Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NYK lead CLE lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
CLE 2P — 3P —
NYK 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

CLE CLE Shot-making Δ

Mitchell 12/23 +1.4
Mobley 6/16 -3.1
Harden Hard 5/16 -4.5
Merrill Hard 4/9 +1.0
Schröder 1/9 -7.7
Strus Hard 2/6 -0.4
Allen Open 3/6 -1.6
Wade Hard 3/5 +3.4

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson 15/29 +1.8
Towns 6/14 -3.9
Bridges 7/11 +3.6
Hart 5/11 -2.4
Anunoby Hard 2/9 -4.8
Shamet Hard 3/4 +4.5
Alvarado 2/3 +0.7
Clarkson 1/3 -0.3
Robinson Open 1/3 -2.2
McBride Hard 0/1 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
CLE
NYK
36/90 Field Goals 42/88
40.0% Field Goal % 47.7%
16/50 3-Pointers 10/32
32.0% 3-Point % 31.2%
16/23 Free Throws 21/32
69.6% Free Throw % 65.6%
51.9% True Shooting % 56.3%
55 Total Rebounds 65
11 Offensive 9
27 Defensive 38
23 Assists 20
1.10 Assist/TO Ratio 1.05
19 Turnovers 17
11 Steals 10
6 Blocks 2
29 Fouls 26
38 Points in Paint 60
12 Fast Break Pts 13
20 Points off TOs 28
14 Second Chance Pts 17
25 Bench Points 20
22 Largest Lead 11
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Donovan Mitchell
29 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 40.7 MIN
+25.9
2
Jalen Brunson
38 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 46.4 MIN
+25.37
3
Mikal Bridges
18 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 42.3 MIN
+13.18
4
Dean Wade
10 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 29.3 MIN
+13.18
5
Jarrett Allen
10 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 35.4 MIN
+12.03
6
Landry Shamet
9 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 17.4 MIN
+8.52
7
Josh Hart
13 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST · 30.5 MIN
+8.19
8
Evan Mobley
15 PTS · 14 REB · 3 AST · 40.1 MIN
+7.63
9
Sam Merrill
12 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 28.3 MIN
+7.48
10
Mitchell Robinson
4 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 14.1 MIN
+6.44
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:00 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 104–115
Q5 0:23 J. Brunson REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 104–115
Q5 0:26 MISS E. Mobley 26' pullup 3PT 104–115
Q5 0:29 O. Anunoby Free Throw 2 of 2 (13 PTS) 104–115
Q5 0:29 O. Anunoby Free Throw 1 of 2 (12 PTS) 104–114
Q5 0:29 D. Mitchell personal FOUL (5 PF) (Anunoby 2 FT) 104–113
Q5 0:30 TEAM defensive REBOUND 104–113
Q5 0:32 MISS D. Mitchell 32' pullup 3PT 104–113
Q5 0:34 O. Anunoby personal FOUL (3 PF) 104–113
Q5 0:39 O. Anunoby Free Throw 2 of 2 (11 PTS) 104–113
Q5 0:39 O. Anunoby Free Throw 1 of 2 (10 PTS) 104–112
Q5 0:39 M. Strus personal FOUL (5 PF) (Anunoby 2 FT) 104–111
Q5 0:40 J. Brunson STEAL (3 STL) 104–111
Q5 0:40 J. Harden bad pass TURNOVER (6 TO) 104–111
Q5 0:51 TEAM defensive REBOUND 104–111

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 46.4m
38
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+25.7

A masterful scoring barrage drove Brunson's performance, as he erupted for 38 points on efficient 15/29 shooting to produce a massive +23.7 Offense credit. He relentlessly attacked the paint and added disruptive defense with 3 steals and 4 deflections.

Shooting
FG 15/29 (51.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 7/10 (70.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.9%
USG% 32.7%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 46.4m
Scoring +26.4
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +7.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 42.3m
18
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.2

Hyper-efficient scoring defined Bridges's night, as he poured in 18 points on just 11 shots (64% FG) to generate a +9.8 Offense credit. He was a two-way force, adding 2 steals and holding his defensive matchups to 5/13 shooting.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.8%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.3m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
13
pts
13
reb
5
ast
Impact
-1.4

A disastrous turnover problem undermined an otherwise strong defensive effort from Towns, as his 7 giveaways were more than triple his season average (2.1). While he generated a +8.0 Defense credit and held matchups to 33% shooting, the constant possessions he gave away erased that value.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.4m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +13.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -16.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 7
S OG Anunoby 34.3m
13
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.3

Anunoby manufactured production at the free-throw line (8/10 FT) to salvage an otherwise difficult shooting night where he went just 2-for-9 from the field. His defensive presence remained a positive, holding opponents to 3/9 shooting and earning a +6.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.5%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +23.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Josh Hart 30.5m
13
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.8

