2025-26 Season
TRAYCE JACKSON-DAVIS
2025-26 Season
TRAYCE JACKSON-DAVIS
Jackson-Davis produces at an below average rate for a 9-minute workload.
Jackson-Davis produces at an below average rate for a 9-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 14 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Trayce Jackson-Davis spent the first quarter of the 2025-26 season marooned in rotational purgatory. He struggled to find any rhythm during erratic bench minutes. Even when given an extended run, he routinely bled value on the floor, bottoming out on 11/12 vs OKC. Despite grabbing six rebounds and scoring six points in 22 minutes that night, he posted an abysmal -13.6 Impact score because his lack of offensive gravity and sloppy defensive positioning actively hurt the unit. Yet, a sudden promotion to the starting lineup on 11/20 vs MIA offered a fleeting glimpse of his ideal utility. Though he scored just eight points, Jackson-Davis dominated the glass with 12 rebounds to post a stellar +10.0 Impact score. He produced similar rugged efficiency on 12/13 vs MIN, turning 15 minutes of action into eight points, seven boards, and a +4.6 Impact score. Unfortunately, those isolated peaks were buried under a mountain of brief, ineffective cameos.
Trayce Jackson-Davis spent this midseason stretch battling irrelevance, slipping into a deep-bench afterthought who barely saw the floor. When given actual runway on 01/03 vs OKC, he generated a +2.6 Impact score despite an ugly 1-for-6 shooting night because he relentlessly hit the glass for nine rebounds and kept the offense flowing with three assists. That gritty performance followed a highly efficient outing on 12/30 vs BKN, where he converted five of his six shots to tally 11 points and six boards for another +2.6 Impact rating. The coaching trust vanished quickly after that. During a disastrous stint on 01/21 vs TOR, he posted a staggering -11.9 Impact score after logging zero points and zero rebounds across 12 completely empty minutes. You simply cannot survive in the modern NBA providing zero interior resistance or rebounding. If the young big man wants to escape garbage-time duty, he must find a way to leave a footprint immediately upon checking into the game.
This stretch of the season was defined by Trayce Jackson-Davis vanishing into the darkest corners of the bench. He actually started this block with a massive surge on 02/08 vs IND, racking up 10 points and 10 rebounds in just 16 minutes to generate a stellar +15.2 Impact score. That brief flash of dominant rebounding and efficient interior finishing quickly faded into a string of erratic garbage-time appearances. By the time he hit the floor on 03/11 vs NOP, he posted a brutal -9.5 Impact score in a measly three minutes because he forced three terrible, rushed shots (0-for-3 FG) instead of letting the offense flow. Things hit rock bottom on 03/23 vs UTA. Jackson-Davis logged seven minutes of pure cardio, grabbing a single rebound while putting up zeros across the rest of the box score to earn a staggering -17.4 Impact score. When a big man stops crashing the glass and starts rushing contested looks in limited minutes, his on-court value evaporates entirely.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Jackson-Davis has posted negative impact in 78% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 60% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Jackson-Davis consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Small downward trend. First-half impact: -3.3, second-half: -5.1. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.
In a rough stretch — 18 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 18 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 70 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
55 games played