Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
CLE lead NYK lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NYK 2P — 3P —
CLE 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 173 attempts

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson Hard 6/19 -3.5
Bridges 6/17 -4.6
Hart Hard 4/11 -2.2
Anunoby 2/9 -5.9
Robinson Open 5/6 +2.1
Towns Open 5/5 +4.9
Alvarado Hard 2/5 -0.3
Diawara Hard 2/5 -0.6
Shamet Hard 1/5 -2.5
Kolek Hard 2/3 +1.5

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Harden Hard 8/18 +3.0
Mitchell 5/18 -8.1
Tyson 5/10 -0.1
Wade 4/9 +0.5
Allen Open 7/8 +4.1
Mobley 4/7 +1.1
Schröder Hard 1/6 -2.8
Merrill Hard 0/4 -3.8
Ellis 2/3 +0.8
Bryant Hard 1/2 +0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NYK
CLE
35/86 Field Goals 37/87
40.7% Field Goal % 42.5%
10/37 3-Pointers 13/35
27.0% 3-Point % 37.1%
14/21 Free Throws 22/30
66.7% Free Throw % 73.3%
49.3% True Shooting % 54.4%
58 Total Rebounds 58
11 Offensive 13
33 Defensive 31
23 Assists 23
1.35 Assist/TO Ratio 2.09
16 Turnovers 11
7 Steals 11
8 Blocks 6
22 Fouls 18
46 Points in Paint 42
9 Fast Break Pts 8
10 Points off TOs 17
15 Second Chance Pts 16
27 Bench Points 24
2 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jarrett Allen
19 PTS · 10 REB · 1 AST · 28.8 MIN
+24.22
2
Dean Wade
11 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 24.7 MIN
+20.89
3
Mitchell Robinson
11 PTS · 16 REB · 1 AST · 19.3 MIN
+20.53
4
Mikal Bridges
18 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 31.7 MIN
+14.42
5
Donovan Mitchell
23 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 31.4 MIN
+13.07
6
Evan Mobley
12 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 24.5 MIN
+10.99
7
Jaylon Tyson
12 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 26.9 MIN
+10.42
8
Karl-Anthony Towns
14 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 29.1 MIN
+9.91
9
James Harden
20 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 32.2 MIN
+7.35
10
Jose Alvarado
5 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 21.9 MIN
+4.83
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:08 T. Kolek cutting Layup (4 PTS) (D. Jones 1 AST) 94–109
Q4 0:15 J. Sochan REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 92–109
Q4 0:18 MISS N. Tomlin alley-oop DUNK 92–109
Q4 0:27 C. Porter Jr. REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 92–109
Q4 0:31 MISS D. Brown 17' pullup Shot 92–109
Q4 0:45 M. Diawara driving Layup (5 PTS) (T. Kolek 2 AST) 92–109
Q4 1:05 T. Bryant Free Throw 2 of 2 (5 PTS) 90–109
Q4 1:05 T. Bryant Free Throw 1 of 2 (4 PTS) 90–108
Q4 1:05 D. Jones shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Bryant 2 FT) 90–107
Q4 1:18 D. Brown REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 90–107
Q4 1:21 MISS T. Kolek 32' pullup 3PT 90–107
Q4 1:30 D. Jones REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 90–107
Q4 1:32 MISS T. Bryant 25' 3PT 90–107
Q4 1:47 M. Diawara 3PT (3 PTS) (T. Kolek 1 AST) 90–107
Q4 2:10 T. Bryant 24' 3PT (3 PTS) (T. Proctor 1 AST) 87–107

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 32.2m
20
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.8

Defensive apathy (-1.2) and likely givebacks in transition tanked a seemingly productive scoring night. The offensive volume simply couldn't cover up the defensive bleeding during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 26.6%
Net Rtg +13.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
23
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+12.8

Brutal offensive inefficiency was surprisingly bailed out by elite defensive engagement (+8.0). Despite clanking away from deep, his effort on the other end of the floor kept his overall impact above water.

