Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAC lead MEM lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MEM 2P — 3P —
LAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 166 attempts

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Jackson Jr. Hard 13/18 +12.8
Spencer Hard 9/13 +11.7
Morant 4/12 -2.7
Wells Hard 5/10 +1.9
Coward 5/9 +0.9
Williams Jr. Hard 3/7 +0.8
Landale Open 3/5 0.0
Caldwell-Pope Hard 2/5 -0.6
Aldama Hard 1/5 -2.8
Mashack Hard 0/1 -0.9

LAC LAC Shot-making Δ

Leonard Hard 9/18 +3.3
Harden Hard 4/10 +4.4
Dunn Hard 6/10 +4.3
Collins 5/10 -1.4
Brown Hard 2/10 -5.7
Bogdanović Hard 2/6 +0.5
Miller 3/6 +0.4
Zubac Open 3/6 -0.8
Sanders Hard 2/3 +2.2
Christie Hard 1/1 +1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MEM
LAC
45/86 Field Goals 37/80
52.3% Field Goal % 46.2%
16/39 3-Pointers 13/36
41.0% 3-Point % 36.1%
15/17 Free Throws 16/22
88.2% Free Throw % 72.7%
64.7% True Shooting % 57.4%
43 Total Rebounds 50
9 Offensive 13
23 Defensive 26
33 Assists 26
3.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.37
11 Turnovers 18
10 Steals 4
7 Blocks 2
21 Fouls 15
52 Points in Paint 38
14 Fast Break Pts 13
15 Points off TOs 21
14 Second Chance Pts 15
47 Bench Points 36
23 Largest Lead 9
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jaren Jackson Jr.
31 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 32.8 MIN
+32.14
2
Cam Spencer
27 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 30.0 MIN
+25.81
3
Kawhi Leonard
21 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 36.6 MIN
+14.15
4
Jaylen Wells
16 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 29.7 MIN
+13.57
5
Jock Landale
8 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 27.5 MIN
+13.42
6
Kris Dunn
17 PTS · 1 REB · 5 AST · 26.7 MIN
+12.94
7
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
4 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 23.4 MIN
+11.47
8
James Harden
13 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 31.3 MIN
+10.49
9
Ja Morant
12 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 21.0 MIN
+10.0
10
Jordan Miller
10 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 21.9 MIN
+8.97
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 C. Spencer REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 121–103
Q4 0:05 MISS O. Prosper 26' step back 3PT 121–103
Q4 0:18 O. Prosper REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 121–103
Q4 0:20 MISS C. Spencer 28' pullup 3PT 121–103
Q4 0:40 C. Christie Free Throw 2 of 2 (3 PTS) 121–103
Q4 0:40 TEAM offensive REBOUND 121–102
Q4 0:40 MISS C. Christie Free Throw 1 of 2 121–102
Q4 0:40 O. Prosper shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Christie 2 FT) 121–102
Q4 0:56 J. Mashack traveling TURNOVER (1 TO) 121–102
Q4 1:08 Y. Niederhäuser bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (1 TO) 121–102
Q4 1:08 Y. Niederhäuser REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 121–102
Q4 1:09 MISS J. Mashack 7' driving floating Shot 121–102
Q4 1:28 Y. Niederhäuser Free Throw 2 of 2 (2 PTS) 121–102
Q4 1:28 Y. Niederhäuser Free Throw 1 of 2 (1 PTS) 121–101
Q4 1:28 J. Wells personal FOUL (2 PF) (Niederhäuser 2 FT) 121–100

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 36.6m
21
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.7

Heavy isolation volume and poor perimeter efficiency neutralized what looked like a solid scoring night. Despite strong defensive metrics (+5.4 Def), the hidden costs of missed jumpers and stalled offensive flow kept him perfectly flat.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -17.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +5.1
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Ivica Zubac 33.1m
6
pts
13
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

A sharp drop in offensive aggression (-59% scoring vs average) severely limited his overall utility. While he anchored the defensive glass (+5.5 Def), his inability to punish mismatches in the post tanked his net impact.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -21.9
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +15.5
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S James Harden 31.3m
13
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+6.5

Excellent defensive metrics (+6.3 Def) were completely undone by poor two-point efficiency and likely live-ball turnovers. Even with a hot hand from deep, the empty possessions generated by his drive-and-kick game dragged him into the red.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.3%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg -6.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kris Dunn 26.7m
17
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
+6.2

