Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DET lead CLE lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
CLE 2P — 3P —
DET 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 164 attempts

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 9/19 +4.3
Harden Hard 6/15 -1.1
Strus 7/13 +3.4
Mobley 6/11 +1.9
Schröder Open 3/6 -0.3
Ellis Hard 1/4 -1.3
Allen 1/4 -2.0
Bryant 1/4 -2.2
Wade 2/3 +1.3
Tyson Hard 0/1 -0.9

DET DET Shot-making Δ

Cunningham 6/19 -5.7
Harris 6/14 -1.4
Jenkins 5/13 -4.1
Robinson Hard 7/12 +6.9
Duren Open 4/11 -6.6
Thompson Open 4/6 -0.2
Holland II 2/3 +1.6
Green Hard 1/3 -0.1
Stewart Open 2/2 +1.2
LeVert Open 0/1 -1.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CLE
DET
36/80 Field Goals 37/84
45.0% Field Goal % 44.0%
14/38 3-Pointers 10/26
36.8% 3-Point % 38.5%
15/16 Free Throws 27/35
93.8% Free Throw % 77.1%
58.0% True Shooting % 55.8%
47 Total Rebounds 53
11 Offensive 16
30 Defensive 29
23 Assists 23
1.15 Assist/TO Ratio 1.92
19 Turnovers 11
7 Steals 12
5 Blocks 3
22 Fouls 18
44 Points in Paint 44
6 Fast Break Pts 15
16 Points off TOs 31
11 Second Chance Pts 19
35 Bench Points 27
5 Largest Lead 18
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Daniss Jenkins
12 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 28.8 MIN
+17.7
2
Jalen Duren
11 PTS · 12 REB · 4 AST · 35.2 MIN
+16.71
3
Duncan Robinson
19 PTS · 0 REB · 2 AST · 27.9 MIN
+16.41
4
Tobias Harris
20 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 38.8 MIN
+16.18
5
Evan Mobley
14 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 34.8 MIN
+15.5
6
Max Strus
19 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 27.6 MIN
+15.5
7
Ausar Thompson
11 PTS · 8 REB · 5 AST · 32.8 MIN
+15.44
8
Donovan Mitchell
23 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 35.3 MIN
+10.98
9
James Harden
22 PTS · 8 REB · 7 AST · 35.0 MIN
+10.43
10
Cade Cunningham
23 PTS · 3 REB · 7 AST · 41.7 MIN
+10.24
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:05 C. Cunningham REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 101–111
Q4 0:07 MISS J. Harden 28' pullup 3PT 101–111
Q4 0:17 D. Jenkins running DUNK (12 PTS) 101–111
Q4 0:19 D. Jenkins REBOUND (Off:3 Def:4) 101–109
Q4 0:24 MISS D. Mitchell turnaround fadeaway 3PT 101–109
Q4 0:26 D. Jenkins Free Throw 2 of 2 (10 PTS) 101–109
Q4 0:26 D. Jenkins Free Throw 1 of 2 (9 PTS) 101–108
Q4 0:26 J. Harden personal FOUL (3 PF) (Jenkins 2 FT) 101–107
Q4 0:32 D. Mitchell 30' 3PT fadeaway (23 PTS) (D. Wade 1 AST) 101–107
Q4 0:38 T. Harris Free Throw 2 of 2 (20 PTS) 98–107
Q4 0:38 T. Harris Free Throw 1 of 2 (19 PTS) 98–106
Q4 0:38 E. Mobley shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Harris 2 FT) 98–105
Q4 0:45 D. Jenkins REBOUND (Off:3 Def:3) 98–105
Q4 0:48 MISS T. Harris 3PT 98–105
Q4 1:05 D. Jenkins STEAL (4 STL) 98–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 41.7m
23
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+4.5

Cunningham struggled mightily with his shooting efficiency (6-of-19 FG) but salvaged his +9.9 offensive credit by aggressively attacking the rim and drawing fouls (9-of-11 FT). His defensive engagement was a major bright spot, generating 4 deflections and holding his matchup to 40% shooting for a +6.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 48.2%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.7m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +4.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Tobias Harris 38.8m
20
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+17.7

Harris weaponized his defensive activity to swing this game, racking up 5 deflections and holding his matchup to a frigid 4-of-13 from the field for a +7.0 defensive credit. He also bullied his way to the line (7-of-8 FT), ensuring his offensive impact (+12.4) remained high despite a clunky 1-of-5 night from deep.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +6.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +10.2
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jalen Duren 35.2m
11
pts
12
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.5

Duren's relentless interior motor defined his performance, highlighted by a staggering 21 shot contests and a +9.6 defensive credit. While his finishing was unusually poor (4-of-11 FG), his playmaking out of the post (4 assists) and elite rim protection kept his overall value sky-high.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +23.3
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +13.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S Ausar Thompson 32.8m
11
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.8

