Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAC lead GSW lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
GSW 2P — 3P —
SAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 172 attempts

GSW GSW Shot-making Δ

Kuminga 8/19 -2.0
Moody Hard 9/15 +9.6
Richard 10/15 +8.5
Podziemski Hard 5/10 +2.0
Horford Hard 0/8 -7.7
Spencer Open 3/7 -1.8
Hield 3/5 +1.1
Post Hard 0/5 -4.7
Jackson-Davis 1/2 0.0
Santos 0/2 -2.3

SAC SAC Shot-making Δ

DeRozan 8/20 -2.6
Schröder Hard 6/17 -1.4
Westbrook 9/13 +6.8
Monk Hard 6/12 +2.2
Clifford Hard 4/8 +2.6
Eubanks 5/6 +3.5
Raynaud 1/3 -1.5
Achiuwa Open 2/2 +1.4
Ellis Hard 0/1 -0.8
Carter Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
GSW
SAC
40/89 Field Goals 41/83
44.9% Field Goal % 49.4%
17/43 3-Pointers 11/23
39.5% 3-Point % 47.8%
19/23 Free Throws 28/33
82.6% Free Throw % 84.8%
58.5% True Shooting % 62.0%
49 Total Rebounds 51
10 Offensive 8
34 Defensive 39
28 Assists 27
1.47 Assist/TO Ratio 1.69
18 Turnovers 16
10 Steals 7
6 Blocks 5
26 Fouls 18
40 Points in Paint 54
20 Fast Break Pts 17
11 Points off TOs 30
20 Second Chance Pts 11
20 Bench Points 31
13 Largest Lead 11
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Will Richard
30 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 34.5 MIN
+30.33
2
Russell Westbrook
23 PTS · 16 REB · 10 AST · 35.4 MIN
+29.13
3
Moses Moody
28 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 38.5 MIN
+26.31
4
DeMar DeRozan
25 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 35.7 MIN
+16.7
5
Malik Monk
21 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 25.3 MIN
+12.79
6
Nique Clifford
12 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 32.9 MIN
+8.84
7
Brandin Podziemski
14 PTS · 9 REB · 9 AST · 31.0 MIN
+8.01
8
Drew Eubanks
12 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 32.2 MIN
+7.98
9
Maxime Raynaud
6 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 15.1 MIN
+6.71
10
Buddy Hield
9 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 13.8 MIN
+6.65
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 W. Richard Layup (30 PTS) 116–121
Q4 0:01 W. Richard REBOUND (Off:5 Def:2) 114–121
Q4 0:03 MISS J. Kuminga 20' fadeaway Shot 114–121
Q4 0:07 D. DeRozan Free Throw 2 of 2 (25 PTS) 114–121
Q4 0:07 D. DeRozan Free Throw 1 of 2 (24 PTS) 114–120
Q4 0:07 M. Moody take personal FOUL (3 PF) (DeRozan 2 FT) 114–119
Q4 0:08 B. Podziemski lost ball out-of-bounds TURNOVER (4 TO) 114–119
Q4 0:12 K. Ellis take personal FOUL (4 PF) 114–119
Q4 0:14 D. Schröder Free Throw 2 of 2 (18 PTS) 114–119
Q4 0:14 D. Schröder Free Throw 1 of 2 (17 PTS) 114–118
Q4 0:14 W. Richard take personal FOUL (3 PF) (Schröder 2 FT) 114–117
Q4 0:17 M. Moody personal FOUL (2 PF) 114–117
Q4 0:17 D. Eubanks REBOUND (Off:1 Def:5) 114–117
Q4 0:24 MISS J. Kuminga 10' turnaround Shot 114–117
Q4 0:32 A. Horford REBOUND (Off:1 Def:6) 114–117

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAC Sacramento Kings
S DeMar DeRozan 35.7m
25
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.3

High-volume inefficiency dragged his Total Impact down to a flat -0.1 despite a strong Box score. Missing 12 shots from the field represented a cascade of empty possessions that offset his scoring output. He settled for heavily contested midrange looks that failed to convert at his usual rate.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.2%
USG% 29.1%
Net Rtg -1.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +17.1
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
23
pts
16
reb
10
ast
Impact
+22.9

An absolute masterclass in efficiency and defensive rebounding fueled a gargantuan +17.5 Total Impact. He ruthlessly punished defensive gaps, converting at an incredibly high clip while anchoring the defense (+8.2 Def). This was a massive, highly-disciplined spike over his recent baseline.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.9%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +2.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +20.4
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +10.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Nique Clifford 32.9m
12
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.2

While he shot well from beyond the arc, his overall impact cratered to -5.0 due to off-ball defensive lapses and poor transition spacing. The solid box metrics (+7.1) were entirely erased by the points surrendered while he was on the floor. He knocked down his open looks but gave it all back on the margins.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +4.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
18
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
-4.0

Forcing the issue on drives led to 11 missed shots, driving his Total Impact into the red (-5.5). He stalled the offense with empty possessions despite a massive spike in overall scoring volume. While the raw production looked better than his recent slump, the inefficiency was highly damaging.