Hart's disruptive activity was his calling card, as he tallied 6 deflections that helped fuel a +5.0 Defense credit. He complemented his hustle with solid all-around production, chipping in 13 points, 7 rebounds, and 4 assists.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.7%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -31.3
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +2.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
9
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.0

Hyper-efficient shooting defined Shamet's impactful bench minutes, as he went a perfect 3-for-3 from deep and posted a massive +25 plus-minus. His offensive spark (+8.2 Offense credit) was supplemented by solid hustle plays, including drawing a charge and holding opponents to 0/3 shooting.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 112.5%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +75.7
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.1

McBride was a non-factor offensively, going scoreless on 0/1 shooting in over 16 minutes of play. While he didn't commit any turnovers, his lack of production was a stark contrast to his 8.1 PPG average and resulted in a negative defensive grade (-3.1).

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.2%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Clarkson made a minimal impact in his 16 minutes, scoring just 3 points on 1/3 shooting. While he did not hurt the team with mistakes, he also failed to provide the scoring punch he is typically known for, reflected in a -0.5 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.9%
Net Rtg +7.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
4
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.7

Robinson generated value in limited minutes through his screening and hustle, earning a +5.0 Offense credit driven by 4 screen assists. Despite poor free-throw shooting (2/8), his activity on both ends resulted in positive play-by-play grades for Offense, Hustle, and Defense.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/8 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.1m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +5.7
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Alvarado provided a quick and efficient scoring burst in his limited minutes, scoring 4 points on 2/3 shooting in just over 6 minutes. His 3 deflections showcased his trademark defensive peskiness, contributing to a positive +1.9 Hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.5m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 42.1m
15
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.6

An avalanche of turnovers drove Harden's negative performance, as his 6 giveaways were a significant jump from his 4.3 season average. This carelessness, combined with highly inefficient shooting from the floor (5/16 FG) and deep (1/8 3P), resulted in a negative Offense credit of -2.9.

Shooting
FG 5/16 (31.2%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 40.2%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.1m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 6
29
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+23.5

A massive defensive outing powered Mitchell's game, as he generated a +13.8 Defense credit by racking up 6 steals and 6 deflections. This defensive chaos supplemented his efficient scoring (29 points on 12/23 shooting), though 4 turnovers slightly dampened his otherwise stellar offensive line.

Shooting
FG 12/23 (52.2%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 28.7%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.7m
Scoring +20.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense +10.7
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 6
BLK 1
TO 4
S Evan Mobley 40.1m
15
pts
14
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.2

A dominant defensive performance (+10.3 Defense credit) defined Mobley's night, as he held opponents to just 3/10 shooting and grabbed 14 rebounds, well above his 7.8 average. However, his offensive contributions were muted by inefficient shooting (6/16 FG) and 3 turnovers, which dragged down his overall line.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.1m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +12.9
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 3
S Jarrett Allen 35.4m
10
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.7

Allen's value came primarily from his offensive process rather than volume, generating a +13.5 Offense credit despite scoring below his average. His impact was felt through efficient finishing (3/6 FG) and playmaking (3.0 assists vs 0.9 avg), though opponents found success scoring against him (9/16 FG).

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/8 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.5%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -9.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Dean Wade 29.3m
10
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.6

Efficient floor-spacing drove Wade's performance, as he knocked down 3-of-5 from three-point range on his way to 10 points, more than double his season average. This offensive outburst (+13.1 Offense credit) was a significant departure from his recent play and provided a much-needed scoring lift from a reserve role.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 91.9%
USG% 7.6%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Sam Merrill 28.3m
12
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.5

Merrill provided a solid offensive spark off the bench, scoring 12 points and hitting 3-of-8 from deep to earn a +8.8 Offense credit. He also added value with his activity, chipping in 4 deflections while committing zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -21.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Max Strus 25.3m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.2

Turnovers and fouls plagued Strus in a quiet performance, as he committed 3 giveaways and 5 personal fouls in just 25 minutes. His scoring was limited to 8 points on 2/6 shooting from three, failing to provide his usual floor-spacing threat.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
-12.6

Schröder struggled mightily to score, shooting a frigid 1-for-9 from the field, which negated his otherwise solid floor game. He managed to contribute with 5 assists against zero turnovers, but the lack of scoring punch was the defining feature of his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +0.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring -3.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Keon Ellis 5.5m
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.8

In his brief 5 minutes of action, Ellis's primary contribution was getting to the free-throw line for 2 points, as he did not attempt a field goal. His appearance was marred by 2 turnovers, an uncharacteristic mistake given his 0.3 season average.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +60.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2