CLE

2025-26 Season

MAX STRUS

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard-Forward | 6-5
Max Strus
13.8 PPG
5.9 RPG
1.9 APG
24.4 MPG
+0.1 Impact

Strus produces at an average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.1
Scoring +10.2
Points 13.8 PPG × +1.00 = +13.8
Missed 2PT 0.5/g × -0.78 = -0.4
Missed 3PT 3.6/g × -0.87 = -3.1
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +2.8
Assists 1.9/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.5/g × +1.26 = +1.9
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +0.3
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.0/g × +0.90 = +0.0
Def. Rebounds 4.4/g × +0.30 = +1.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.8
Contested Shots 3.4/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.0/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.0/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Raw Impact +13.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −13.2
Net Impact
+0.1
71st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Strus's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~11 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Strus locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -3.3, second-half: +3.5. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 8 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Podziemski 21.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 7
L. Dončić 16.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
T. da Silva 14.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Buzelis 11.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 11.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Poulakidas 10.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.84
PTS 9
J. Jaquez Jr. 10.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.68
PTS 7
K. Middleton 9.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 5
J. Howard 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Yabusele 9.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Dončić 26.6 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.56
PTS 15
B. Podziemski 22.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 11
P. Banchero 16.1 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.87
PTS 14
G. Yabusele 12.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 5
O. Dieng 11.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
M. Buzelis 10.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
T. da Silva 10.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 5
Z. Williamson 9.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 5
D. Queen 9.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 2
P. Williams 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

8
Games
13.8
PPG
5.9
RPG
1.9
APG
0.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
53.5
FG%
50.0
3P%
83.3
FT%
24.4
MPG