MEM

2025-26 Season

JAVON SMALL

Memphis Grizzlies | Guard | 6-1
Javon Small
9.4 PPG
3.1 RPG
3.8 APG
20.1 MPG
-0.1 Impact

Small produces at an average rate for a 20-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.1
Scoring +6.1
Points 9.4 PPG × +1.00 = +9.4
Missed 2PT 1.7/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 1.9/g × -0.87 = -1.7
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.9
Assists 3.8/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -2.7
Turnovers 1.4/g × -1.95 = -2.7
Defense +0.8
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.3/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.6/g × +0.65 = +1.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.3
Raw Impact +9.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.2
Net Impact
-0.1
68th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 55th
10.2 PPG
Efficiency 88th
60.5% TS
Playmaking 77th
4.1 APG
Rebounding 61th
3.4 RPG
Rim Protection 69th
0.14/min
Hustle 47th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 30th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Javon Small’s first twenty games of the 2025-26 season were defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between offensive black hole and sudden scoring spark. His worst habits surfaced during a dreadful 10/24 vs MIA appearance. Despite logging eight assists, settling for heavily contested perimeter jumpers completely derailed the offense and yielded an abysmal -14.0 impact score. Stats rarely told the whole story with Small. During an efficient 14-point outing on 01/07 vs PHX, he still posted a -0.7 impact because severe defensive lapses at the point of attack surrendered everything he generated on the other end. Then came the sudden flashes. He erupted for 22 points on 02/07 vs POR, slicing through the defense in transition to generate a massive +12.4 impact score. Until he stops dying on screens and eliminates his ill-advised shot selection, Small will remain a highly volatile gamble off the bench.

This stretch of the season was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between Javon Small's lethal perimeter shot-making and his occasionally reckless decision-making. When dialed in, he was an absolute force. He eviscerated the defense on Mar 13 vs DET for 23 points, posting a massive +18.5 impact score by pairing his offensive punch with suffocating defensive activity. He did not even need to score to tilt the floor, managing just 2 points on Mar 07 vs LAC but still generating a +3.8 impact through sheer hustle and elite effort on the margins. Yet, his aggression sometimes morphed into recklessness. During a Mar 10 vs PHI matchup, forced entry passes and sloppy ball security completely derailed his rhythm, resulting in a brutal -7.7 impact despite handing out 7 assists. Similarly, he dropped 17 points on Mar 21 vs CHA but suffered a -3.6 impact because hidden defensive lapses quietly sabotaged the team's momentum.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Small's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Small consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -2.5, second-half: +2.3. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 40 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Harper 27.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Henderson 27.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
C. Love 27.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 7
R. Dennis 26.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 7
B. Williams 24.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Walter 24.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 7
J. McLaughlin 22.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
B. Podziemski 19.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4
B. Wesley 19.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 5
R. Sheppard 18.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Podziemski 32.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
R. Dennis 29.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
S. Henderson 28.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
J. Walter 25.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Wesley 24.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
C. Love 24.0 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.5
PTS 12
R. Sheppard 23.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McLaughlin 21.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 5
M. Christie 21.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Williams 20.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

40
Games
9.4
PPG
3.1
RPG
3.8
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
47.2
FG%
43.9
3P%
82.5
FT%
20.1
MPG

GAME LOG

40 games played