Thompson operated as a highly efficient connective hub, pacing his +15.4 offensive credit with 5 assists and 67% shooting from the floor. He was equally disruptive on the other end, smothering his primary matchup (2-of-7 shooting) to anchor a stout +4.8 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +8.2
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Duncan Robinson 27.9m
19
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.3

Robinson was an absolute flamethrower from the perimeter, burying 5-of-8 triples to generate a massive +15.0 offensive credit. However, his defensive limitations were glaringly exposed, as his primary matchup torched him for 8-of-11 shooting.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.4%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +7.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.5

Jenkins compensated for a rocky shooting night (0-of-3 from deep) by unleashing absolute chaos on the defensive end. His 4 steals and 4 deflections fueled a massive +10.5 defensive credit, proving his worth as a disruptive perimeter pest.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.2%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +7.0
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.6

Stewart made the most of his limited touches, converting both of his field goal attempts to post a solid +5.2 offensive credit. He also set sturdy screens (3 screen assists) to help free up shooters, though his 2 turnovers slightly dampened an otherwise efficient outing.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -29.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Holland II provided a brief but efficient scoring punch off the bench, hitting 2-of-3 shots to generate a +4.5 offensive credit. However, he struggled to contain his assignment defensively, allowing his matchup to shoot a blistering 67% from the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +38.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.5

LeVert was a complete offensive ghost during his 9 minutes, failing to score and registering a -0.8 offensive credit. His minimal involvement extended across the box score, continuing a brutal late-season slump.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg +68.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.0m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Green was largely invisible during his three minutes of action, managing just one made three-pointer on three attempts. His defensive presence was equally lacking, as his matchup easily converted 2-of-3 shots against him.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -66.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
23
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.3

Mitchell carried the scoring load with a solid 4-of-10 mark from deep, driving his +10.9 offensive credit. However, his overall playmaking was muted (just 2 assists) and his defensive impact was limited, allowing his primary matchup to shoot 56% from the floor.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.8%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S James Harden 35.0m
22
pts
8
reb
7
ast
Impact
+7.6

Harden's performance was a high-wire act of aggressive foul-drawing (9-of-9 FT) and sloppy ball security. The 7 turnovers (↑ avg 3.9) significantly dragged down his efficiency, though he compensated defensively by stifling his primary matchup (3-of-10 shooting) to earn a +5.3 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -8.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +15.8
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +10.2
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -15.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 7
S Evan Mobley 34.8m
14
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+11.9

Mobley showcased his evolving offensive hub capabilities, leveraging his playmaking (5 assists, ↑ avg) to generate a robust +14.4 offensive credit. He protected the rim effectively with 9 contests and a pair of blocks, though his individual matchup found some success shooting 56% against him.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -26.3
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +11.4
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S Dean Wade 27.8m
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Wade provided steady, low-usage value on the margins without forcing the issue offensively. His clean decision-making (0 turnovers) and efficient shooting (2-of-3) fueled a solid +6.6 offensive credit, while his three deflections added subtle disruption on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 4.7%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jarrett Allen 18.4m
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.9

A stark lack of offensive involvement defined Allen's quiet night, as he managed just two points on four attempts (-85% vs avg). His minimal +0.1 offensive credit and below-average rebounding (3 boards) reflect a passive outing where he struggled to impose his usual physical will inside.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -5.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Max Strus 27.6m
19
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.7

Strus broke out of a recent shooting slump by burying 4-of-8 from beyond the arc, fueling a massive +14.5 offensive credit. He was equally impressive on the other end, suffocating his defensive matchup into a miserable 5-of-19 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.7%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -19.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 26.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaylon Tyson 17.6m
0
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.5

Tyson was a complete non-factor offensively, going scoreless on a single shot attempt to generate a -2.2 offensive credit. He salvaged some value through his hustle on the glass (5 rebounds) and by locking down his matchup, who managed just 1-of-4 shooting against him.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +32.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.7

Schröder managed to score efficiently (3-of-6 FG) but completely sabotaged his own value with careless ball-handling. His 4 turnovers (↑ avg 1.3) stunted the offense, while a negative defensive credit (-0.8) showed he struggled to contain his perimeter assignments.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Keon Ellis 10.9m
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.3

Ellis couldn't find his stroke from deep (1-of-3) but made his presence felt entirely on the defensive end. His two steals and stout on-ball coverage yielded a robust +5.2 defensive credit, proving he can impact the game even when his shot isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -18.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.9m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

Bryant struggled to find any rhythm during his short stint, missing three of his four shot attempts and failing to grab a single rebound. His defensive presence was practically non-existent, allowing his primary matchup to torch him for 5-of-7 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.3

Merrill was completely erased from the offensive game plan, failing to log a single field goal attempt during his brief 6 minutes of action. The resulting -1.4 offensive credit highlights a totally hollow shift where his usual perimeter threat was entirely neutralized.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -71.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1