GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 46.4m
38
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+27.4

A masterful scoring barrage drove Brunson's performance, as he erupted for 38 points on efficient 15/29 shooting to produce a massive +23.7 Offense credit. He relentlessly attacked the paint and added disruptive defense with 3 steals and 4 deflections.

Shooting
FG 15/29 (51.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 7/10 (70.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.9%
USG% 32.7%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 46.4m
Scoring +26.4
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +7.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Mikal Bridges 42.3m
18
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.4

Hyper-efficient scoring defined Bridges's night, as he poured in 18 points on just 11 shots (64% FG) to generate a +9.8 Offense credit. He was a two-way force, adding 2 steals and holding his defensive matchups to 5/13 shooting.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.8%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.3m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
13
pts
13
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.9

A disastrous turnover problem undermined an otherwise strong defensive effort from Towns, as his 7 giveaways were more than triple his season average (2.1). While he generated a +8.0 Defense credit and held matchups to 33% shooting, the constant possessions he gave away erased that value.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.4m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +13.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -16.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 7
S OG Anunoby 34.3m
13
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.9

Anunoby manufactured production at the free-throw line (8/10 FT) to salvage an otherwise difficult shooting night where he went just 2-for-9 from the field. His defensive presence remained a positive, holding opponents to 3/9 shooting and earning a +6.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.5%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +23.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Josh Hart 30.5m
13
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
0.0

Hart's disruptive activity was his calling card, as he tallied 6 deflections that helped fuel a +5.0 Defense credit. He complemented his hustle with solid all-around production, chipping in 13 points, 7 rebounds, and 4 assists.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.7%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -31.3
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +2.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
9
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.0

Hyper-efficient shooting defined Shamet's impactful bench minutes, as he went a perfect 3-for-3 from deep and posted a massive +25 plus-minus. His offensive spark (+8.2 Offense credit) was supplemented by solid hustle plays, including drawing a charge and holding opponents to 0/3 shooting.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 112.5%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +75.7
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.1

McBride was a non-factor offensively, going scoreless on 0/1 shooting in over 16 minutes of play. While he didn't commit any turnovers, his lack of production was a stark contrast to his 8.1 PPG average and resulted in a negative defensive grade (-3.1).

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.2%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.3

Clarkson made a minimal impact in his 16 minutes, scoring just 3 points on 1/3 shooting. While he did not hurt the team with mistakes, he also failed to provide the scoring punch he is typically known for, reflected in a -0.5 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.9%
Net Rtg +7.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
4
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.1

Robinson generated value in limited minutes through his screening and hustle, earning a +5.0 Offense credit driven by 4 screen assists. Despite poor free-throw shooting (2/8), his activity on both ends resulted in positive play-by-play grades for Offense, Hustle, and Defense.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/8 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.1m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +5.7
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.2

Alvarado provided a quick and efficient scoring burst in his limited minutes, scoring 4 points on 2/3 shooting in just over 6 minutes. His 3 deflections showcased his trademark defensive peskiness, contributing to a positive +1.9 Hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.5m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
CLE Cleveland Cavaliers
S James Harden 42.1m
15
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.1

An avalanche of turnovers drove Harden's negative performance, as his 6 giveaways were a significant jump from his 4.3 season average. This carelessness, combined with highly inefficient shooting from the floor (5/16 FG) and deep (1/8 3P), resulted in a negative Offense credit of -2.9.

Shooting
FG 5/16 (31.2%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 40.2%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.1m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 6
29
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+25.1

A massive defensive outing powered Mitchell's game, as he generated a +13.8 Defense credit by racking up 6 steals and 6 deflections. This defensive chaos supplemented his efficient scoring (29 points on 12/23 shooting), though 4 turnovers slightly dampened his otherwise stellar offensive line.

Shooting
FG 12/23 (52.2%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 28.7%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.7m
Scoring +20.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense +10.7
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 6
BLK 1
TO 4
S Evan Mobley 40.1m
15
pts
14
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.3

A dominant defensive performance (+10.3 Defense credit) defined Mobley's night, as he held opponents to just 3/10 shooting and grabbed 14 rebounds, well above his 7.8 average. However, his offensive contributions were muted by inefficient shooting (6/16 FG) and 3 turnovers, which dragged down his overall line.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.1m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +12.9
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 3
S Jarrett Allen 35.4m
10
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.7

Allen's value came primarily from his offensive process rather than volume, generating a +13.5 Offense credit despite scoring below his average. His impact was felt through efficient finishing (3/6 FG) and playmaking (3.0 assists vs 0.9 avg), though opponents found success scoring against him (9/16 FG).

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/8 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.5%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -9.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Dean Wade 29.3m
10
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.8

Efficient floor-spacing drove Wade's performance, as he knocked down 3-of-5 from three-point range on his way to 10 points, more than double his season average. This offensive outburst (+13.1 Offense credit) was a significant departure from his recent play and provided a much-needed scoring lift from a reserve role.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 91.9%
USG% 7.6%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Sam Merrill 28.3m
12
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.5

Merrill provided a solid offensive spark off the bench, scoring 12 points and hitting 3-of-8 from deep to earn a +8.8 Offense credit. He also added value with his activity, chipping in 4 deflections while committing zero turnovers.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -21.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Max Strus 25.3m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.2

Turnovers and fouls plagued Strus in a quiet performance, as he committed 3 giveaways and 5 personal fouls in just 25 minutes. His scoring was limited to 8 points on 2/6 shooting from three, failing to provide his usual floor-spacing threat.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
-13.0

Schröder struggled mightily to score, shooting a frigid 1-for-9 from the field, which negated his otherwise solid floor game. He managed to contribute with 5 assists against zero turnovers, but the lack of scoring punch was the defining feature of his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +0.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring -3.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Keon Ellis 5.5m
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.6

In his brief 5 minutes of action, Ellis's primary contribution was getting to the free-throw line for 2 points, as he did not attempt a field goal. His appearance was marred by 2 turnovers, an uncharacteristic mistake given his 0.3 season average.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +60.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2