2025-26 Season
RYAN NEMBHARD
2025-26 Season
RYAN NEMBHARD
Nembhard produces at an poor rate for a 20-minute workload.
Nembhard produces at an poor rate for a 20-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Ryan Nembhard’s opening twenty games of the 2025-26 season were defined by a sudden mid-November promotion to the starting lineup that yielded wild swings in effectiveness. Given the keys to the offense, he erupted on 12/02 vs DEN. He poured in 28 points and 10 assists on blazing 12-for-14 shooting to earn a massive +18.5 Impact score, driven entirely by elite shot selection and flawless half-court execution. Yet, as the month dragged on, the heavy workload exposed his flaws. This inconsistency was perfectly captured on 12/16 vs UTA. Despite logging a double-double with 14 points and 11 assists, Nembhard posted a dismal -4.4 Impact score because hidden costs like poor offensive sequencing and empty possessions dragged him down. Things bottomed out completely on 12/23 vs NOP when a disastrous 2-for-13 shooting night resulted in a brutal -21.0 Impact score. The flashes of brilliance are undeniably real, but his erratic decision-making reveals a guard who still needs to learn how to manage a game when his jumper stops falling.
Ryan Nembhard's mid-season stretch was defined by a brutal demotion to the bench and a prolonged crisis of offensive efficiency. After opening this block in the starting five, he was quickly relegated to the second unit. Look no further than the 01/16 vs UTA matchup, where he tallied 10 assists but still posted a dismal -13.0 Impact score. That severe negative rating exposes the hidden costs of his floor game; his passing was entirely undone by dreadful shot selection and a 3-for-9 shooting night that killed offensive momentum. He managed exactly one positive outing during these twenty games, scraping together a +1.5 Impact on 01/11 vs CHI. In that rare start, he finally found his rhythm, dropping 16 points and hitting three of his six attempts from deep to actually reward his coach's trust. The relief was painfully short-lived. During a disastrous 03/01 vs OKC appearance, he clanked his way to a 2-for-9 shooting line and generated a catastrophic -16.7 Impact because his sheer inability to score essentially forced his team to play four-on-five.
Ryan Nembhard’s bumpy transition from the end of the bench to the starting rotation was defined by severe growing pains and erratic shot selection. When given heavy minutes on 03/16 vs NOP, he posted a disastrous -16.0 Impact score. He forced bad looks all night, bricking seven of his eight field goal attempts while his modest five assists failed to offset the offensive bleeding. Even when he found his scoring touch on 04/10 vs SAS with 13 points and seven assists, his -6.4 Impact score revealed the hidden costs of his inefficiency. He needed 13 shot attempts to get those points, stalling the offensive flow and dragging down his overall value on the floor. However, the guard finally put the puzzle pieces together on 04/12 vs CHI. Racking up 15 points, nine rebounds, and an absurd 23 assists, Nembhard earned a +3.8 Impact score by abandoning the selfish chucking to masterfully orchestrate the offense.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Nembhard has posted negative impact in 85% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 45% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Average defender. Nembhard doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 14 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
60 games played