Hard 2/4 +0.3
LeVert Hard 0/2 -1.7

ORL ORL Shot-making Δ

Banchero Hard 4/20 -10.7
Bane Hard 7/18 +0.2
Suggs Hard 1/10 -6.3
da Silva 4/9 +0.5
Black Hard 3/7 +0.3
Carter Jr. 3/5 +0.8
Bitadze Open 3/5 0.0
Cain 1/3 -0.4
Carter Hard 1/1 +1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DET
ORL
32/80 Field Goals 27/78
40.0% Field Goal % 34.6%
9/27 3-Pointers 9/36
33.3% 3-Point % 25.0%
20/26 Free Throws 16/21
76.9% Free Throw % 76.2%
50.9% True Shooting % 45.3%
59 Total Rebounds 52
14 Offensive 8
38 Defensive 30
16 Assists 20
1.45 Assist/TO Ratio 1.82
10 Turnovers 10
5 Steals 6
8 Blocks 4
21 Fouls 22
36 Points in Paint 24
6 Fast Break Pts 6
13 Points off TOs 6
14 Second Chance Pts 14
13 Bench Points 26
14 Largest Lead 24
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Cade Cunningham
32 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 42.0 MIN
+25.14
2
Ausar Thompson
4 PTS · 10 REB · 6 AST · 36.7 MIN
+16.05
3
Desmond Bane
17 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 37.7 MIN
+12.55
4
Goga Bitadze
6 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 13.1 MIN
+9.17
5
Tobias Harris
22 PTS · 10 REB · 0 AST · 38.2 MIN
+8.36
6
Paul Reed
6 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 10.8 MIN
+8.19
7
Paolo Banchero
17 PTS · 10 REB · 6 AST · 40.8 MIN
+8.01
8
Tristan da Silva
10 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 22.5 MIN
+6.71
9
Jalen Duren
8 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 32.2 MIN
+5.8
10
Duncan Robinson
14 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 36.5 MIN
+4.95
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 DET shot clock Team TURNOVER 93–79
Q4 0:27 T. Harris REBOUND (Off:0 Def:10) 93–79
Q4 0:30 MISS P. Banchero 28' running 3PT 93–79
Q4 0:35 D. Bane REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 93–79
Q4 0:36 MISS D. Jenkins driving Layup 93–79
Q4 0:56 TEAM defensive REBOUND 93–79
Q4 0:58 MISS T. da Silva driving Layup 93–79
Q4 1:12 T. Harris 10' floating Jump Shot (22 PTS) (D. Jenkins 3 AST) 93–79
Q4 1:34 J. Suggs Free Throw 2 of 2 (7 PTS) 91–79
Q4 1:34 J. Suggs Free Throw 1 of 2 (6 PTS) 91–78
Q4 1:34 J. Duren loose ball personal FOUL (5 PF) (Suggs 2 FT) 91–77
Q4 1:34 TEAM defensive REBOUND 91–77
Q4 1:36 MISS T. Harris 27' 3PT 91–77
Q4 1:52 T. Harris REBOUND (Off:0 Def:9) 91–77
Q4 1:56 A. Thompson BLOCK (4 BLK) 91–77

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ORL Orlando Magic
S Paolo Banchero 40.8m
17
pts
10
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.9

Paolo Banchero endured a rough shooting performance, bricking all nine of his three-point attempts en route to a 4-of-20 night from the floor. He salvaged his value by relentlessly attacking the rim to draw fouls (9-of-12 FT) and operating as a high-end defensive anchor. His +5.4 Defense credit was fueled by suffocating his matchups, holding them to just 32% shooting on 22 attempts.

Shooting
FG 4/20 (20.0%)
3PT 0/9 (0.0%)
FT 9/12 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 33.6%
USG% 31.8%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.8m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +11.7
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 31.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jalen Suggs 38.2m
7
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
-11.1

Jalen Suggs suffered through a brutal offensive shift, shooting a dismal 1-of-10 from the field while leaking possessions via 5 turnovers. Despite the offensive struggles (-4.6 Offense credit), his defensive motor never stopped running. He racked up 7 deflections and 8 contests, generating a +6.2 Hustle credit that kept him engaged on the other side of the ball.

Shooting
FG 1/10 (10.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.8%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -19.7
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.2m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Desmond Bane 37.7m
17
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.3

Desmond Bane operated as a high-volume scoring engine, though his 7-of-18 shooting clip lacked his usual ruthless efficiency. His +9.6 Offense credit reflects his ability to bend the defense with his perimeter gravity, even when the shots weren't falling at an elite rate. He added value on the margins with active hands, generating 3 deflections and 2 steals.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 47.2%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg -39.1
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense +3.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.2

Wendell Carter Jr. completely abandoned the glass, failing to grab a single rebound despite his usual 6.8 average. While his rim protection was highly active (12 contests and 2 blocks), opponents consistently scored over him, shooting 56% when he was the primary defender. His efficient but low-volume scoring (9 points on 5 shots) wasn't enough to offset his defensive struggles, leading to a -1.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -4.3
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jamal Cain 20.1m
3
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.8

Jamal Cain struggled to make an offensive dent, scoring just 3 points on three shot attempts. However, he found ways to contribute through sheer grit, drawing a charge and generating a +4.6 Hustle credit. His active hands (2 deflections) and solid defensive positioning helped offset his quiet scoring night.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -12.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
8
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.7

