Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NOP lead CLE lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
CLE 2P — 3P —
NOP 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell 9/23 -5.7
Harden Hard 8/17 +1.9
Mobley Open 8/10 +4.0
Merrill Hard 5/9 +2.7
Bryant Open 5/7 +1.8
Wade 3/6 -0.3
Ellis 2/6 -3.4
Strus Hard 2/5 -0.4
Schröder 0/4 -5.0
Tomlin Open 0/1 -1.4

NOP NOP Shot-making Δ

Bey Hard 6/14 +1.6
Williamson Open 10/14 +0.9
Murray 4/13 -5.0
Jones Hard 4/12 -0.6
Fears 3/11 -5.2
Murphy III Hard 3/10 -1.8
Missi Open 3/7 -3.3
Queen 3/5 +0.6
Matković Open 3/4 +0.7
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CLE
NOP
42/88 Field Goals 39/90
47.7% Field Goal % 43.3%
12/39 3-Pointers 12/40
30.8% 3-Point % 30.0%
15/22 Free Throws 16/20
68.2% Free Throw % 80.0%
56.8% True Shooting % 53.6%
63 Total Rebounds 45
14 Offensive 10
41 Defensive 30
26 Assists 30
1.86 Assist/TO Ratio 3.33
13 Turnovers 9
6 Steals 10
4 Blocks 7
17 Fouls 19
60 Points in Paint 54
10 Fast Break Pts 14
14 Points off TOs 21
11 Second Chance Pts 14
24 Bench Points 28
13 Largest Lead 15
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Zion Williamson
25 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 32.3 MIN
+20.73
2
Donovan Mitchell
27 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 39.0 MIN
+18.74
3
Evan Mobley
18 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 30.4 MIN
+18.08
4
James Harden
20 PTS · 6 REB · 10 AST · 36.3 MIN
+17.09
5
Sam Merrill
15 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST · 32.1 MIN
+13.02
6
Saddiq Bey
19 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 36.4 MIN
+12.85
7
Yves Missi
6 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 24.2 MIN
+12.77
8
Derik Queen
9 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 15.2 MIN
+12.49
9
Dean Wade
7 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 23.3 MIN
+11.21
10
Thomas Bryant
11 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 14.7 MIN
+10.62
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:02 S. Merrill REBOUND (Off:1 Def:9) 111–106
Q4 0:02 MISS T. Murphy III 26' pullup 3PT 111–106
Q4 0:04 D. Mitchell Free Throw 1 of 1 (27 PTS) 111–106
Q4 0:04 T. Murphy III shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Mitchell 1 FT) 110–106
Q4 0:04 D. Mitchell driving Layup (26 PTS) (J. Harden 10 AST) 110–106
Q4 0:26 D. Murray running Layup (12 PTS) 108–106
Q4 0:31 S. Bey REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 108–104
Q4 0:34 MISS D. Mitchell 18' pullup Shot 108–104
Q4 0:45 M. Strus REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 108–104
Q4 0:49 MISS J. Harden 12' step back Shot 108–104
Q4 1:11 E. Mobley REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 108–104
Q4 1:13 MISS Z. Williamson Free Throw 1 of 1 108–104
Q4 1:13 E. Mobley shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Williamson 1 FT) 108–104
Q4 1:13 Z. Williamson driving Layup (25 PTS) (D. Murray 9 AST) 108–104
Q4 1:24 S. Merrill cutting Layup (15 PTS) (E. Mobley 3 AST) 108–102

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Trey Murphy III 40.5m
10
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.8

A brutal shooting night from deep severely limited his offensive utility, as he repeatedly bricked wide-open catch-and-shoot opportunities. Despite providing excellent weak-side rim protection, the sheer volume of empty offensive possessions dragged his net impact deep into the red. Opponents capitalized on his long misses to ignite their transition game, establishing a pattern that turned his offensive struggles into a massive team-wide liability.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +6.7
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
S Saddiq Bey 36.4m
19
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+10.6

Sunk his overall impact through a series of ill-advised, contested mid-range pull-ups early in the shot clock. While the outside stroke was falling, his defensive lapses on the perimeter allowed uncontested blow-bys that compromised the rim protection. The raw scoring output was entirely offset by a specific pattern of dying on screens, which forced the defense into constant rotation.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.0%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +12.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Zion Williamson 32.3m
25
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+15.8

An unstoppable force going downhill, completely overwhelming the primary point-of-attack defenders with sheer velocity and power. His gravity in the paint warped the opposing scheme, forcing early rotations that he expertly punished with quick kick-outs. A dominant third-quarter stretch of bullying his way to the rim dictated the terms of engagement for the entire half.

