Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
CLE lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
CLE 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Bridges Hard 4/16 -7.5
Brunson 6/14 -0.4
Anunoby 6/13 -2.9
Towns 8/11 +6.2
Kolek Hard 3/7 +1.0
Shamet Hard 5/6 +7.3
McBride Hard 4/6 +4.8
Robinson Open 4/6 -0.4
Clarkson Hard 1/6 -3.2
Hart Hard 2/5 -0.4

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 9/18 +5.7
Mobley 7/15 -2.6
Harden Hard 2/8 -4.1
Bryant 4/7 +1.8
Strus 2/6 -2.1
Tyson 1/6 -5.1
Allen Open 3/5 -0.2
Merrill 2/4 +0.6
Ellis Hard 1/3 -0.1
Tomlin Open 1/2 -0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
CLE
48/98 Field Goals 32/77
49.0% Field Goal % 41.6%
19/43 3-Pointers 11/40
44.2% 3-Point % 27.5%
15/20 Free Throws 18/22
75.0% Free Throw % 81.8%
60.9% True Shooting % 53.6%
67 Total Rebounds 38
20 Offensive 6
40 Defensive 27
33 Assists 21
2.20 Assist/TO Ratio 0.95
13 Turnovers 22
15 Steals 9
2 Blocks 4
20 Fouls 18
50 Points in Paint 36
33 Fast Break Pts 9
34 Points off TOs 18
32 Second Chance Pts 5
58 Bench Points 24
45 Largest Lead 6
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Karl-Anthony Towns
19 PTS · 14 REB · 3 AST · 26.0 MIN
+23.78
2
OG Anunoby
17 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST · 27.0 MIN
+17.79
3
Landry Shamet
16 PTS · 0 REB · 2 AST · 19.0 MIN
+17.77
4
Miles McBride
11 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 16.7 MIN
+17.0
5
Donovan Mitchell
31 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 31.5 MIN
+15.53
6
Jalen Brunson
15 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 30.9 MIN
+11.52
7
Josh Hart
6 PTS · 11 REB · 6 AST · 23.6 MIN
+11.07
8
Jarrett Allen
6 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 25.6 MIN
+10.28
9
Mitchell Robinson
8 PTS · 10 REB · 0 AST · 17.8 MIN
+9.9
10
Evan Mobley
15 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST · 33.3 MIN
+9.19
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:11 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 130–93
Q4 0:35 T. Bryant 24' 3PT (10 PTS) (C. Porter Jr. 3 AST) 130–93
Q4 0:47 T. Kolek 15' fadeaway Jump Shot (8 PTS) 130–90
Q4 1:01 C. Porter Jr. bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (3 TO) 128–90
Q4 1:04 C. Porter Jr. REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 128–90
Q4 1:06 MISS T. Kolek 10' driving floating Shot 128–90
Q4 1:17 T. Bryant driving Layup (7 PTS) (C. Porter Jr. 2 AST) 128–90
Q4 1:27 T. Bryant REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 128–88
Q4 1:30 MISS P. Dadiet 26' 3PT 128–88
Q4 1:40 M. Diawara REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 128–88
Q4 1:42 MISS T. Bryant 25' 3PT 128–88
Q4 1:59 A. Hukporti putback DUNK (2 PTS) 128–88
Q4 2:00 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 126–88
Q4 2:06 MISS J. Clarkson 25' 3PT 126–88
Q4 2:22 K. Ellis Free Throw 2 of 2 (5 PTS) 126–88

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S Evan Mobley 33.3m
15
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+7.4

This was an uncharacteristically ineffective performance from Mobley, who was below his season averages in points, rebounds, and blocks. His defensive impact was notably poor, as opponents shot 53% when he was the nearest defender, contributing to his game-worst -30 plus/minus.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.6%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -36.3
+/- -30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +7.9
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S James Harden 32.9m
12
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.3

A complete lack of shooting touch defined Harden's night, as he went 0/6 from three-point range and just 2/8 from the field. This inefficiency, coupled with 5 turnovers, resulted in a negative offensive contribution (-0.8 Offense component) despite getting to the free-throw line 9 times.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 50.2%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -25.4
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
31
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.8

Mitchell served as the lone offensive engine, exploding for 31 points on efficient 5/9 shooting from three. This solo scoring effort was the clear driver of his performance (+17.2 Offense component), but it came with minimal playmaking (1 assist) and 4 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 36.1%
Net Rtg -30.3
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +23.8
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Jarrett Allen 25.6m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.9

Allen was largely a non-factor on offense and was completely overwhelmed on the defensive end. Opponents were nearly perfect when he was the primary defender, shooting a blistering 8/9 (89%), which defined his highly negative impact on the game.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 88.9%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
S Max Strus 21.9m
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

Strus had a quiet offensive night, with his scoring and assist numbers well below his season averages. His value was primarily driven by his defensive effort, where he logged 8 contests and held opponents to 38% shooting, reflected in a team-leading +3.5 Hustle component.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg -21.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Sam Merrill 17.6m
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.8

Merrill failed to provide his typical sharpshooting spark, attempting only two three-pointers in his 18 minutes on the court. His limited offensive contribution was offset by defensive struggles, which resulted in a -1.9 Defense component rating.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -38.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaylon Tyson 16.0m
2
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.1

A frigid shooting performance drove Tyson's struggles, as he went 0/4 from deep and 1/6 from the field overall. This inefficiency, combined with 2 turnovers, led to a negative -3.6 Offense component and a -21 plus/minus in his 16 minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg -68.1
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Keon Ellis 16.0m
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.8

Despite low usage on offense (1/3 FG), Ellis made a positive two-way impact in his 16 minutes. His contributions were balanced between efficient scoring (+4.2 Offense component) and active defense, where he recorded 3 deflections and a steal (+3.9 Defense component).