Anthony Black played a low-usage connector role, scoring an efficient but quiet 8 points on seven shots. His +5.3 Offense credit shows he kept the ball moving without making mistakes, logging zero turnovers in 33 minutes. However, he struggled to contain his matchups defensively, allowing them to shoot 50% from the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg -21.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Tristan da Silva provided a valuable scoring punch off the bench, hitting 2-of-4 from deep to finish with 10 points. His defensive discipline was equally impressive, completely locking down his matchups and holding them to a frigid 1-of-7 shooting. This two-way efficiency fueled a solid +5.2 Offense credit and kept the second unit afloat.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +22.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +4.7
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Goga Bitadze 13.1m
6
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.1

Goga Bitadze provided highly efficient backup minutes, converting 3-of-5 shots around the rim while avoiding any turnovers. His +8.7 Offense credit highlights his ability to set solid screens and finish plays without demanding the ball. He also anchored the paint effectively, contesting 5 shots and holding opponents to 40% shooting.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -15.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.1m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

Jevon Carter made a brief 2-minute cameo, hitting his only shot attempt before heading back to the bench. He managed to track down a loose ball and contest a shot, squeezing a tiny bit of hustle value (+0.8 Hustle credit) out of his limited run. His minimal playing time prevented any larger impact.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 42.0m
32
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+29.1

Cade Cunningham put on a two-way masterclass, pairing a 32-point scoring barrage with relentless defensive activity. His 7 deflections and 4 steals (well above his 0.9 average) fueled a massive +10.6 Defense credit. Though his playmaking took a backseat, his aggression getting to the line (10-of-12 FT) and elite rebounding (10 boards) dictated the game's flow.

Shooting
FG 10/23 (43.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 10/12 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 56.6%
USG% 34.4%
Net Rtg +9.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.0m
Scoring +22.9
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +10.8
Defense +5.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 42.1%
STL 4
BLK 1
TO 4
S Tobias Harris 38.2m
22
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.3

Tobias Harris carried a heavy scoring load with 22 points, but his inefficiency (7-of-20 from the floor) capped his overall offensive value. He made up for the erratic shooting by crashing the glass for 10 rebounds and playing solid isolation defense, holding his matchups to 4-of-12 shooting. A lack of playmaking (zero assists) highlighted his singular focus on finding his own shot, resulting in a +10.3 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 6/9 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 45.9%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +22.1
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.2m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +3.0
Defense -3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Ausar Thompson 36.7m
4
pts
10
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.1

Despite a quiet scoring night (4 points), Ausar Thompson's defensive and connective presence was dominant. He completely suffocated his matchups, holding opponents to a dismal 3-of-13 shooting while racking up four blocks (well above his 1.7 average). His high-end playmaking and relentless effort (+6.7 Hustle credit) ensured he remained a massive positive on the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg +31.4
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.7m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +12.7
Defense +4.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 1
BLK 4
TO 0
S Duncan Robinson 36.5m
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast

Duncan Robinson operated strictly as a perimeter spacer, hitting 4-of-9 from deep to stretch the defense. While his shooting provided a solid +6.5 Offense credit, his complete lack of peripheral hustle stats (zero contests or deflections) limited his broader impact. He did manage to keep his immediate matchups quiet, holding them scoreless on four attempts.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +36.9
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jalen Duren 32.2m
8
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.6

Jalen Duren saw a significant drop in scoring volume (8 points) compared to his usual output, taking only six shots. However, his +10.1 Offense credit reflects his hyper-efficient finishing and physical screen-setting (5 screen assists) that opened up lanes for teammates. He also provided sturdy rim protection, contesting 10 shots and limiting opponents to 38% shooting when guarded.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.1%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +10.5
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.7

Daniss Jenkins struggled to find his rhythm offensively, shooting just 2-of-7 from the field during his 19 minutes. Despite the scoring dip, he remained engaged defensively, holding his matchups to 29% shooting and generating a couple of deflections. His +2.8 Offense credit indicates he kept the ball moving, even if his own shot wasn't falling.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +0.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Javonte Green failed to attempt a single shot during his 11 minutes on the floor, completely disappearing from the offensive game plan. He tried to salvage his shift through sheer energy, tracking down a loose ball and posting a +1.6 Hustle credit. However, his lack of scoring gravity made him a spacing liability.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Paul Reed 10.8m
6
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.9

Paul Reed operated as a highly disruptive interior presence during his 11 minutes, racking up 3 blocks and contesting 6 shots. His rim protection was exceptional, suffocating his matchups into a dismal 1-of-8 shooting performance to earn a +3.1 Defense credit. He paired this defensive dominance with efficient finishing around the basket (2-of-4 FG).

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +39.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Isaiah Stewart was a complete offensive ghost in his 8 minutes of action, failing to register a single shot attempt or rebound. His brief stint was mostly an exercise in cardio, though he did manage to contest three shots defensively. Ultimately, his inability to make a tangible mark on the game resulted in a muted +0.3 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -57.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.2m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.3

Caris LeVert's brief 4-minute cameo was entirely unproductive, missing both of his shot attempts and failing to record a rebound or assist. His negative offensive credit (-1.7) reflects a stint where he forced empty possessions without creating for others. He was quickly pulled from the rotation after failing to provide any bench spark.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -51.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.5m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0