Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAC lead LAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
LAL 2P — 3P —
SAC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 166 attempts

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

Dončić Hard 16/25 +10.8
James 8/17 -2.1
Ayton 4/7 +0.3
LaRavia Hard 1/7 -5.4
Vincent Hard 3/6 +3.0
Hayes Open 5/6 +2.4
Knecht Hard 2/6 -1.2
Smart 0/5 -5.6
Vanderbilt Hard 0/3 -3.4
James Hard 2/2 +3.8

SAC SAC Shot-making Δ

DeRozan Hard 14/19 +11.8
Westbrook Hard 8/16 +4.9
Monk Hard 9/15 +10.5
LaVine Hard 6/11 +4.1
Raynaud 5/8 +3.1
Achiuwa Open 4/7 +0.7
Cardwell 1/3 -1.1
Clifford Hard 0/2 -1.7
Ellis Hard 1/1 +1.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
LAL
SAC
41/84 Field Goals 48/82
48.8% Field Goal % 58.5%
8/36 3-Pointers 17/26
22.2% 3-Point % 65.4%
22/28 Free Throws 11/14
78.6% Free Throw % 78.6%
58.1% True Shooting % 70.3%
46 Total Rebounds 41
12 Offensive 6
27 Defensive 26
21 Assists 23
2.10 Assist/TO Ratio 1.53
10 Turnovers 12
9 Steals 6
2 Blocks 4
9 Fouls 18
58 Points in Paint 46
16 Fast Break Pts 12
17 Points off TOs 8
15 Second Chance Pts 7
32 Bench Points 31
9 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Luka Dončić
42 PTS · 7 REB · 8 AST · 36.9 MIN
+42.24
2
DeMar DeRozan
32 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 36.8 MIN
+36.08
3
Malik Monk
26 PTS · 1 REB · 8 AST · 31.7 MIN
+21.57
4
Zach LaVine
19 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 31.6 MIN
+15.64
5
Deandre Ayton
13 PTS · 13 REB · 1 AST · 27.4 MIN
+14.77
6
Jaxson Hayes
12 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 18.7 MIN
+14.32
7
LeBron James
22 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 33.2 MIN
+12.89
8
Russell Westbrook
22 PTS · 5 REB · 7 AST · 34.4 MIN
+10.17
9
Precious Achiuwa
9 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 30.4 MIN
+9.03
10
Gabe Vincent
9 PTS · 0 REB · 1 AST · 18.4 MIN
+8.52
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:08 B. James 24' 3PT (6 PTS) (M. Kleber 1 AST) 112–124
Q4 0:15 SAC shot clock Team TURNOVER 109–124
Q4 0:39 D. Knecht driving DUNK (5 PTS) 109–124
Q4 0:46 M. Raynaud 10' driving floating Jump Shot (11 PTS) 107–124
Q4 1:06 B. James 24' 3PT pullup (3 PTS) (D. Knecht 1 AST) 107–122
Q4 1:18 D. DeRozan 8' driving finger roll Layup (32 PTS) 104–122
Q4 1:37 P. Achiuwa REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 104–120
Q4 1:38 MISS D. Knecht 27' pullup 3PT 104–120
Q4 1:53 P. Achiuwa 3PT (9 PTS) (M. Monk 8 AST) 104–120
Q4 2:13 R. Westbrook REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 104–117
Q4 2:14 MISS L. Dončić 29' 3PT 104–117
Q4 2:27 M. Monk 26' 3PT (26 PTS) (D. DeRozan 6 AST) 104–117
Q4 2:41 M. Monk STEAL (1 STL) 104–114
Q4 2:41 L. James bad pass TURNOVER (3 TO) 104–114
Q4 2:59 D. DeRozan 18' pullup Jump Shot (30 PTS) 104–114

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAC Sacramento Kings
S DeMar DeRozan 36.8m
32
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+31.2

A midrange masterclass drove an exceptionally high positive rating, punishing defenders with elite shot-making inside the arc. Operating with peak efficiency, he completely bypassed the three-point line while still dominating the offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 14/19 (73.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.5%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg +5.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring +28.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +7.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 72.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
22
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+0.3

High-volume offensive creation was severely undercut by the hidden costs of live-ball mistakes and erratic pacing. Even with a surprisingly hot hand from beyond the arc, the chaotic nature of his possessions ultimately gave more points back to the opposition.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 30.7%
Net Rtg +12.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +15.4
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +6.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Zach LaVine 31.6m
19
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.6

