BOS

2025-26 Season

HUGO GONZÁLEZ

Boston Celtics | Guard | 6-6
Hugo González
3.7PPG
3.2RPG
0.5APG
14.1MPG
-5.8 Impact

González produces at an poor rate for a 14-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.8
Scoring +3.3
Points Scored 3.7 PPG = +3.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.9
Creation +0.1
Assists & Self-Creation 0.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.1
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Rebounds 3.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.2
Contested Shots 2.3/g = +0.5
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +4.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.6
Net Impact
-5.8
17th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 6th
4.1 PPG
Efficiency 49th
54.4% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 66th
3.5 RPG
Defense 52th
+7.5/g
Hustle 99th
+20.3/g
Creation 4th
+1.12/g
Shot Making 13th
+3.97/g
TO Discipline 82th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Hugo González spent the first two months of the 2025-26 campaign wandering through an agonizing identity crisis before finally carving out a niche as a gritty, glass-crashing rotational piece. Early on, he was essentially a ghost on the floor. He stumbled through an abysmal start on 10/26 vs DET, logging zero points in 18 minutes and dragging the team down with a -9.9 impact score due to sheer offensive passivity. By late December, González finally embraced the dirty work, transforming into a relentless rebounding machine who peaked on 12/21 vs TOR with 10 points and 10 boards. That double-double earned him a massive +11.9 impact score, as his ferocious activity on the glass generated crucial extra possessions and overwhelmed the opponent's frontcourt. However, his glaring offensive limitations still cap his overall ceiling. Despite pulling down a season-high 11 rebounds in 37 minutes on 12/23 vs IND, he registered a -3.0 impact because his meager six points allowed the defense to completely ignore him and clog the paint. His raw motor is undeniable, but he desperately needs to find a consistent offensive pulse.

This grueling midseason stretch was defined by a severe offensive identity crisis that relegated Hugo González to the fringes of the rotation. He routinely floated through shifts as a complete non-factor, bottoming out on 01/04 vs LAC with a barren stat line of zero points, rebounds, and assists in ten minutes to generate a disastrous -15.3 Impact score. Even when he managed to score and rebound at a relatively high volume, hidden costs dragged him down. During a thirty-minute shift on 01/18 vs ATL, he tallied seven points and eight boards, but still posted a -7.5 Impact score because his utter lack of playmaking stalled the second unit's offense. He simply forced too many contested jumpers to stay on the floor, highlighted by an abysmal 1-for-8 shooting night on 01/30 vs SAC that resulted in a -11.7 Impact score. Yet, he occasionally found ways to contribute without filling up the basket. On 01/06 vs CHI, González scored just five points on terrible 1-for-5 shooting, but his relentless effort on the glass secured seven rebounds and salvaged a +0.8 Impact score. If he wants to survive in this league, he has to stop hijacking possessions and commit fully to that gritty, opportunistic style.

This brutal late-season stretch was defined by absolute irrelevance for Hugo González, save for one shocking mirage of starting brilliance. Given a rare spot start on 03/02 vs MIL, he erupted for 18 points and 16 rebounds in 35 minutes. His massive +32.3 Impact score that night stemmed directly from relentless rebounding and high-energy hustle plays that completely disrupted Milwaukee's frontcourt. But the moment he returned to the second unit, his value evaporated. During a disastrous stint on 03/14 vs WAS, he logged zero points, zero rebounds, and zero assists in 10 minutes. That empty cardio session earned him a miserable -13.4 Impact, as his complete lack of aggression and inability to secure loose balls dragged the bench unit down. Things hit rock bottom on 03/22 vs MIN, where poor shot selection and an 0-for-3 shooting night resulted in a -15.1 Impact. Unless he is dominating the glass with starter-level minutes, González simply bleeds value as a hesitant reserve.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. González has posted negative impact in 83% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games González locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 16 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. Siakam 61.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
J. Brunson 29.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7
L. Kennard 28.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 24.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. Robinson 24.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. McCollum 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Johnson 23.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
M. Monk 23.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Avdija 20.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

P. Siakam 61.2 poss
FG% 35.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 14
C. Cunningham 35.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 10
C. McCollum 25.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 9
J. Johnson 24.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6
F. Wagner 23.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
B. Adebayo 22.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 7
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 10
A. Gordon 21.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 5
J. Brunson 20.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

78
Games
3.7
PPG
3.2
RPG
0.5
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
47.0
FG%
35.3
3P%
46.4
FT%
14.1
MPG

GAME LOG

78 games played