Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NYK lead CLE lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
CLE 2P — 3P —
NYK 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 165 attempts

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell 8/18 -0.4
Harden 6/15 -0.8
Allen Open 5/10 -2.4
Mobley 5/8 +2.9
Merrill Hard 1/8 -7.0
Strus 1/7 -5.6
Schröder 2/5 -1.0
Tyson 1/4 -2.8
Wade Hard 1/3 -0.3
Tomlin Open 1/1 +0.6

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Hart 10/21 +1.3
Brunson 7/16 -1.4
Bridges 9/12 +5.9
Towns 7/12 +2.3
McBride Hard 2/9 -4.2
Anunoby 5/8 +2.6
Clarkson Open 2/2 +1.8
Robinson Open 2/2 +1.2
Shamet Hard 0/1 -0.9
Dadiet Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CLE
NYK
31/80 Field Goals 44/85
38.8% Field Goal % 51.8%
9/35 3-Pointers 13/36
25.7% 3-Point % 36.1%
22/32 Free Throws 8/14
68.8% Free Throw % 57.1%
49.4% True Shooting % 59.8%
53 Total Rebounds 54
13 Offensive 5
29 Defensive 35
15 Assists 32
1.88 Assist/TO Ratio 4.00
8 Turnovers 6
4 Steals 5
5 Blocks 5
20 Fouls 22
40 Points in Paint 58
8 Fast Break Pts 13
11 Points off TOs 13
17 Second Chance Pts 12
19 Bench Points 13
6 Largest Lead 19
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Mikal Bridges
19 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 39.8 MIN
+20.6
2
Josh Hart
26 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 33.3 MIN
+20.4
3
Jarrett Allen
13 PTS · 10 REB · 0 AST · 28.9 MIN
+17.25
4
OG Anunoby
14 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 31.9 MIN
+16.92
5
James Harden
18 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 31.9 MIN
+16.48
6
Karl-Anthony Towns
18 PTS · 13 REB · 1 AST · 35.8 MIN
+15.05
7
Evan Mobley
14 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 36.5 MIN
+14.64
8
Donovan Mitchell
26 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 38.6 MIN
+13.61
9
Jalen Brunson
19 PTS · 3 REB · 14 AST · 40.1 MIN
+12.7
10
Nae'Qwan Tomlin
2 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 1.2 MIN
+3.26
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:20 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 93–109
Q4 0:42 N. Tomlin tip Layup (2 PTS) 93–109
Q4 0:42 N. Tomlin REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 91–109
Q4 0:45 MISS T. Bryant 13' Jump Shot 91–109
Q4 0:56 T. Bryant REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 91–109
Q4 0:58 MISS P. Dadiet 26' 3PT 91–109
Q4 1:15 M. Strus offensive foul TURNOVER (3 TO) 91–109
Q4 1:15 M. Strus offensive FOUL (6 PF) 91–109
Q4 1:21 J. Brunson 6' driving floating Jump Shot (19 PTS) 91–109
Q4 1:36 L. Shamet REBOUND (Off:0 Def:4) 91–107
Q4 1:37 MISS D. Mitchell 25' step back 3PT 91–107
Q4 1:43 M. Bridges 11' turnaround Jump Shot (19 PTS) (J. Brunson 14 AST) 91–107
Q4 1:57 D. Mitchell kicked ball VIOLATION 91–105
Q4 2:15 J. Harden Free Throw 1 of 1 (18 PTS) 91–105
Q4 2:15 K. Towns shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Harden 1 FT) 90–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 40.1m
19
pts
3
reb
14
ast
Impact
+4.3

A masterful shift from scorer to primary facilitator defined his performance, as he dished out 14 assists—more than double his season average of 6.5. This elite creation drove his offensive value, compensating for a below-average scoring night and 1-of-7 shooting from deep.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.5%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg +24.0
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.1m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 45.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 39.8m
19
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+15.8

Supreme offensive efficiency was the story of his game, as he scored 19 points on a remarkable 9-of-12 from the field. This highly effective scoring drove his +18.4 offensive value and was achieved with zero turnovers in nearly 40 minutes of play.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 79.2%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +29.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.8m
Scoring +16.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
18
pts
13
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.5

Efficient two-way play defined his night, as he scored 18 points on 7-of-12 shooting while controlling the glass with 13 rebounds. He anchored the defense by holding opponents to 38% shooting and protected the ball perfectly, committing zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +28.4
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.8m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +3.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 38.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Josh Hart 33.3m
26
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+21.1

A massive scoring outburst drove his performance, as he erupted for 26 points—more than double his season average—on 5-of-11 shooting from three. This offensive explosion (+20.5) was paired with suffocating defense, holding his matchups to just 2-of-11 from the field.

