LAL

2025-26 Season

AUSTIN REAVES

Los Angeles Lakers | Guard | 6-5
Austin Reaves
23.3 PPG
4.7 RPG
5.5 APG
34.5 MPG
+3.5 Impact

Reaves produces at an above average rate for a 34-minute workload. 3.0 turnovers per game cost 5.8 points of value nightly.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+3.5
Scoring +16.1
Points 23.3 PPG × +1.00 = +23.3
Missed 2PT 3.5/g × -0.78 = -2.7
Missed 3PT 4.1/g × -0.87 = -3.6
Missed FT 0.9/g × -1.00 = -0.9
Creation +4.3
Assists 5.5/g × +0.50 = +2.8
Off. Rebounds 1.2/g × +1.26 = +1.5
Turnovers -5.8
Turnovers 3.0/g × -1.95 = -5.8
Defense +2.1
Steals 1.1/g × +2.30 = +2.5
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 3.5/g × +0.30 = +1.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.3
Contested Shots 3.0/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 2.2/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.3/g × +2.70 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.4/g uncredited × +2.70 = +1.0
Raw Impact +21.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −17.5
Net Impact
+3.5
94th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 94th
23.3 PPG
Efficiency 97th
63.6% TS
Playmaking 87th
5.5 APG
Rebounding 85th
4.7 RPG
Rim Protection 41th
0.11/min
Hustle 75th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 15th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Austin Reaves opened the 2025-26 campaign by erupting into a high-usage offensive hub, transforming into an aggressive scoring weapon who occasionally let his own ambition sabotage his value. When his shot selection aligned with his aggression, the results were terrifying. Look no further than his 10/26 vs SAC masterpiece, where lethal perimeter shot-making and impeccable decision-making generated 51 points and a staggering +36.1 impact score. Yet, that same limitless green light sometimes actively hurt his team. During his 11/02 vs MIA outing, Reaves dropped 26 points but posted a -3.5 impact because he stubbornly forced ten missed threes early in the shot clock, completely wasting his own playmaking brilliance. Conversely, he still found ways to win on quiet shooting nights. In the 12/25 vs HOU matchup, he managed just 12 points but still earned a +3.1 impact by leaning on crafty foul-drawing and decisive secondary playmaking to keep the offense humming.

This mid-season stretch defined Austin Reaves as a wildly volatile creator who eventually grabbed the keys to the starting offense. His ceiling as a primary scorer exploded on 02/05 vs PHI, where he dropped 35 points on 12-of-17 shooting to post a staggering +18.3 impact score. Yet, his overall effectiveness routinely swung on the pendulum of his decision-making. During the 02/28 vs GSW matchup, he managed 18 points on an efficient 7-of-11 from the floor, but a barrage of offensive fouls and careless passing reads completely neutralized his value, leaving him with a mediocre +0.6 impact. Conversely, he found ways to dictate games without dominating the box score, like his gritty performance on 03/05 vs DEN. Despite scoring just 16 points, he generated a robust +7.1 impact score by relentlessly chasing down 50/50 balls and playing suffocating perimeter defense. When he balances his aggressive downhill drives with disciplined passing, Reaves shifts from a situational sparkplug into a legitimate offensive engine.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Reaves's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~9 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Reaves consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +5.9, second-half: +1.2. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 52 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Thompson 72.5 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 5
A. Nembhard 57.6 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
K. George 56.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
T. Murphy III 49.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
D. Mitchell 48.5 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
B. Podziemski 47.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
J. McDaniels 47.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 17
A. Mitchell 40.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 39.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
T. Camara 38.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DiVincenzo 75.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 62.5%
PPP 0.22
PTS 17
K. George 53.4 poss
FG% 81.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.37
PTS 20
J. Fears 47.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12
D. Mitchell 46.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
B. Podziemski 39.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
S. Bey 38.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
T. Eason 37.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
J. Bouyea 34.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 11
D. Schröder 34.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
A. Nembhard 33.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

51
Games
23.3
PPG
4.7
RPG
5.5
APG
1.1
SPG
0.4
BPG
49.0
FG%
36.0
3P%
87.1
FT%
34.5
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played