POR

2025-26 Season

HANSEN YANG

Portland Trail Blazers | Center | 7-1
Hansen Yang
2.1PPG
1.5RPG
0.5APG
6.7MPG
-9.3 Impact

Yang produces at an poor rate for a 7-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-9.3
Scoring +1.2
Points Scored 2.1 PPG = +2.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.3
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 0.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.7/g (live + dead blend) = -1.8
Defense -0.8
Steals 0.1/g = +0.2
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 1.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.1
Contested Shots 2.4/g = +0.5
Deflections 0.4/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.8/g = +0.2
Raw Impact -0.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.2
Net Impact
-9.3
2th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 5th
3.1 PPG
Efficiency 2th
41.1% TS
Playmaking 24th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 3th
2.3 RPG
Defense 2th
+1.3/g
Hustle 2th
+5.4/g
Creation 3th
+0.88/g
Shot Making 6th
+1.52/g
TO Discipline 2th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Hansen Yang’s first fifteen games in the NBA were defined by deep-bench obscurity and a steep, punishing learning curve. Even when given an extended leash on 11/24 vs OKC, his dismal 3-for-11 shooting from the floor—including a brutal 1-for-6 from deep—dragged his overall value down to a -4.9 Impact score despite tallying 8 points, 4 rebounds, and 3 assists. He earned exactly one spot start on 12/07 vs MEM, but his passive offensive approach yielded just 4 points on five shot attempts in 19 minutes, resulting in a -9.5 Impact. Things hit rock bottom during a brief four-minute stint on 11/30 vs OKC, where he missed all three of his shots and posted a staggering -13.7 Impact. He bleeds value on the floor. Until Yang learns to process the game at an NBA speed and stops forcing bad perimeter shots, he will remain an afterthought in the rotation.

This midseason stretch was defined by a brutal fight for survival at the very end of the rotation. The struggles began immediately on 12/30 vs DAL, where a completely empty ten-minute shift—yielding zero points on two missed shots—resulted in a disastrous -19.0 impact score. Yang simply could not find any offensive rhythm. Look no further than the 01/10 vs HOU matchup, where he clanked his way to a 1-for-5 shooting night. By logging just two points in 13 minutes, he generated a miserable -15.3 impact because his poor shot selection actively killed team momentum. Even when he managed to grab a handful of boards, the underlying metrics refused to budge. During his 01/28 vs WAS outing, he tallied a stretch-high six points and five rebounds, yet still posted a -5.5 impact. Missing four of his six field goal attempts meant that any minor rebounding value was entirely erased by wasted offensive possessions.

Hansen Yang spent this late-season stretch marooned at the end of the bench, struggling to stay afloat during fleeting garbage-time cameos. Even when given a longer leash, he actively hurt the team with erratic shot selection. During an 11-minute stint on 03/29 vs WAS, Yang scored a stretch-high six points but posted a dismal -10.7 impact score because he forced up ugly jumpers and shot a woeful 1-for-5 from the floor. Shorter appearances were often complete disasters. He logged a catastrophic -17.9 impact in just three minutes on 02/07 vs MEM, running around aimlessly without attempting a single shot and bleeding points on the defensive end. Ironically, his only positive game occurred when he completely disappeared from the box score. On 04/10 vs LAC, Yang recorded a +0.3 impact in two minutes with zero points and zero rebounds, generating value simply by avoiding mistakes and playing quiet positional basketball. For a big man fighting for NBA survival, hemorrhaging value this rapidly in mop-up duty is a glaring red flag.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Yang has posted negative impact in 96% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 17% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Yang doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -10.4, second-half: -8.2. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 41 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 20 days ago

Based on 61 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Carlson 28.6 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
Z. Edey 24.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
C. Johnson 15.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Smith Jr. 13.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
M. Raynaud 13.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Isaac 12.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
I. Hartenstein 12.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 6
L. Garza 11.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Bryant 11.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Ayton 11.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 1

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Z. Edey 25.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
S. Adams 19.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
B. Carlson 16.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.54
PTS 9
C. Johnson 15.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
T. Jackson-Davis 13.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
I. Hartenstein 13.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Gill 10.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
L. Garza 10.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
T. Bryant 9.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Holmes II 9.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.51
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

45
Games
2.1
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.5
APG
0.1
SPG
0.2
BPG
31.0
FG%
11.9
3P%
82.4
FT%
6.7
MPG

GAME LOG

45 games played