ORL

2025-26 Season

JONATHAN ISAAC

Orlando Magic | Forward | 6-10
Jonathan Isaac
2.6 PPG
2.5 RPG
0.4 APG
10.0 MPG
+0.3 Impact

Isaac produces at an average rate for a 10-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.3
Scoring +1.2
Points 2.6 PPG × +1.00 = +2.6
Missed 2PT 0.6/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 0.6/g × -0.87 = -0.5
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +1.0
Assists 0.4/g × +0.50 = +0.2
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -0.6
Turnovers 0.3/g × -1.95 = -0.6
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 1.9/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.6
Contested Shots 2.6/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.2/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +3.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −3.0
Net Impact
+0.3
54th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 4th
3.2 PPG
Efficiency 4th
43.2% TS
Playmaking 3th
0.5 APG
Rebounding 27th
3.1 RPG
Rim Protection 94th
0.24/min
Hustle 91th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 89th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Extreme volatility as a defensive specialist defined Jonathan Isaac's opening stretch, where his elite rim protection constantly warred against his complete lack of offensive gravity. During the 11/10 vs POR matchup, he scored just seven points but generated a massive +10.1 impact score. He achieved this by wreaking absolute havoc as a defensive free safety, using his immense wingspan to blow up multiple actions and rescue possessions without needing the ball in his hands. Conversely, his eight-point outing on 11/01 vs WAS actually dragged the team down to a -3.1 impact mark. Despite a decent scoring night for his standards, a surprisingly muted defensive effort and failure to generate his usual disruption left the second unit highly vulnerable. He finally struck the perfect balance on 11/20 vs LAC, pairing flawless 4-for-4 shooting with active rim protection to post a staggering +10.6 impact in just sixteen minutes. When he engages physically, Isaac remains a terrifying weak-side roamer, but his frequent offensive disappearing acts keep his overall value tethered to the break-even point.

Jonathan Isaac’s midseason stretch was defined by a bizarre tightrope act where his terrifying defensive intimidation constantly battled his total offensive invisibility. When he fully engaged on the less glamorous end of the floor, his disruption drove massive value without him needing to hunt shots. During a highly condensed ten-minute stint on 12/27 vs DEN, he scored just five points but posted a staggering +17.9 impact score by utterly terrorizing the opposition with a defensive masterclass. Yet, his complete lack of scoring gravity often crippled the second unit. On 01/30 vs TOR, defenders freely sagged off him to double-team primary ball-handlers, resulting in a brutal -9.0 impact score even though he chipped in four points and four rebounds. He found a fleeting two-way balance on 01/06 vs WAS, leveraging elite rim protection and hyper-efficient finishing to post a +12.4 impact score in just 12 minutes. Ultimately, when Isaac actively protected the paint, he was a game-wrecking force, but when he settled into the background, he functioned as a zero-gravity liability who actively hindered his own teammates.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Isaac's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~3 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Isaac locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -0.1, second-half +0.8. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

G. Yabusele 23.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
O. Anunoby 22.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 18.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Adebayo 18.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
K. Towns 18.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 5
C. Capela 17.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Wembanyama 14.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.63
PTS 9
R. Kalkbrenner 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Valančiūnas 13.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 4
J. Williams 13.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Adebayo 25.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 8
A. Wiggins 23.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
K. Towns 20.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 5
O. Anunoby 20.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
G. Yabusele 20.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Sengun 19.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
R. Kalkbrenner 17.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
R. Holland II 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Brown 15.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
J. Valančiūnas 14.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

52
Games
2.6
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.4
APG
0.4
SPG
0.6
BPG
42.2
FG%
18.4
3P%
60.3
FT%
10.0
MPG

GAME LOG

52 games played