Shooting
FG 10/21 (47.6%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.4%
USG% 31.9%
Net Rtg +27.4
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +4.1
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S OG Anunoby 31.9m
14
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.0

A dominant defensive performance anchored Anunoby's night, as he recorded 3 blocks and held his matchups to just 3-of-9 shooting. This defensive prowess (+6.8) was complemented by highly efficient scoring (5-of-8 FG) and zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +35.5
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

An offensive disappearing act defined his 15 minutes on the court, as he failed to score a single point on just one shot attempt. While he contributed 4 rebounds, his primary role as a floor-spacer went completely unfulfilled.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.9%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.5

Despite a poor shooting night (2-of-9 FG), he found ways to contribute by grabbing 4 rebounds and dishing 3 assists, both well above his averages. His value came from this supplementary playmaking rather than his usual perimeter scoring.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.4

In limited minutes, his impact was primarily felt on the defensive end, where he generated a +2.0 value and recorded a block. His offensive contribution was marred by going 0-for-4 from the free-throw line.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/4 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.4m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.8

His value came entirely from his trademark defensive tenacity in just under eight minutes of play. While he didn't score, he completely locked down his assignments, holding them to 0-for-5 shooting and generating a +2.5 defensive value.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.7

He provided an efficient scoring spark in a brief seven-minute stint, making both of his field goal attempts. This quick offensive burst (+2.0) was his sole contribution before heading back to the bench.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

He played only 75 seconds in garbage time and did not record any stats, offering no opportunity to impact the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

In 75 seconds of garbage-time action, his only statistical contribution was a single missed three-point attempt.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
26
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+14.3

This was a pure scoring performance, with his value almost entirely derived from his +17.9 offensive contribution. Mitchell shouldered the scoring load with 26 points but largely abandoned his playmaking role, finishing with just 1 assist against his 3.1 average.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg -11.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +18.1
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Evan Mobley 36.5m
14
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.7

Mobley’s value was rooted in hyper-efficiency, as he shot 5-of-8 from the field and 2-of-3 from deep. This efficient scoring drove a strong offensive contribution (+13.1), even as his raw point and rebound totals dipped below his season averages.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +11.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S James Harden 31.9m
18
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.1

A dramatic shift in ball security defined this performance, as Harden committed zero turnovers compared to his season average of 4.3. This mistake-free play fueled his positive offensive value (+13.6), even as his playmaking plummeted to just 2 assists and opponents shot 69% when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg -33.9
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jarrett Allen 28.9m
13
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+17.6

A dominant interior performance drove Allen's night, pairing 13 points with 10 rebounds (↑ vs 6.9 avg) for a strong double-double. His value was anchored by a massive offensive contribution (+14.0) and mistake-free play, as he did not commit a single turnover.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.4%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -32.2
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +12.7
Defense +3.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Dean Wade 20.7m
3
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.2

A quiet night was defined by minimal offensive involvement, as he took only three shots and scored just 3 points. While he held his defensive matchups to 3-of-8 shooting, his 2 turnovers on low usage and lack of scoring punch limited his overall contribution.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -22.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.7m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Max Strus 25.5m
5
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.1

Inefficiency on both ends of the floor plagued this outing, as Strus shot just 1-of-7 from the field and committed 3 turnovers. His struggles were compounded on defense, where he fouled out with 6 personal fouls and opponents shot 7-of-10 when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.7%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -36.8
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
Sam Merrill 23.2m
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.5

A brutal shooting night defined his performance, as he went 0-for-7 from three-point range and 1-of-8 overall from the field. This lack of shot-making was the primary driver of his negative offensive value (-5.2), nullifying his role as a floor spacer.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/7 (0.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 20.5%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring -2.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.9
Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaylon Tyson 10.5m
4
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.6

In just over 10 minutes of action, Tyson's performance was largely defined by a cold shooting touch from deep, missing all three of his attempts. He failed to record any hustle stats or assists, limiting his ability to make a positive impact.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

He played only 75 seconds of garbage time and recorded no statistics, having no opportunity to influence the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

He saw just 75 seconds of action at the end of the game and did not record any stats, preventing any meaningful impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Keon Ellis 1.2m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

His 75 seconds on the floor came in garbage time, where he had no opportunity to record any statistics or affect the outcome.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.1

In just 75 seconds of play, his only recorded statistic was a missed field goal attempt, offering no real chance to contribute.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

His contribution was limited to a single made field goal in 75 seconds of garbage-time action.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0