Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DET lead ORL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
ORL 2P — 3P —
DET 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 155 attempts

ORL ORL Shot-making Δ

Banchero Hard 14/25 +8.1
Black 4/12 -4.7
Bane Hard 5/10 +3.5
Suggs Hard 2/9 -4.2
Carter Jr. Hard 3/7 +0.3
Cain Hard 2/6 -0.8
Wagner 1/3 -0.6
Carter Hard 0/2 -1.7
da Silva Hard 0/1 -0.9

DET DET Shot-making Δ

Harris Hard 11/18 +9.7
Cunningham Hard 10/18 +7.5
Robinson Hard 4/13 -3.0
Duren 5/9 +0.5
Jenkins Hard 5/8 +6.8
Thompson Open 4/5 +1.7
Green Hard 1/5 -2.0
Stewart 0/2 -2.0
Lanier Hard 1/1 +1.2
Reed Open 0/1 -1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
ORL
DET
31/75 Field Goals 41/80
41.3% Field Goal % 51.2%
10/30 3-Pointers 16/33
33.3% 3-Point % 48.5%
22/30 Free Throws 18/22
73.3% Free Throw % 81.8%
53.3% True Shooting % 64.7%
46 Total Rebounds 51
9 Offensive 11
24 Defensive 30
18 Assists 30
1.12 Assist/TO Ratio 2.14
13 Turnovers 13
11 Steals 9
7 Blocks 6
21 Fouls 21
28 Points in Paint 38
9 Fast Break Pts 16
15 Points off TOs 19
15 Second Chance Pts 19
16 Bench Points 21
4 Largest Lead 25
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Tobias Harris
30 PTS · 9 REB · 2 AST · 36.3 MIN
+34.31
2
Paolo Banchero
38 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 41.9 MIN
+22.88
3
Cade Cunningham
32 PTS · 1 REB · 12 AST · 39.5 MIN
+20.85
4
Jalen Duren
15 PTS · 15 REB · 3 AST · 37.1 MIN
+18.8
5
Ausar Thompson
8 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 33.8 MIN
+15.04
6
Desmond Bane
16 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 38.2 MIN
+14.8
7
Anthony Black
11 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 32.6 MIN
+13.63
8
Daniss Jenkins
16 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 28.9 MIN
+10.51
9
Duncan Robinson
10 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 36.0 MIN
+9.19
10
Wendell Carter Jr.
13 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 38.3 MIN
+8.72
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:16 ORL shot clock Team TURNOVER 94–116
Q4 0:40 C. Lanier 12' driving floating Jump Shot (2 PTS) (M. Sasser 1 AST) 94–116
Q4 1:03 P. Banchero Free Throw 2 of 2 (38 PTS) 94–114
Q4 1:03 P. Banchero Free Throw 1 of 2 (37 PTS) 93–114
Q4 1:03 J. Green shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Banchero 2 FT) 92–114
Q4 1:13 D. Jenkins Free Throw 2 of 2 (16 PTS) 92–114
Q4 1:13 D. Jenkins Free Throw 1 of 2 (15 PTS) 92–113
Q4 1:13 A. Black shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Jenkins 2 FT) 92–112
Q4 1:23 T. Harris REBOUND (Off:2 Def:7) 92–112
Q4 1:27 MISS A. Black 26' pullup 3PT 92–112
Q4 1:33 J. Duren Free Throw 2 of 2 (15 PTS) 92–112
Q4 1:33 J. Duren Free Throw 1 of 2 (14 PTS) 92–111
Q4 1:33 W. Carter Jr. personal FOUL (3 PF) (Duren 2 FT) 92–110
Q4 1:49 W. Carter Jr. Free Throw 2 of 2 (13 PTS) 92–110
Q4 1:49 TEAM offensive REBOUND 91–110

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 39.5m
32
pts
1
reb
12
ast
Impact
+15.7