Selective and highly efficient perimeter shot-making ensured his minutes were a net positive. He avoided forcing bad looks, allowing his clean outside stroke to naturally boost the offense.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.5%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +16.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.6m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Maxime Raynaud 31.3m
11
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.4

Despite maintaining his recent streak of highly efficient shooting, hidden costs elsewhere on the floor dragged his overall rating down. The solid box score numbers masked defensive lapses that allowed opponents to capitalize during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +5.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.0

Strong defensive rotations and active hustle plays were slightly offset by a significant drop in his usual scoring volume. He remained efficient when calling his own number, but the lack of offensive aggression kept his net impact hovering near neutral.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +19.9
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +8.9
Defense -2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
Malik Monk 31.7m
26
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
+12.8

A blistering shooting display from beyond the arc single-handedly drove his positive impact rating. Punishing drop coverage and late closeouts, his elite perimeter execution completely warped the opposing defense.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 7/9 (77.8%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.2%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.7m
Scoring +22.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +8.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.9

Struggling to find a rhythm offensively, his inability to finish around the rim negated his decent work on the glass. The lack of scoring gravity allowed defenders to sag off, stalling the offensive engine during his rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +8.9
Defense -4.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.3

Failing to convert any of his looks, his offensive disappearing act resulted in a heavily negative overall rating. The complete lack of scoring punch stalled out the second unit, erasing the value of his adequate defensive positioning.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +15.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Keon Ellis 11.7m
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

Extreme passivity on the offensive end caused a sharp decline from his recent production levels. Taking only a single shot attempt in double-digit minutes rendered him an offensive non-threat, hurting the team's floor spacing.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 4.0%
Net Rtg +19.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Luka Dončić 36.9m
42
pts
7
reb
8
ast
Impact
+43.1

Absolute surgical precision inside the arc fueled a monstrous overall rating. Even with a high volume of missed perimeter heat-checks, his relentless rim pressure and exceptional defensive engagement overwhelmed the opposition.

Shooting
FG 16/25 (64.0%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.6%
USG% 38.8%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +35.4
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +9.5
Hustle +7.0
Defense +6.4
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 4
S LeBron James 33.2m
22
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.7

Despite exceeding his recent scoring output, perimeter struggles severely dragged down his overall impact. Blanking on all attempts from beyond the arc created empty possessions that offset his otherwise solid defensive metrics.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.0%
USG% 30.7%
Net Rtg -8.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +15.9
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jake LaRavia 31.0m
2
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-11.8

Tremendous hustle metrics and active rotations were completely negated by an abysmal shooting night. Firing blanks from the perimeter killed offensive momentum, resulting in a steep drop-off from his normally efficient finishing.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 14.3%
USG% 9.7%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Marcus Smart 30.5m
1
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.4

Continuing a brutal offensive slump, his inability to convert a single field goal attempt cratered his net impact. While his point-of-attack defense remained disruptive, the completely empty offensive possessions made him a massive net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 8.5%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -28.4
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring -3.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Deandre Ayton 27.4m
13
pts
13
reb
1
ast
Impact
+15.4

Anchoring the paint with elite defensive positioning drove a highly positive overall rating. He continued his streak of hyper-efficient interior finishing, ensuring that his touches consistently yielded high-value looks.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -21.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +16.5
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-18.7

A complete non-factor on the offensive end, he failed to register a single point while missing all his attempts. Without his usual disruptive defensive energy to compensate, his presence on the floor was severely detrimental to the team's spacing and flow.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaxson Hayes 18.7m
12
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.4

Elite rim-running and highly efficient finishing around the basket maximized his limited minutes. By staying strictly within his role and avoiding wasted possessions, he generated a stellar positive impact.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -7.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Gabe Vincent 18.4m
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.3

Breaking out of a recent shooting funk, timely perimeter shot-making provided a much-needed spark off the bench. His ability to stretch the floor efficiently kept his overall impact slightly in the green despite limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -23.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

Forced perimeter looks and a lack of secondary hustle plays dragged his overall rating into the red. While he finally broke a recent scoreless streak, the shot selection remained too inefficient to justify the attempts.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg +7.4
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Registered essentially empty cardio during a brief stint on the floor. A lack of tangible involvement on either end of the court led to a slightly negative baseline rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.0
Turnovers -1.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.6

Another virtually invisible performance extended his recent stretch of offensive irrelevance. He logged minimal court time without attempting a shot, resulting in a negligible negative footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

Perfect execution during a brief cameo appearance resulted in a massive per-minute impact spike. Nailing consecutive perimeter looks provided an instant, flawless offensive injection.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.9m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0