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg -58.8
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Dean Wade 12.5m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.2

Wade was a complete non-factor on offense, failing to score on his single shot attempt in 12 minutes. His value came exclusively from defensive activity, where he tallied 2 steals, 1 block, and 3 deflections to generate a strong +6.0 Defense component.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.4%
Net Rtg -56.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-15.4

Porter Jr.'s performance was defined by careless ball-handling during his 9 minutes as a backup playmaker. He negated his 3 assists by committing 3 turnovers without attempting a shot, leading to a negative -4.3 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -27.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

Proctor struggled to contribute positively in his 9 minutes, failing to score on two attempts and committing a turnover. His offensive struggles (-2.7 Offense component) were paired with defensive lapses, as opponents shot 4/6 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -27.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.1

Bryant provided an immediate scoring burst in his 9 minutes off the bench, more than doubling his season average with 10 points. This instant offense, which included hitting 2 three-pointers, was the sole driver of his performance, registering a +7.4 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 35.0%
Net Rtg -27.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.1

In a brief 7-minute appearance, Tomlin offered a minor offensive lift by making one of his two shots for 2 points. This limited but efficient contribution was enough to register a +3.0 Offense component, though he did little else to impact the game.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -20.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.9m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 30.9m
15
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.5

This was an unusually quiet scoring night for Brunson, whose 15 points were well below his season average. The defining characteristic of his game was flawless ball security, as he committed 0 turnovers (avg 2.2) while still generating a positive offensive flow (+11.9 Offense component).

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +24.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Mikal Bridges 30.1m
15
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.6

A brutal shooting night (4/16 FG) was salvaged by lockdown defense and an uptick in playmaking. Bridges held his defensive matchups to just 1/6 shooting and generated value with 5 assists, contributing to a positive +5.4 Offense component despite his own scoring inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 4/16 (25.0%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.2%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +15.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S OG Anunoby 27.1m
17
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+12.3

Anunoby provided a strong two-way performance, highlighted by his defensive work where opponents shot just 4/10 when he was the primary defender. While his 3-point shot wasn't falling (1/5), he generated significant value through his overall offensive contributions (+16.1 Offense component) and disruptive defense (+5.7 Defense component).

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.6%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +21.8
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
19
pts
14
reb
3
ast
Impact
+26.2

Ruthless efficiency defined this performance, as Towns scored 19 points on a perfect 3/3 from deep and 8/11 shooting overall. He paired his massive offensive contribution (+16.8 Offense component) with dominant work on the glass (14 rebounds) and stout defense, holding opponents to 36% shooting when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 86.4%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +44.6
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +14.9
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
S Josh Hart 23.6m
6
pts
11
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.9

Despite scoring well below his average with just 6 points, Hart drove winning through his ancillary contributions, grabbing 11 rebounds and dishing 6 assists (both above his season marks). His positive impact was rooted in strong defensive play (+6.1 Defense component) and efficient offensive facilitation (+7.9 Offense component) rather than individual scoring.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +38.5
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +13.0
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
16
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.8

An explosive and flawless shooting display defined Shamet's night, as he poured in 16 points without a single miss from the field (5/6), three-point line (4/4), or free-throw line (2/2). This perfect efficiency fueled a massive +16.7 contribution to the offense in his 19 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 4/4 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 116.3%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +67.9
+/- +28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.0m
Scoring +15.3
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.9

Robinson's value came from his typical dominance in the paint, where he scored an efficient 8 points on 4/6 shooting and grabbed 10 rebounds. His performance was a blend of efficient offensive finishing (+7.3 Offense component) and solid interior defense (+6.4 Defense component) in his 18 minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +36.8
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.8m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +11.7
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.3

McBride provided a massive spark off the bench with hyper-efficient, two-way play in just 17 minutes. He shot 3/5 from deep and recorded 3 steals with 0 turnovers, driving his value through both a +10.2 Offense component and a disruptive +7.0 Defense component.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 91.7%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg +80.8
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +5.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.4

In just 10 minutes, Alvarado made his presence felt primarily on the defensive end, grabbing 2 steals and holding his matchup scoreless on 1 attempt. His value was concentrated in defensive disruption, reflected in a +3.9 Defense component, despite committing 2 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +95.5
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.1m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.5

Clarkson struggled to make any positive impression in his brief 9-minute stint, shooting just 1/6 from the field. His negative offensive contribution (-1.9 Offense) was compounded by defensive issues, as opponents were a perfect 2/2 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 30.4%
Net Rtg +27.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
5
reb
1
ast

Hukporti made the most of his 8 minutes, contributing primarily through his work on the glass where he secured 5 rebounds. He was efficient in his limited touches, making his only field goal attempt and adding a screen assist to provide solid energy off the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.5%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.1

In his 8 minutes of action, Diawara was a non-factor as a scorer, failing to attempt a single shot. While he chipped in with 3 rebounds and 2 assists, his contribution was minimal and slightly negative on the offensive end (-0.9 Offense component) due to a turnover.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.5%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.5

Kolek provided a quick scoring punch in his limited 8 minutes on the floor, doubling his season average with 8 points. His performance was driven entirely by this offensive spark, knocking down 2 of 3 three-pointers to generate a +6.5 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 31.8%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

Dadiet packed efficient production into just 7 minutes, scoring 6 points on 2/4 shooting and adding a steal. His brief appearance was impactful on both ends, generating positive value through both his offensive (+5.3) and defensive (+3.0) contributions.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 27.8%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.9m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0