Cunningham orchestrated a brilliant offensive masterclass, pouring in 32 points on 56% shooting while dishing out 12 assists. His lethal perimeter touch (4-of-6 from deep) and steady parade to the foul line (8-of-10 FT) drove a massive +23.9 Offensive credit. He also put in significant effort on the margins, logging 10 shot contests and 4 deflections to round out a dominant two-way showing.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +38.2
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring +25.8
Creation +4.3
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.5
Turnovers -9.5
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 4
S Jalen Duren 37.1m
15
pts
15
reb
3
ast
Impact
+17.9

Duren was an absolute force on the interior, pairing 15 points with a dominant 15 rebounds to control the paint. His efficiency around the rim (5-of-9 FG) and solid free-throw shooting (5-of-6) fueled a massive +18.3 Offensive credit. He also put in the dirty work, tallying 8 shot contests and 3 screen assists to anchor the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 16.5%
Net Rtg +40.9
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.1m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +19.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Tobias Harris 36.3m
30
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+34.8

Harris erupted for a highly efficient 30 points (11-of-18 FG), torching the nets from deep (5-of-7) to drive a massive +26.6 Offensive credit. He was just as impactful on the other end, pulling down 9 rebounds and snatching 3 steals to anchor a stellar +9.4 Defensive credit. His two-way dominance and 8 shot contests defined a spectacular veteran performance.

Shooting
FG 11/18 (61.1%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.6%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg +31.4
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.3m
Scoring +25.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +7.5
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S Duncan Robinson 36.0m
10
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.4

Robinson’s jumper completely abandoned him, as he clanked his way to a 2-of-10 showing from beyond the arc. Surprisingly, he offset his shooting woes with a wildly disruptive defensive shift, racking up 3 steals and 5 deflections to earn a +7.2 Defensive credit. He also chipped in on the glass with 6 rebounds (well above his 2.9 average), finding ways to contribute despite the cold shooting.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.5%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +22.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +4.7
Defense +6.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ausar Thompson 33.8m
8
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.5

Thompson was a highly efficient connective piece, burying 4-of-5 shots from the floor to fuel a strong +9.0 Offensive credit. His defensive versatility shone brightly, as he racked up 2 steals, 2 blocks, and 3 deflections to anchor a robust +6.6 Defensive credit. He perfectly executed his low-usage role, keeping the ball moving with 4 assists while wreaking havoc on the other end.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.5%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +18.8
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
16
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.9

Jenkins provided a lethal scoring punch off the bench, burying 4 of his 5 three-point attempts to finish with 16 highly efficient points. His playmaking was solid (5 assists), though it was slightly offset by 3 turnovers, resulting in a strong +10.7 Offensive credit. He capitalized on his 29 minutes of action, serving as a vital spacing valve for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.1%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -5.9
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.2

Green struggled mightily to find his range, missing 4 of his 5 three-point attempts to finish with just 3 points. His peripheral contributions were equally quiet, managing only 2 rebounds and failing to record a single steal or assist. The frigid shooting and lack of defensive disruption led to a negative impact across the board.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +21.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring -0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.0

Stewart was completely ineffective during his brief 7-minute shift, failing to score while missing both of his field goal attempts. He offered no rim protection (zero blocks) and managed just a single rebound. A lone turnover further dragged down his -3.2 Offensive credit in a thoroughly empty outing.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Paul Reed 2.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.2

Reed barely registered in his two minutes of floor time, missing his only shot attempt to finish scoreless. He failed to grab a rebound or record any defensive stats, rendering his brief cameo entirely inconsequential.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -125.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.0

Sasser made only a fleeting appearance, logging just over a minute of action. He managed to dish out a single assist (+0.5 Offense credit) but otherwise left the box score blank.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Holland II saw just one minute of garbage time, failing to record a single statistic. His zero-impact line perfectly reflects a shift with no actual involvement.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tolu Smith 1.2m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Smith was a non-factor in his 73 seconds of play, putting up a completely empty box score. He did not attempt a shot or grab a rebound during his brief stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

