GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DET Detroit Pistons
S Cade Cunningham 41.7m
23
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+7.3

Cunningham struggled mightily with his shooting efficiency (6-of-19 FG) but salvaged his +9.9 offensive credit by aggressively attacking the rim and drawing fouls (9-of-11 FT). His defensive engagement was a major bright spot, generating 4 deflections and holding his matchup to 40% shooting for a +6.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 48.2%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.7m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +4.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Tobias Harris 38.8m
20
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.3

Harris weaponized his defensive activity to swing this game, racking up 5 deflections and holding his matchup to a frigid 4-of-13 from the field for a +7.0 defensive credit. He also bullied his way to the line (7-of-8 FT), ensuring his offensive impact (+12.4) remained high despite a clunky 1-of-5 night from deep.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +6.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +10.2
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jalen Duren 35.2m
11
pts
12
reb
4
ast
Impact
+10.0

Duren's relentless interior motor defined his performance, highlighted by a staggering 21 shot contests and a +9.6 defensive credit. While his finishing was unusually poor (4-of-11 FG), his playmaking out of the post (4 assists) and elite rim protection kept his overall value sky-high.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +23.3
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +13.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S Ausar Thompson 32.8m
11
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+8.9

Thompson operated as a highly efficient connective hub, pacing his +15.4 offensive credit with 5 assists and 67% shooting from the floor. He was equally disruptive on the other end, smothering his primary matchup (2-of-7 shooting) to anchor a stout +4.8 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +8.2
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Duncan Robinson 27.9m
19
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.2

Robinson was an absolute flamethrower from the perimeter, burying 5-of-8 triples to generate a massive +15.0 offensive credit. However, his defensive limitations were glaringly exposed, as his primary matchup torched him for 8-of-11 shooting.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.4%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +7.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.1

Jenkins compensated for a rocky shooting night (0-of-3 from deep) by unleashing absolute chaos on the defensive end. His 4 steals and 4 deflections fueled a massive +10.5 defensive credit, proving his worth as a disruptive perimeter pest.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.2%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +7.0
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.6

Stewart made the most of his limited touches, converting both of his field goal attempts to post a solid +5.2 offensive credit. He also set sturdy screens (3 screen assists) to help free up shooters, though his 2 turnovers slightly dampened an otherwise efficient outing.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -29.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.8

Holland II provided a brief but efficient scoring punch off the bench, hitting 2-of-3 shots to generate a +4.5 offensive credit. However, he struggled to contain his assignment defensively, allowing his matchup to shoot a blistering 67% from the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +38.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.4

LeVert was a complete offensive ghost during his 9 minutes, failing to score and registering a -0.8 offensive credit. His minimal involvement extended across the box score, continuing a brutal late-season slump.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg +68.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.0m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.1

Green was largely invisible during his three minutes of action, managing just one made three-pointer on three attempts. His defensive presence was equally lacking, as his matchup easily converted 2-of-3 shots against him.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -66.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
23
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.9

Mitchell carried the scoring load with a solid 4-of-10 mark from deep, driving his +10.9 offensive credit. However, his overall playmaking was muted (just 2 assists) and his defensive impact was limited, allowing his primary matchup to shoot 56% from the floor.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.8%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S James Harden 35.0m
22
pts
8
reb
7
ast
Impact
+10.1

Harden's performance was a high-wire act of aggressive foul-drawing (9-of-9 FT) and sloppy ball security. The 7 turnovers (↑ avg 3.9) significantly dragged down his efficiency, though he compensated defensively by stifling his primary matchup (3-of-10 shooting) to earn a +5.3 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -8.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +15.8
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +10.2
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -15.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 7
S Evan Mobley 34.8m
14
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+13.9

Mobley showcased his evolving offensive hub capabilities, leveraging his playmaking (5 assists, ↑ avg) to generate a robust +14.4 offensive credit. He protected the rim effectively with 9 contests and a pair of blocks, though his individual matchup found some success shooting 56% against him.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -26.3
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +11.4
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S Dean Wade 27.8m
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.4

Wade provided steady, low-usage value on the margins without forcing the issue offensively. His clean decision-making (0 turnovers) and efficient shooting (2-of-3) fueled a solid +6.6 offensive credit, while his three deflections added subtle disruption on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 4.7%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jarrett Allen 18.4m
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.9

A stark lack of offensive involvement defined Allen's quiet night, as he managed just two points on four attempts (-85% vs avg). His minimal +0.1 offensive credit and below-average rebounding (3 boards) reflect a passive outing where he struggled to impose his usual physical will inside.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense -5.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Max Strus 27.6m
19
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.7

Strus broke out of a recent shooting slump by burying 4-of-8 from beyond the arc, fueling a massive +14.5 offensive credit. He was equally impressive on the other end, suffocating his defensive matchup into a miserable 5-of-19 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.7%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -19.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 26.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaylon Tyson 17.6m
0
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.2

Tyson was a complete non-factor offensively, going scoreless on a single shot attempt to generate a -2.2 offensive credit. He salvaged some value through his hustle on the glass (5 rebounds) and by locking down his matchup, who managed just 1-of-4 shooting against him.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +32.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.0

Schröder managed to score efficiently (3-of-6 FG) but completely sabotaged his own value with careless ball-handling. His 4 turnovers (↑ avg 1.3) stunted the offense, while a negative defensive credit (-0.8) showed he struggled to contain his perimeter assignments.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Keon Ellis 10.9m
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.2

Ellis couldn't find his stroke from deep (1-of-3) but made his presence felt entirely on the defensive end. His two steals and stout on-ball coverage yielded a robust +5.2 defensive credit, proving he can impact the game even when his shot isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -18.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.9m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

Bryant struggled to find any rhythm during his short stint, missing three of his four shot attempts and failing to grab a single rebound. His defensive presence was practically non-existent, allowing his primary matchup to torch him for 5-of-7 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.3

Merrill was completely erased from the offensive game plan, failing to log a single field goal attempt during his brief 6 minutes of action. The resulting -1.4 offensive credit highlights a totally hollow shift where his usual perimeter threat was entirely neutralized.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -71.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1