Shooting
FG 10/14 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/9 (55.6%)
Advanced
TS% 69.6%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.3m
Scoring +19.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +4.7
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Herbert Jones 31.3m
12
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.6

Offensive inefficiency plagued his shift, with a heavy reliance on contested perimeter jumpers that failed to drop. While his point-of-attack defense remained disruptive, the inability to finish through contact on cuts negated his overall value. The defense happily lived with his high-volume outside shooting, which short-circuited several crucial possessions and defined a pattern of negative impact.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -11.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Dejounte Murray 30.0m
12
pts
3
reb
9
ast
Impact
-2.9

Playmaking brilliance was completely overshadowed by a disastrous shot selection featuring highly contested, off-balance floaters. His struggles to create separation against drop coverage led to stalled possessions and forced late-clock heaves. The resulting long rebounds fueled the opponent's transition attack, establishing a pattern of bleeding points the other way and erasing the value of his setup work.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.9%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg -1.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Yves Missi 24.2m
6
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.9

Changed the geometry of the court with relentless rim-running and elite vertical spacing. His defensive impact was profound, violently altering shots at the summit and securing tough traffic rebounds to close out possessions. A masterclass in knowing his role, defined by a series of explosive pick-and-roll dives that completely collapsed the opposing defense.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +6.1
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +11.7
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 1
7
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.3

Suffered a massive drop-off from his recent scoring tear, forcing the issue against set defenses instead of letting the game come to him. His tunnel vision on drives resulted in wild, blockable attempts at the rim that triggered immediate fast breaks for the opposition. The lack of secondary playmaking left the offense completely stagnant during his minutes, highlighted by a stretch of forced isolation plays that went nowhere.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.8%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -7.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Derik Queen 15.2m
9
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.3

Operated as a brilliant offensive hub from the high post, picking apart the zone with pinpoint interior passing. His active hands and elite positioning on defense blew up multiple dribble hand-offs, turning stops into instant offense. A highly efficient, connective performance defined by his ability to consistently read the back-line defense and hit cutters in stride.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.2%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg -6.5
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +5.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.6

Continued his streak of hyper-efficient finishing, feasting on dump-offs and offensive putbacks around the basket. His sturdy screen-setting freed up the guards, while his disciplined drop coverage completely sealed off the paint. Maximized a short stint by making zero mistakes and executing the scheme perfectly, defined by his textbook verticality on defense against driving guards.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -42.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
27
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.1

A massive shot diet yielded diminishing returns, as forced isolation attempts against set defenses dragged down his overall efficiency. While his aggressive downhill pressure bent the defense, the resulting missed contested layups triggered opponent run-outs. Still managed to stay above water thanks to a late-game pattern of timely defensive gambles that generated extra possessions.

Shooting
FG 9/23 (39.1%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 51.8%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg -1.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.0m
Scoring +15.5
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +4.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S James Harden 36.3m
20
pts
6
reb
10
ast
Impact
+10.1

Masterfully manipulated the pick-and-roll, using his deceleration to freeze drop-coverage bigs and create high-value looks. His defensive rating spiked thanks to active post-up resistance and stripping driving guards in the gap. The defining element of his night was his elite pocket passing, which consistently punished the defense for trapping out high.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.8%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.3m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Sam Merrill 32.1m
15
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.4

Despite decent individual metrics, his overall impact slipped into the red due to empty possessions from deep. He struggled to generate secondary actions when run off the three-point line, stalling the half-court flow. A specific pattern of slow defensive rotations on the weak side bled value and allowed the opponent to build momentum during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +6.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +5.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Evan Mobley 30.4m
18
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.8

Dominated the interior with ruthless efficiency, continuing a dominant streak of high-percentage finishing around the rim. His elite rim protection and active hands in the passing lanes fueled transition opportunities. Completely neutralized his frontcourt matchup through sheer length and anticipation, controlling the paint on both ends.

Shooting
FG 8/10 (80.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/5 (40.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.8%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +7.2
Defense -1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Dean Wade 23.3m
7
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.7

Anchored the frontcourt with disciplined, switchable defense that disrupted opposing pick-and-rolls. His willingness to take open perimeter looks kept the floor spaced, allowing the primary creators room to operate. A crucial stretch of weak-side rim deterrence in the second quarter defined his highly effective glue-guy shift.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +23.9
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +5.4
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Max Strus 24.2m
5
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

A sharp regression from his recent hot streak, characterized by an inability to shake loose from top-locking defenders. The lack of off-ball gravity allowed the defense to heavily stunt at the nail, bogging down the entire offensive rhythm. Without his typical floor-spacing threat to bend the defense, his overall utility plummeted during a stagnant second-half stretch.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -9.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +9.2
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Keon Ellis 22.7m
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.5

High-energy hustle plays couldn't mask the offensive dead weight created by his perimeter hesitance and missed open looks. Opposing defenses actively ignored him on the weak side, severely cramping the floor for the primary ball-handlers. A recurring failure to navigate off-ball screens allowed his matchup to find easy catch-and-shoot rhythm, sinking his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.1%
USG% 15.1%
Net Rtg +28.9
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Provided a massive physical presence off the bench, punishing smaller defenders with deep post seals and decisive finishes. His verticality at the rim deterred several drives, anchoring a highly successful defensive stretch for the second unit. Maximized his limited minutes by converting almost every touch into a high-value outcome, specifically dominating the offensive glass during a key third-quarter run.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.8%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg -12.1
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.7m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.3
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
1
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-18.6

An absolute crater of a performance driven by forced, out-of-rhythm drives into heavy traffic. His inability to finish or draw fouls at the rim resulted in empty possessions that fed directly into opponent fast breaks. The offense completely stalled during his minutes as the ball stuck on the perimeter, defined by a disastrous second-quarter stint where he derailed the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 10.2%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -6.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.4m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.5

Struggled to find the pace of the game during a brief, disjointed stint on the floor. A rushed offensive attempt and late defensive rotations highlighted a lack of situational awareness. Was quickly pulled after failing to establish any physical presence in the paint against a heavier frontcourt matchup.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +4.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0