GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAC Sacramento Kings
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.7

Offensive stagnation and missed bunnies in the paint severely depressed his overall impact score. While he held his own defensively against physical post-ups (+5.0 Def), his inability to command double-teams bogged down the half-court spacing. The offense simply did not flow through him with its usual rhythm.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg -61.1
+/- -38
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +1.1
Defense +5.0
Raw total +8.1
Avg player in 26.4m -14.8
Impact -6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
9
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-2.5

Despite solid perimeter defense and fighting over screens (+4.0 Def), his overall impact slipped into the negative due to poor finishing inside the arc. He successfully spaced the floor from deep but struggled to convert drives in traffic. The inability to collapse the defense off the dribble limited his playmaking effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -35.4
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Offense +5.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.0
Raw total +11.8
Avg player in 25.9m -14.3
Impact -2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-12.3

Errant perimeter shooting and reckless drives into traffic cratered his overall impact to a team-worst rating. Defensive lapses off the ball (-0.9 Def) compounded the damage from his inefficient offensive volume. The constant disruption of the team's offensive flow through forced actions defined this highly negative stint.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.1%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg -61.8
+/- -34
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Offense -1.2
Hustle +2.3
Defense -0.9
Raw total +0.2
Avg player in 22.4m -12.5
Impact -12.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
10
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.4

Maintained his streak of highly efficient interior finishing, punishing late rotations around the basket. Solid positional defense and timely contests (+2.8 Def) helped stabilize the frontcourt. By playing strictly within his role and avoiding forced shots, he generated a steady positive impact.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -26.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Offense +10.3
Hustle +1.4
Defense +2.8
Raw total +14.5
Avg player in 20.0m -11.1
Impact +3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S DeMar DeRozan 19.2m
4
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.0

A severe drop-off in scoring efficiency and an inability to hit his trademark midrange pull-ups tanked his offensive value. He tried to compensate by digging in on defense and fighting through screens (+4.8 Hustle), but the lack of scoring gravity stalled the offense. The opponent's aggressive double-teams effectively neutralized his isolation game.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -62.8
+/- -31
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Offense -1.6
Hustle +4.8
Defense +2.5
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 19.2m -10.7
Impact -5.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Keon Ellis 30.6m
20
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.5

An absolute flamethrower from beyond the arc, his floor-spacing gravity completely opened up the driving lanes for his teammates. He paired this offensive explosion with relentless ball pressure and deflections (+5.5 Hustle). Capitalizing on catch-and-shoot opportunities while hounding opposing guards made him the standout performer.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 6/11 (54.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -33.0
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Offense +12.6
Hustle +5.5
Defense +4.4
Raw total +22.5
Avg player in 30.6m -17.0
Impact +5.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.5

Clanking open perimeter looks and forcing contested drives resulted in a highly inefficient offensive showing that tanked his score. He remained active on the glass and in loose ball situations (+4.5 Hustle), but it wasn't enough to overcome the poor shot selection. The sheer volume of wasted possessions heavily outweighed his energy plays.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.9%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg -8.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Offense +3.9
Hustle +4.5
Defense +1.0
Raw total +9.4
Avg player in 30.6m -16.9
Impact -7.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Devin Carter 21.8m
11
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.7

Elite hustle metrics (+7.3) salvaged what was otherwise a rough shooting night characterized by forced floaters and contested threes. He generated extra possessions through sheer willpower, constantly diving for loose balls and crashing the glass. The relentless motor effectively neutralized the damage from his offensive inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.2%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +5.9
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Offense +3.5
Hustle +7.3
Defense +1.9
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 21.8m -12.0
Impact +0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
7
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

Snapping a streak of highly efficient games, his inability to establish deep post position resulted in a disjointed offensive flow. He provided adequate rim deterrence (+1.8 Def), but his failure to command the paint offensively allowed the defense to stay home on shooters. A passive approach to seeking out contact defined his negative stint.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.8m
Offense +1.1
Hustle +1.0
Defense +1.8
Raw total +3.9
Avg player in 14.8m -8.3
Impact -4.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.3

A massive drop-off from his recent scoring tear, as he settled for heavily contested jumpers early in the shot clock. The lack of offensive rhythm bled into his overall impact, rendering him a net negative despite average defensive positioning. Opponents happily sagged off him, daring him to shoot and stalling the offense.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -50.0
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.0m
Offense +1.1
Hustle +1.1
Defense +1.3
Raw total +3.5
Avg player in 14.0m -7.8
Impact -4.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

Knocked down his perimeter looks to provide a quick offensive jolt, but gave the points right back through defensive limitations. Opposing guards relentlessly targeted him in pick-and-roll switches, neutralizing his spacing value. His one-dimensional skill set made it difficult to keep him on the floor for extended stretches.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +46.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.2
Raw total +3.6
Avg player in 7.8m -4.4
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.4

Failed to make any meaningful imprint on the game during his brief rotation, looking lost in the offensive scheme. Marginal defensive contributions couldn't mask his inability to secure position in the paint. He essentially occupied space without altering the opponent's game plan.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +42.9
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.7m
Offense -0.5
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.6
Raw total +0.3
Avg player in 6.7m -3.7
Impact -3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Dyson Daniels 27.0m
5
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
-2.4

Offensive struggles dragged his overall impact into the negative, as he failed to capitalize on open spot-up opportunities. However, his relentless point-of-attack defense (+6.8 Def) and exceptional loose-ball recovery (+6.5 Hustle) kept the bleeding to a minimum. The stark contrast between his defensive disruption and offensive hesitation defined his outing.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.3%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +61.3
+/- +38
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Offense -0.6
Hustle +6.5
Defense +6.8
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 27.0m -15.1
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jalen Johnson 23.8m
24
pts
10
reb
8
ast
Impact
+17.1

Absolute dominance in transition and half-court creation fueled a staggering overall impact rating. Near-perfect shot selection allowed him to dictate the offensive flow without forcing bad looks. His ability to collapse the defense and kick out to shooters broke the opponent's defensive scheme entirely.

