GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 32.2m
20
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.8

Defensive apathy (-1.2) and likely givebacks in transition tanked a seemingly productive scoring night. The offensive volume simply couldn't cover up the defensive bleeding during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 26.6%
Net Rtg +13.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Offense +9.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.2
Raw total +9.6
Avg player in 32.2m -15.4
Impact -5.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
23
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+0.6

Brutal offensive inefficiency was surprisingly bailed out by elite defensive engagement (+8.0). Despite clanking away from deep, his effort on the other end of the floor kept his overall impact above water.

Shooting
FG 5/18 (27.8%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 11/14 (78.6%)
Advanced
TS% 47.6%
USG% 35.5%
Net Rtg +34.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +5.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense +8.0
Raw total +15.6
Avg player in 31.4m -15.0
Impact +0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jarrett Allen 28.8m
19
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+21.7

An absolute masterclass in interior control drove a staggering +21.7 impact score. Near-perfect finishing at the rim and relentless hustle (+6.2) completely overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 85.7%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +18.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Offense +20.4
Hustle +6.2
Defense +8.8
Raw total +35.4
Avg player in 28.8m -13.7
Impact +21.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Dean Wade 24.7m
11
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+16.2

Perimeter marksmanship and suffocating defense (+12.0) combined for a spectacular two-way showing. Spacing the floor effectively allowed him to punish defensive rotations while locking down his own assignments.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +40.1
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Offense +12.5
Hustle +3.5
Defense +12.0
Raw total +28.0
Avg player in 24.7m -11.8
Impact +16.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 0
S Evan Mobley 24.5m
12
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.2

Steady, efficient finishing in the paint anchored a solid positive rating. His reliable defensive rotations (+3.6) ensured his minutes remained a net positive for the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.2%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg +9.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Offense +9.0
Hustle +2.3
Defense +3.6
Raw total +14.9
Avg player in 24.5m -11.7
Impact +3.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaylon Tyson 26.9m
12
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.8

Balanced two-way play kept his impact comfortably in the green. Efficient shot selection and active defensive rotations (+5.2) proved highly effective during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.5%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg +21.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Offense +8.1
Hustle +2.4
Defense +5.2
Raw total +15.7
Avg player in 26.9m -12.9
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.3

Excellent point-of-attack defense (+5.8) was entirely wasted by a dreadful shooting performance. Forcing bad looks on offense dragged his overall impact into the negative despite his defensive tenacity.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +21.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Offense -0.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.8
Raw total +7.7
Avg player in 21.3m -10.0
Impact -2.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Sam Merrill 21.0m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.1

Missing every single look from beyond the arc resulted in a catastrophic -14.1 rating. Without his perimeter shot falling, he offered virtually nothing else to justify his floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +31.7
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Offense -5.0
Hustle +1.1
Defense -0.1
Raw total -4.0
Avg player in 21.0m -10.1
Impact -14.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Keon Ellis 15.8m
4
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.7

Efficient finishing couldn't prevent a slight negative rating during his rotational minutes. The defensive metrics were solid, but overall lineup struggles likely dragged down his total impact.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -28.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Offense +3.6
Hustle +1.1
Defense +1.2
Raw total +5.9
Avg player in 15.8m -7.6
Impact -1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.9

Managed a slightly positive rating in a brief late-game appearance. Avoided negative plays while providing a tiny boost in hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +1.3
Hustle +1.0
Defense -0.1
Raw total +2.2
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact +0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.0

Instantly capitalized on garbage-time minutes with aggressive shooting. A quick perimeter conversion spiked his box score metrics in a microscopic sample size.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +4.1
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +4.3
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.8

Burned off the final minutes of the clock without making an offensive dent. A completely empty stint resulted in a negligible negative score.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +0.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.5
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.1

A single missed shot defined a very brief rotational cameo. Failed to register any positive hustle or defensive metrics to offset the offensive blank.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense -0.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -0.8
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.8

Logged virtually empty minutes at the end of the game. A missed attempt and slight defensive minus pushed his score slightly below neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense -0.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total -0.5
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -1.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 36.0m
20
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-10.6

High-volume chucking and defensive liabilities (-0.4) severely punished the team while he was on the floor. The sheer number of empty possessions from missed jumpers drove his overall impact into double-digit negatives.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 45.3%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -26.5
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Offense +5.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.4
Raw total +6.6
Avg player in 36.0m -17.2
Impact -10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 61.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S OG Anunoby 34.3m
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.6

A severe offensive drop-off cratered his value in this matchup. While his point-of-attack defense remained stout, an inability to convert open looks created a massive negative swing during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Offense -1.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense +3.7
Raw total +5.8
Avg player in 34.3m -16.4
Impact -10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 31.7m
18
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.7

Elite two-way activity masked a highly inefficient shooting performance. He kept his impact firmly in the green by generating extra possessions through relentless hustle (+4.2) and suffocating perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg -15.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Offense +9.8
Hustle +4.2
Defense +6.8
Raw total +20.8
Avg player in 31.7m -15.1
Impact +5.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
14
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.8

Flawless shot execution anchored a highly efficient, albeit lower-volume, offensive night. His defensive positioning (+7.7) proved just as vital to the positive impact as his perfect finishing around the rim.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 103.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +3.4
Defense +7.7
Raw total +16.6
Avg player in 29.1m -13.8
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 5
S Josh Hart 26.2m
10
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.5

Strong defensive metrics (+4.8) were completely undone by poor perimeter shot selection. Clanking away from deep dragged his overall impact into the red despite a solid foundation of active hustle plays.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.5%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Offense +0.9
Hustle +2.3
Defense +4.8
Raw total +8.0
Avg player in 26.2m -12.5
Impact -4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
5
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.3

Pesky on-ball pressure (+3.6 defense) couldn't salvage a negative overall rating. Poor offensive execution and missed perimeter looks ultimately outweighed his defensive disruptions.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -2.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Offense +1.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.6
Raw total +6.1
Avg player in 21.9m -10.4
Impact -4.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.0

Total inability to connect from the perimeter resulted in a disastrous -14.0 impact score. Offering zero hustle stats to offset the missed shots made him a pure liability in the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -44.1
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Offense -6.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense +2.5
Raw total -4.3
Avg player in 20.2m -9.7
Impact -14.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
11
pts
16
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.1

Utter dominance in the paint fueled a monstrous +18.1 overall impact. Elite rim protection combined with near-perfect interior finishing created a massive advantage during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Offense +19.0
Hustle +1.4
Defense +6.9
Raw total +27.3
Avg player in 19.3m -9.2
Impact +18.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Hovered around neutral during a short rotational burst. Managed to find the bottom of the net from deep but didn't log enough defensive counting stats to move the needle.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Offense +2.4
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.9
Raw total +3.3
Avg player in 7.5m -3.6
Impact -0.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.2

A brief, uneventful cameo yielded a slightly negative score. One missed attempt defined a stint too short to generate meaningful two-way metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +31.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Offense -0.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.6
Raw total +1.0
Avg player in 4.7m -2.2
Impact -1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.8

Maximized a brief garbage-time stint with aggressive offensive execution. A pair of quick conversions bumped his box score metrics into the green before the final buzzer.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 60.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +4.1
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +4.1
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Burned a few minutes of clock without registering any counting stats. Maintained a neutral rating by simply avoiding mistakes in late-game action.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +0.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.9
Raw total +1.2
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Logged empty minutes at the end of the rotation. A slight defensive lapse pushed his negligible impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +0.7
Defense -0.5
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 2.7m -1.3
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Barely saw the floor in a fleeting appearance. Logged zero measurable stats, resulting in a virtually neutral impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0