CLE

2025-26 Season

CRAIG PORTER JR.

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard | 6-1
Craig Porter Jr.
4.3 PPG
3.3 RPG
3.2 APG
17.6 MPG
-0.6 Impact

Jr. produces at an average rate for a 18-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.6
Scoring +2.2
Points 4.3 PPG × +1.00 = +4.3
Missed 2PT 1.3/g × -0.78 = -1.0
Missed 3PT 0.9/g × -0.87 = -0.8
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +2.6
Assists 3.2/g × +0.50 = +1.6
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +1.4
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.6/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 2.5/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 2.6/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 2.2/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +6.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −7.2
Net Impact
-0.6
61st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 10th
4.7 PPG
Efficiency 18th
48.0% TS
Playmaking 65th
3.5 APG
Rebounding 65th
3.5 RPG
Rim Protection 95th
0.20/min
Hustle 79th
0.13/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 58th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Craig Porter Jr.’s early season was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between suffocating defensive disruption and chaotic offensive stagnation. When he embraced the role of a gritty, low-mistake game manager, his value skyrocketed regardless of his shooting volume. On 10/27 vs DET, he managed a meager 4 points on 1-for-4 shooting, yet generated a stellar +7.0 impact score entirely through relentless point-of-attack ball pressure. Conversely, forcing the issue routinely punished his team. During his 01/19 vs OKC appearance, a 9-point scoring surge was completely negated by the hidden costs of empty possessions and poor defensive rotations, dragging him to a dismal -6.3 impact. He is at his absolute best when marrying flawless shot selection with his natural defensive instincts. Look no further than 11/12 vs MIA, where he orchestrated a two-way masterclass with 19 points and 9 assists to post a staggering +16.3 impact score.

Craig Porter Jr.'s midseason stretch was defined by a maddening offensive passivity that gradually eroded his on-court value. Early on, he occasionally found ways to influence winning without shooting, such as his +4.2 impact score on 12/17 vs CHI, where suffocating defensive pressure and flawless execution on limited touches drove his positive rating. However, that momentum vanished entirely once opponents realized they could completely ignore him as a scoring threat. During an ugly 01/10 vs MIN performance, Porter dished out eight assists but suffered a brutal -9.7 impact mark because his total lack of scoring gravity allowed defenders to aggressively jump passing lanes. Even when he did manage to find the basket, hidden costs ultimately dragged him down. On 01/21 vs CHA, he tallied seven points—a massive scoring spike relative to his recent averages—but still posted a -4.7 impact due to costly defensive lapses and a lack of overall floor connection. You simply cannot survive as a rotational NBA guard if you refuse to look at the rim.

Craig Porter Jr. spent this stretch oscillating wildly between brilliant connective playmaking and debilitating offensive passivity. He operated as a pure floor general on 02/01 vs POR, generating a +2.7 impact despite scoring just 3 points because his 12 assists and pinpoint kick-outs completely dissected the defense. That pass-first mentality often backfired. Even though he racked up another 12 assists on 02/27 vs DET, his dismal 2-for-9 shooting and reluctance to attack the rim allowed defenders to aggressively cheat off him, dragging his impact score down to a -3.7. This lack of scoring gravity bottomed out entirely on 02/09 vs DEN. During that brief nine-minute stint, a completely invisible zero-point, zero-assist outing resulted in a disastrous -13.3 impact. He has the vision of a true point guard, but his frequent refusal to look at the basket routinely forces his teammates to play four-on-five.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Jr.'s impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~4 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jr. consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +1.5, second-half: -2.6. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Jenkins 48.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. McConnell 40.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
T. Maxey 35.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
I. Quickley 28.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
A. Thompson 26.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
B. Hyland 26.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
R. Holland II 25.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
Q. Grimes 24.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Fox 23.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Edwards 23.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Jenkins 42.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
R. Sheppard 35.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7
C. Love 29.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
Q. Grimes 28.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 7
T. McConnell 28.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 27.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
B. Hyland 24.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
I. Quickley 24.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
T. Maxey 23.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
R. Rollins 23.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

60
Games
4.3
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.2
APG
0.9
SPG
0.6
BPG
43.9
FG%
34.5
3P%
55.6
FT%
17.6
MPG

GAME LOG

60 games played