Lanier made the most of his single minute of action, converting his only field goal attempt to score 2 points. It was a microscopic but perfectly efficient cameo that yielded a +2.0 Offensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ORL Orlando Magic
S Paolo Banchero 41.9m
38
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+21.5

Banchero was an absolute offensive juggernaut, pouring in 38 points on highly efficient 56% shooting to drive a massive +24.9 Offensive credit. He scorched the nets from deep (4-of-7) while maintaining his usual playmaking load with 6 assists. However, his aggressive usage came with a cost, as he coughed up 5 turnovers (above his 3.6 average) in a heavy 42-minute workload.

Shooting
FG 14/25 (56.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 34.4%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.9m
Scoring +30.0
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +8.9
Hustle +5.6
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -11.8
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 5
13
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.1

Carter Jr. salvaged a quiet shooting night (3-of-7) by aggressively attacking the rim to draw fouls, sinking 6-of-8 at the stripe to boost his +11.8 Offensive credit. His work on the glass was slightly subdued (5 rebounds vs 6.7 average), and he failed to record a steal. Still, his 3 screen assists highlighted his willingness to do the dirty work to free up Orlando's perimeter threats.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -39.8
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +4.4
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Desmond Bane 38.2m
16
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.8

Bane paired his usual perimeter marksmanship (3-of-5 from deep) with flawless decision-making, logging zero turnovers across 38 minutes. His +4.1 Defensive credit reflects a highly disruptive shift, highlighted by 2 steals and 3 deflections. While his scoring volume dipped slightly below his season average, his two-way efficiency kept the offense humming.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -14.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.2m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jalen Suggs 35.9m
6
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.7

Suggs endured a miserable shooting night, missing all four of his three-point attempts to finish with just 6 points (22% FG). However, he completely flipped the script on the other end, generating a massive +9.2 Defensive credit through sheer disruption. Racking up 4 steals, 2 blocks, and 5 deflections, his relentless point-of-attack pressure salvaged a game where his jumper completely abandoned him.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.4%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -39.6
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.9m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense +8.0
Turnovers -7.1
STL 4
BLK 2
TO 3
S Jamal Cain 23.6m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.5

Cain struggled to find his rhythm offensively, converting just 2-of-6 from the floor to finish below his scoring average with 5 points. Despite the quiet scoring night (+3.9 Offense credit), he made his presence felt inside by swatting 2 shots (well above his 0.3 average). His rim protection and rebounding (4 boards) provided a modest defensive lift off the bench.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.8%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -36.4
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
11
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.3

An absolute defensive masterclass defined Black's performance, as he racked up 5 steals and 4 deflections to drive a stellar +10.4 Defensive credit. He struggled to find his touch from outside, missing all four of his three-point attempts during a clunky 4-of-12 shooting night. Despite the offensive inefficiency, his relentless ball pressure and solid rebounding (5 boards) made him a vital disruptive force.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -21.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +3.4
Defense +8.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 1
Jevon Carter 11.3m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.2

Carter was completely invisible during his 11-minute cameo, failing to score while missing both of his field goal attempts. He offered almost no peripheral value, managing just a single rebound and assist. His quiet +0.7 Offensive credit perfectly encapsulates a shift devoid of any meaningful impact.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +19.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.3m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Wagner provided a brief but efficient scoring punch off the bench, knocking down his only three-point attempt to finish with 5 points in just under 10 minutes. He was active in the dirty work, drawing a charge and contesting 2 shots to earn a +3.1 Hustle credit. Though his overall footprint was small, his energy helped stabilize the second unit.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.7m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.6

Da Silva was a complete non-factor in his 8 minutes of action, putting up a barren box score with zero points, rebounds, or assists. His brief stint was actively harmful to the offense (-4.8 Offense credit), as he committed 2 turnovers without generating a single positive play. It was a purely empty-calorie shift that forced him quickly back to the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -75.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.4m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2