Shooting
FG 5/18 (27.8%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 11/14 (78.6%)
Advanced
TS% 47.6%
USG% 35.5%
Net Rtg +34.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +3.5
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense +5.5
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jarrett Allen 28.8m
19
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+27.6

An absolute masterclass in interior control drove a staggering +21.7 impact score. Near-perfect finishing at the rim and relentless hustle (+6.2) completely overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 85.7%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +18.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +10.8
Defense +2.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Dean Wade 24.7m
11
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+19.1

Perimeter marksmanship and suffocating defense (+12.0) combined for a spectacular two-way showing. Spacing the floor effectively allowed him to punish defensive rotations while locking down his own assignments.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg +40.1
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +10.2
Defense +5.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 0
S Evan Mobley 24.5m
12
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+11.5

Steady, efficient finishing in the paint anchored a solid positive rating. His reliable defensive rotations (+3.6) ensured his minutes remained a net positive for the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.2%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg +9.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaylon Tyson 26.9m
12
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.8

Balanced two-way play kept his impact comfortably in the green. Efficient shot selection and active defensive rotations (+5.2) proved highly effective during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.5%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg +21.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +4.3
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.0

Excellent point-of-attack defense (+5.8) was entirely wasted by a dreadful shooting performance. Forcing bad looks on offense dragged his overall impact into the negative despite his defensive tenacity.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +21.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 10.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Sam Merrill 21.0m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.8

Missing every single look from beyond the arc resulted in a catastrophic -14.1 rating. Without his perimeter shot falling, he offered virtually nothing else to justify his floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +31.7
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring -3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Keon Ellis 15.8m
4
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

Efficient finishing couldn't prevent a slight negative rating during his rotational minutes. The defensive metrics were solid, but overall lineup struggles likely dragged down his total impact.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -28.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Logged virtually empty minutes at the end of the game. A missed attempt and slight defensive minus pushed his score slightly below neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.1

Burned off the final minutes of the clock without making an offensive dent. A completely empty stint resulted in a negligible negative score.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.1

Managed a slightly positive rating in a brief late-game appearance. Avoided negative plays while providing a tiny boost in hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

A single missed shot defined a very brief rotational cameo. Failed to register any positive hustle or defensive metrics to offset the offensive blank.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.9

Instantly capitalized on garbage-time minutes with aggressive shooting. A quick perimeter conversion spiked his box score metrics in a microscopic sample size.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 36.0m
20
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.8

High-volume chucking and defensive liabilities (-0.4) severely punished the team while he was on the floor. The sheer number of empty possessions from missed jumpers drove his overall impact into double-digit negatives.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 45.3%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -26.5
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 61.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S OG Anunoby 34.3m
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.0

A severe offensive drop-off cratered his value in this matchup. While his point-of-attack defense remained stout, an inability to convert open looks created a massive negative swing during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 31.7m
18
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.2

Elite two-way activity masked a highly inefficient shooting performance. He kept his impact firmly in the green by generating extra possessions through relentless hustle (+4.2) and suffocating perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg -15.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense +3.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
14
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.7

Flawless shot execution anchored a highly efficient, albeit lower-volume, offensive night. His defensive positioning (+7.7) proved just as vital to the positive impact as his perfect finishing around the rim.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 103.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -9.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +6.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 5
S Josh Hart 26.2m
10
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-5.4

Strong defensive metrics (+4.8) were completely undone by poor perimeter shot selection. Clanking away from deep dragged his overall impact into the red despite a solid foundation of active hustle plays.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.5%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
5
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.9

Pesky on-ball pressure (+3.6 defense) couldn't salvage a negative overall rating. Poor offensive execution and missed perimeter looks ultimately outweighed his defensive disruptions.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -2.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.4

Total inability to connect from the perimeter resulted in a disastrous -14.0 impact score. Offering zero hustle stats to offset the missed shots made him a pure liability in the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -44.1
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
11
pts
16
reb
1
ast
Impact
+20.5

Utter dominance in the paint fueled a monstrous +18.1 overall impact. Elite rim protection combined with near-perfect interior finishing created a massive advantage during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +8.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +16.4
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.2

Hovered around neutral during a short rotational burst. Managed to find the bottom of the net from deep but didn't log enough defensive counting stats to move the needle.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

A brief, uneventful cameo yielded a slightly negative score. One missed attempt defined a stint too short to generate meaningful two-way metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +31.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.0

Logged empty minutes at the end of the rotation. A slight defensive lapse pushed his negligible impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

Burned a few minutes of clock without registering any counting stats. Maintained a neutral rating by simply avoiding mistakes in late-game action.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +3.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -1.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.2

Maximized a brief garbage-time stint with aggressive offensive execution. A pair of quick conversions bumped his box score metrics into the green before the final buzzer.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 60.0%
Net Rtg +80.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.5

Barely saw the floor in a fleeting appearance. Logged zero measurable stats, resulting in a virtually neutral impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +1.7
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0