CLE

2025-26 Season

KEON ELLIS

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard | 6-4
Keon Ellis
6.5 PPG
1.8 RPG
0.9 APG
20.3 MPG
-0.2 Impact

Ellis produces at an average rate for a 20-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.2
Scoring +3.7
Points 6.5 PPG × +1.00 = +6.5
Missed 2PT 0.8/g × -0.78 = -0.6
Missed 3PT 2.2/g × -0.87 = -1.9
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +1.1
Assists 0.9/g × +0.50 = +0.5
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +1.9
Steals 1.2/g × +2.30 = +2.8
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 1.4/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.5
Contested Shots 2.8/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 2.8/g × +0.65 = +1.8
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.3/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.8
Raw Impact +9.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.2
Net Impact
-0.2
67th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 28th
6.7 PPG
Efficiency 37th
52.9% TS
Playmaking 10th
1.0 APG
Rebounding 14th
1.8 RPG
Rim Protection 90th
0.18/min
Hustle 96th
0.17/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 90th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Keon Ellis spent the first twenty games of the season riding a chaotic pendulum between defensive menace and offensive ghost. When he embraced his role as a relentless point-of-attack pest, his value spiked regardless of his scoring totals. Take 11/26 vs PHX, where he managed just 6 points but posted a massive +7.1 impact score simply by blowing up dribble hand-offs and hounding opposing ball-handlers. Conversely, his hotter shooting nights were sometimes erased by glaring lapses on the other end of the floor. During 11/03 vs DEN, he poured in 15 points on scorching 5-of-8 shooting from deep, yet finished with a -0.4 impact because costly defensive breakdowns bled away all his value. Far too often, hesitation and poor discipline dragged him down entirely. On 11/07 vs OKC, a brutal combination of biting on pump fakes and launching ill-advised shots resulted in an abysmal -7.6 impact score. To survive in this league, Ellis must realize his true calling card is suffocating perimeter defense, not erratic scoring bursts.

This stretch was defined by maddening offensive passivity interrupted by fleeting flashes of perimeter brilliance. When he aggressively hunted his shot, he looked like a legitimate rotation piece, like his surprise start on 12/27 vs DAL where a 21-point barrage shifted the floor's geometry for a +4.7 impact score. He could even swing a game without scoring, as seen on 01/06 vs DAL where a meager five points was offset by relentless point-of-attack pressure and a +5.2 hustle score to generate a +4.6 impact. Yet, his value often cratered even when his shot was falling. Look at 01/25 vs DET; despite pouring in 14 points, his -5.5 impact score revealed the ugly truth of him being ruthlessly hunted by bigger guards on the defensive end. Too often, Ellis completely vanished from the game plan by passing up open looks and crippling his team's spacing. If he refuses to shoot, his defensive hustle simply cannot keep him on the court.

Extreme volatility defined this pivotal stretch for Keon Ellis, who oscillated wildly between acting as a suffocating defensive menace and an absolute offensive zero. When his jumper abandoned him, he often found ways to tilt the floor entirely through sheer effort. Look at his 02/07 vs SAC performance. Despite scoring a meager 6 points, he posted a massive +10.2 impact score because his relentless point-of-attack defense completely blew up opposing pick-and-roll actions. When his outside shot actually connected, as it did on 03/11 vs ORL, he looked like a premier two-way weapon. He poured in 20 points that night, yielding an +8.6 impact score fueled by efficient scoring and timely screen navigation. Yet, his offensive disappearing acts carried a steep cost. During a brutal start on 03/15 vs DAL, he repeatedly bricked open shots, completely killing the team's rhythm and dragging his overall impact down to a dismal -13.1.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Ellis's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 42% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Ellis consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -1.0, second-half: +0.6. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Nembhard 51.1 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 13
N. Powell 41.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Christie 40.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
B. Williams 37.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Hardaway Jr. 34.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
J. Giddey 33.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 7
C. Gillespie 31.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
L. Dončić 30.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
K. Thompson 29.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
C. Flagg 28.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.31
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Nembhard 51.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
N. Powell 44.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
M. Christie 37.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
T. Hardaway Jr. 36.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
L. Dončić 33.0 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.39
PTS 13
C. Gillespie 32.3 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
N. Marshall 31.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 13
A. Reaves 31.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 8
R. Sheppard 29.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 12
B. Williams 29.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

68
Games
6.5
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.9
APG
1.2
SPG
0.7
BPG
43.5
FG%
36.1
3P%
72.3
FT%
20.3
MPG

GAME LOG

68 games played