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.0%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +5.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.3m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +2.1
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Drew Eubanks 32.2m
12
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.1

Elite defensive metrics (+7.8 Def) and near-perfect finishing were bizarrely undermined by negative lineup combinations, resulting in a -1.1 Total Impact. He played his role perfectly as a rim-runner and interior deterrent. The negative overall score reflects rotational struggles rather than individual execution.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +7.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
Malik Monk 25.3m
21
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.4

A potent scoring punch off the bench generated a strong +13.4 Box score, but defensive apathy (-0.0 Def) nearly washed out his entire impact. He traded baskets effectively but offered zero resistance on the other end. The result was a neutral +0.3 Total Impact despite the offensive fireworks.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 67.7%
USG% 27.7%
Net Rtg +1.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Scoring +16.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Keon Ellis 17.1m
0
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.5

Complete offensive invisibility caused his Total Impact to slip to -1.6, a stark drop from his recent double-digit scoring average. However, he salvaged his floor time with phenomenal hustle metrics (+6.8) and point-of-attack defense. He was a pure energy specialist who refused to shoot.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.4%
Net Rtg +9.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.8

Seeing a sharp decline in offensive touches didn't prevent him from posting a solid +4.0 Total Impact. He pivoted beautifully to a defensive anchor role, logging an impressive +5.8 Def metric to protect the paint. His ability to impact winning without his usual scoring volume showcased excellent versatility.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
4
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Perfect finishing on limited touches and solid interior defense (+2.8 Def) kept him in the green (+1.4) despite a drastically reduced role. He didn't force the issue when the offense went away from him. It was a highly efficient, mistake-free shift that stabilized the frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +19.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.3m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.5

Barely seeing the floor, his inability to generate any offense in a brief stint led to a negative impact (-2.1). He failed to register a single hustle play, looking completely out of sync with the rotation. It was a non-factor performance compared to his recent double-digit scoring run.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +9.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
GSW Golden State Warriors
S Moses Moody 38.5m
28
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+24.1

Two-way dominance defined this outing, pairing lethal perimeter sniping with lockdown defensive metrics (+9.9 Def). He capitalized on open catch-and-shoot opportunities to drastically improve his efficiency from recent games. The combination of high-volume shot-making and defensive disruption resulted in a massive +11.3 Total Impact.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 6/11 (54.5%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.5%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg +4.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.5m
Scoring +23.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +7.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 3
24
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.9

Despite a hefty scoring bump above his recent average, severe inefficiency on high volume cratered his overall impact (-7.5). Missing 11 shots from the floor negated the value of his increased aggression. Solid hustle metrics couldn't salvage a performance defined by forced offensive reps.

Shooting
FG 8/19 (42.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.3%
USG% 32.6%
Net Rtg +4.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +14.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +5.6
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -9.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Will Richard 34.5m
30
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+26.1

A massive offensive explosion fueled his sky-high +14.7 Total Impact score. Elite perimeter shot selection and hyper-efficient conversion generated a staggering +30.2 Box metric. He completely shattered his recent scoring baseline to carry the offensive load in a breakout performance.

Shooting
FG 10/15 (66.7%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 83.0%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg +1.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +25.4
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +6.4
Hustle +7.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
14
pts
9
reb
9
ast
Impact
+0.8

Dropping well below his usual scoring volume limited his offensive ceiling, leading to a negative Total Impact (-2.9). While his hustle metrics were stellar (+4.1), the lack of his typical offensive punch left a void. He functioned more as a connector than a primary engine in this matchup.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +19.7
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +6.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Quinten Post 15.7m
0
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

A complete offensive goose egg was heavily masked by outstanding defensive metrics (+6.8 Def). Brick-laying from the perimeter tanked his box score, but active rotations and rim deterrence kept his overall impact near neutral. His value came entirely without the basketball.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +11.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.7m
Scoring -3.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
Al Horford 26.5m
0
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.3

Missing every single shot he took severely punished his Total Impact (-8.3) despite phenomenal defensive positioning. His inability to punish defenses from the outside allowed opponents to completely ignore him on the perimeter. Elite hustle and rim protection (+7.2 Def) simply couldn't overcome the offensive zeroes.

Shooting
FG 0/8 (0.0%)
3PT 0/7 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring -6.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +8.9
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Pat Spencer 17.0m
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.9

Subpar finishing inside the arc and negative defensive metrics compounded to drag his Total Impact down to -9.1. He struggled to stay in front of his matchups, bleeding value on the less glamorous end of the floor. A dip from his usual scoring baseline only magnified the defensive shortcomings.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -51.4
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Buddy Hield 13.8m
9
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.0

Breaking out of a severe slump, his efficient shot-making in limited bursts drove a solid +2.6 Total Impact. He maximized his short floor time by capitalizing on defensive breakdowns. The sudden resurgence in accuracy provided a much-needed spark off the bench.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -35.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.4

Severely reduced offensive involvement limited his overall influence, though he remained a net positive (+0.5). He made his lone shot attempt but primarily leaned on his defensive positioning (+2.5 Def) to stay afloat. The lack of typical scoring volume prevented a higher impact score.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 6.9%
Net Rtg -33.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.9

High-energy rim runs and active hands generated a positive impact (+1.5) during a very brief stint. He played strictly within his role, avoiding mistakes while contributing solid hustle metrics. It was a textbook low-usage, high-efficiency cameo.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg -9.5
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.0m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Gui Santos 7.0m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.0

An abrupt halt to his recent hot streak tanked his brief rotation minutes. Failing to convert on limited touches resulted in a stark -4.4 Total Impact. He couldn't find the rhythm that had defined his previous four hyper-efficient outings.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0