BOS

2025-26 Season

HUGO GONZÁLEZ

Boston Celtics | Guard | 6-6
Hugo González
3.9 PPG
3.4 RPG
0.5 APG
14.7 MPG
-1.7 Impact

González produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.7
Scoring +2.3
Points 3.9 PPG × +1.00 = +3.9
Missed 2PT 0.7/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 1.0/g × -0.87 = -0.9
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.2
Assists 0.5/g × +0.50 = +0.2
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0
Defense +0.3
Steals 0.5/g × +2.30 = +1.1
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.5/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.0/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.0
Net Impact
-1.7
46th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 6th
4.0 PPG
Efficiency 50th
54.7% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 66th
3.6 RPG
Rim Protection 64th
0.13/min
Hustle 37th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 79th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Hugo González spent his first twenty games locked in a chaotic struggle to find a stable rotational foothold, swinging wildly between spark-plug energy and complete invisibility. When he tried to force his offensive rhythm, the results were disastrous. During his 11/01 vs HOU appearance, he aggressively hunted his own shot to tally 7 points, but his disjointed floor game and poor shot selection dragged his impact score down to a brutal -11.3. He flipped the script during a sudden offensive explosion on 12/04 vs WAS. By replacing hesitant jumpers with decisive, high-percentage attacks on the basket, he poured in a season-high 14 points and generated a stellar +8.1 impact score. Yet his most sustainable value often arrived when he simply played within the flow of the offense rather than hunting buckets. During the 10/31 vs PHI contest, he scored just 5 points but posted a +4.1 impact by making quick decisions, attacking closeouts with purpose, and providing highly efficient two-way energy. To survive in this league, he must realize that frantic shot-hunting will only staple him to the bench.

Hugo González spent the middle of his season battling wild fluctuations in reliability, operating as a high-energy sparkplug one night and an outright liability the next. When fully engaged, his sheer hustle easily masked his offensive limitations. On 01/05 vs CHI, he managed a +2.8 impact score despite shooting a miserable 1-for-5 from the floor simply because he crashed the glass with reckless abandon to secure 7 rebounds. Conversely, his defensive lapses frequently destroyed the value of his most productive scoring nights. During a heavy 30-minute shift on 01/17 vs ATL, he scored 7 points and grabbed 8 boards but suffered a brutal -12.8 impact mark by constantly bleeding points on the defensive end. A similar disaster unfolded on 01/28 vs ATL, where a highly efficient 10-point outburst was entirely erased by a -3.7 impact rating because he gave up easy baskets during his shifts. To stick in this rotation, González must realize that hitting a few outside shots means absolutely nothing if he hands it all right back on defense.

A brutal offensive slump defined the early portion of this stretch, leaving Hugo González looking completely lost before he finally figured out how to impact winning. His struggles bottomed out vs SAC on 01/30, where an utter inability to connect on open looks paralyzed the offense and resulted in a catastrophic -12.8 impact score. He eventually found ways to generate positive value without dominating the ball, a shift perfectly captured vs GSW on 02/19. Despite scoring a modest 7 points, he posted a +3.1 impact score by utilizing excellent spatial awareness to consistently fill the correct transition lanes. Everything truly clicked when he was thrust into the starting lineup vs MIL on 03/02. He erupted for 18 points and 16 rebounds in that contest, generating a massive +13.3 impact score by delivering an absolute defensive masterclass that completely shut down his assignments.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Below-average consistency. González is negative impact in 68% of games, with scoring moving ~4 points game-to-game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games González locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -1.8, second-half -1.7. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. Siakam 61.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
J. Brunson 29.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7
L. Kennard 28.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 24.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. Robinson 24.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. McCollum 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Johnson 23.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
M. Monk 23.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 20.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

P. Siakam 61.2 poss
FG% 35.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 14
C. Cunningham 35.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 10
C. McCollum 25.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 9
J. Johnson 24.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6
F. Wagner 23.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
B. Adebayo 22.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 7
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 10
A. Gordon 21.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 5
J. Brunson 20.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

71
Games
3.9
PPG
3.4
RPG
0.5
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
47.3
FG%
35.1
3P%
50.0
FT%
14.7
MPG

GAME LOG

71 games played