Shooting
FG 9/10 (90.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.0%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +68.4
+/- +39
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Offense +25.2
Hustle +1.1
Defense +4.1
Raw total +30.4
Avg player in 23.8m -13.3
Impact +17.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
13
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.7

Elite rim protection and positional defense (+9.7 Def) anchored his massive positive impact despite a mediocre shooting night. His gravity as a floor spacer opened up driving lanes for guards, evidenced by his high playmaking output from the high post. Altering shots in the paint proved far more valuable than his raw scoring totals.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +64.1
+/- +32
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Offense +9.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense +9.7
Raw total +21.7
Avg player in 23.3m -13.0
Impact +8.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
15
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.3

Highly efficient shooting drove a massive positive impact, capitalizing on open looks to more than double his recent offensive production. His defensive rotations (+5.2 Def) completely shut down penetration on the wing. The combination of elite shot selection and timely closeouts defined his highly productive minutes.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.9%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg +77.4
+/- +41
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Offense +10.5
Hustle +3.0
Defense +5.2
Raw total +18.7
Avg player in 22.2m -12.4
Impact +6.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
14
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.8

A dip in his usual scoring volume was offset by high-level defensive engagement and active hands in passing lanes (+5.6 Def). He consistently blew up pick-and-roll actions, turning defensive stops into transition opportunities. Navigating screens effectively allowed him to maintain a positive overall footprint despite a cold perimeter stroke.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +88.0
+/- +44
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +4.8
Defense +5.6
Raw total +15.9
Avg player in 21.7m -12.1
Impact +3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 4
4
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.6

An absolute terror on the defensive end, using elite lateral quickness to suffocate ball-handlers (+9.7 Def). His relentless energy on 50/50 balls (+6.2 Hustle) generated extra possessions that didn't show up in his own scoring column. Acting as a defensive anchor from the guard position completely defined his positive impact.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -14.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Offense +1.6
Hustle +6.2
Defense +9.7
Raw total +17.5
Avg player in 23.3m -12.9
Impact +4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+0.3

Highly efficient spot-up shooting buoyed his offensive metrics, but a lack of defensive resistance (-0.4 Def) nearly erased those gains. He struggled to stay in front of quicker guards on the perimeter, giving back points on the other end. Hitting timely corner threes kept his overall impact barely above water.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 91.7%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -13.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Offense +11.5
Hustle +0.8
Defense -0.4
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 20.9m -11.6
Impact +0.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Luke Kennard 20.8m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.5

Spacing the floor with lethal off-ball movement forced defenders to overcommit, opening up the offense entirely. Surprisingly robust defensive positioning (+6.2 Def) prevented opponents from targeting him on switches. The threat of his jumper alone dictated the defensive rotations during his entire stint.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 81.3%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -16.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Offense +11.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +6.2
Raw total +19.1
Avg player in 20.8m -11.6
Impact +7.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
21
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.5

Punished mismatches in the paint and stretched the floor effectively to generate a massive box score impact. His decisive rolls to the rim and unexpected perimeter touch completely warped the opponent's drop coverage. Capitalizing on nearly every offensive touch made him the focal point of the second unit's success.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 99.8%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg +28.1
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Offense +16.1
Hustle +3.2
Defense +2.7
Raw total +22.0
Avg player in 20.6m -11.5
Impact +10.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.3

Complete offensive invisibility and poor shot selection from deep dragged his overall value into the red. He salvaged his minutes primarily through excellent weak-side rim protection (+6.5 Def) and active closeouts. The inability to finish around the basket severely limited his effectiveness despite the defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 7.8%
Net Rtg -32.6
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Offense +1.6
Hustle +1.9
Defense +6.5
Raw total +10.0
Avg player in 20.4m -11.3
Impact -1.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.1

A complete lack of physical engagement across the board resulted in zero hustle stats and a negative overall impact. While he knocked down a couple of perimeter looks, he was a ghost defensively and failed to impact the glass. Floating on the perimeter without contributing to the dirty work made him a liability during his short stint.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 31.8%
Net Rtg -46.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Offense +1.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.1
Raw total +1.4
Avg player in 8.1m -4.5
Impact -3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Asa Newell 7.8m
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.6

Maximized a brief rotational stint by taking only high-value shots and executing defensive assignments flawlessly. His ability to seamlessly switch on the perimeter (+2.1 Def) kept the defensive shell intact. Perfect offensive execution in limited touches provided a solid, stabilizing presence.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 133.0%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -46.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Offense +3.0
Hustle +0.8
Defense +2.1
Raw total +5.9
Avg player in 7.8m -4.3
Impact +1.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1