A shocking offensive surge (+372% scoring vs average) masked some uncharacteristic perimeter defensive struggles (-0.6 Def). He capitalized on open catch-and-shoot opportunities to keep his rating above water despite getting beat off the dribble.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +1.4
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S John Collins 26.1m
10
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.0

Failing to stretch the floor or protect the rim (+2.8 Def) resulted in a deeply negative outing. His interior touches were fine, but a lack of high-leverage defensive plays allowed opponents to score too easily on his watch.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -5.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Kobe Brown 25.4m
9
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

A brutal perimeter shooting night snapped a four-game hot streak and completely tanked his offensive value. Outstanding hustle metrics (+5.2) couldn't salvage a rating dragged down by so many wasted possessions from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 2/10 (20.0%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.3%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -55.3
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.7

Efficient secondary scoring was perfectly offset by a lack of high-leverage defensive plays (+1.2 Def). He existed purely as a system player in this one, neither elevating the lineup nor actively hurting it.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -35.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.2

Poor defensive positioning (-0.5 Def) and inefficient overall shooting outweighed a slight uptick in his scoring volume. He surrendered too many easy looks on the perimeter, negating any value he provided as a floor spacer.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg -65.7
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.9m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Kobe Sanders 12.6m
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Passive offensive involvement and a lack of defensive playmaking (+0.9 Def) resulted in a steep negative score. He failed to assert himself during his shift, allowing the opposition to control the tempo while he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -24.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.4

Making the most of a tiny window, he boosted his rating with perfect shooting and quick ball movement. He executed the offense flawlessly during his brief stint to post a highly efficient per-minute score.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.8%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +83.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.0

Barely moved the needle in a short stint, offering slight defensive resistance (+1.2 Def) but zero offensive gravity. He essentially ran cardio without impacting the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +83.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
31
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+28.2

Elite two-way dominance defined this performance, highlighted by near-perfect perimeter execution and suffocating rim protection (+11.7 Def). His exceptional shot selection maximized offensive efficiency while his hustle plays (+4.1) completely neutralized the opposing frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 13/18 (72.2%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.1%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg +8.8
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +27.0
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +8.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.8
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 2
BLK 5
TO 2
S Santi Aldama 30.8m
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.7

A complete inability to connect from beyond the arc cratered his offensive value. Even with solid defensive positioning (+4.4 Def) and active hustle (+3.5), the sheer volume of empty possessions and poor shot selection dragged his net score into the basement.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 10.1%
Net Rtg +7.9
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 43.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jaylen Wells 29.7m
16
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.0

A massive scoring spike (+113% vs average) fueled a strong positive rating, driven by aggressive drives to the rim. Despite poor perimeter efficiency, his active defensive rotations (+4.6 Def) kept his overall impact comfortably in the green.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Cedric Coward 23.2m
12
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.1

Defensive lapses (-0.9 Def) and likely off-ball fouls erased the goodwill from his efficient interior finishing. While he crashed the glass hard (+4.5 Hustle), his inability to stay in front of his matchup proved too costly overall.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg -36.7
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Ja Morant 21.0m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.8

Inefficient shot selection inside the arc severely limited his offensive ceiling. He barely broke even on the night, relying on steady defensive reads (+3.0 Def) to offset the damage from his missed floaters and contested layups.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg -18.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Cam Spencer 30.0m
27
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+23.9

An absolute perimeter explosion (+246% scoring vs average) shattered his usual output and carried the offense. His lethal catch-and-shoot execution punished drop coverage all night, resulting in a massive +26.2 box score metric.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 7/10 (70.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 97.3%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +48.8
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +24.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +7.6
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jock Landale 27.5m
8
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.5

Anchoring the paint with excellent verticality (+5.9 Def) drove a highly effective shift. He didn't force his offense, capitalizing on high-percentage looks around the basket to maintain a steady positive impact.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +50.9
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
4
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+0.1

Low-usage offensive nights rarely yield positive scores, but relentless defensive ball pressure (+5.7 Def) flipped the script. He generated value entirely through disruptive hustle plays (+4.0) and smart passing rather than scoring volume.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +65.9
+/- +30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.9

Serviceable minutes were anchored by timely perimeter shooting, though his defensive impact (+1.9 Def) remained relatively muted. He managed the game well without committing glaring mistakes, resulting in a perfectly adequate rating.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +62.9
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.3m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.4

A brief, empty cameo snapped his three-game streak of highly efficient shooting. Failing to record any positive hustle metrics in limited action left him with a slight negative grade.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.1

Garbage time minutes yielded zero production and a quick negative box score rating. He failed to register any defensive or hustle stats, acting as a complete non-factor during his short stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 40.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.7m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1