BOS

2025-26 Season

LUKA GARZA

Boston Celtics | Center | 6-10
Luka Garza
7.7PPG
3.9RPG
0.9APG
15.5MPG
-1.1 Impact

Garza produces at an below average rate for a 16-minute workload. Defensive impact (-1.2/game) is a concern.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.1
Scoring +7.6
Points Scored 7.7 PPG = +7.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.6
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.9 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.5
Turnovers 0.6/g (live + dead blend) = -1.5
Defense -1.2
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.5
Hustle & Effort +4.3
Rebounds 3.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.0
Contested Shots 3.7/g = +0.7
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 2.1/g = +0.6
Raw Impact +9.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.7
Net Impact
-1.1
33th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 41th
8.2 PPG
Efficiency 85th
66.2% TS
Playmaking 30th
1.0 APG
Rebounding 20th
4.1 RPG
Defense 58th
+6.8/g
Hustle 30th
+13.3/g
Creation 13th
+1.54/g
Shot Making 62th
+5.79/g
TO Discipline 83th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Luka Garza’s early season was defined by wild volatility, swinging violently between dominant interior bursts and unplayable defensive lapses. Look at his outing on 11/16 vs LAC. He poured in 13 points on a blistering 5-for-6 shooting clip, but managed a meager +0.6 Impact score because his heavy feet bled points on the defensive end. Conversely, when he found his rhythm inside, he was a wrecking ball off the bench. He logged a massive +13.5 Impact on 11/09 vs ORL by bullying his way to 16 points and 8 rebounds on near-perfect 7-of-8 shooting. Yet his most valuable minutes actually arrived when he stopped hunting his own shot. During the 12/23 vs IND matchup, Garza attempted just two shots for 6 points but generated a stellar +11.0 Impact. He changed the math entirely through sheer effort, grabbing 9 rebounds, moving the ball, and anchoring the paint with surprising defensive resistance.

Luka Garza’s midseason run was defined by a volatile pendulum swing, morphing from an elite bench floor-spacer into an unplayable defensive liability. His scorching perimeter touch peaked on 02/03 vs DAL, where he drained all four of his three-point attempts to post a massive +17.3 Impact score and briefly earn a starting job. Yet, even when his shot was falling, his heavy feet in the paint frequently erased that offensive value. This glaring flaw was obvious on 01/24 vs BKN, where he tallied a respectable 12 points but bled open layups on the other end, resulting in a damaging -8.3 Impact score. Once his jumper inevitably cooled down, the hidden costs of keeping him on the floor became too steep for the coaching staff to justify. By the time he logged a disastrous -14.8 Impact score on 02/11 vs CHI—failing to record a single counting stat in seven empty minutes—Garza had effectively played himself out of the rotation.

Luka Garza’s late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between unplayable bench filler and explosive spot-starter. Take his performance on 04/01 vs MIA, where he poured in 12 points in just 15 minutes but still dragged the team down with a -5.3 Impact score. That negative mark stemmed from empty-calorie gunning, as he hoisted ten shots while completely ignoring his rebounding duties on the glass. Then there are the nights he simply vanishes. When given a massive runway on 03/10 vs SAS, Garza managed a brutal -14.6 Impact score by floating aimlessly for 24 minutes, grabbing zero rebounds and attempting just three shots. Yet, just when you write him off, he steps into the starting lineup on 04/12 vs ORL and completely bullies the opposition. He racked up 27 points and 12 rebounds in 38 minutes that night, posting a staggering +24.5 Impact score because he finally paired aggressive, efficient perimeter shooting with relentless interior board work.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Garza's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 79% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Average defender. Garza doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 71 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Okongwu 71.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 13
J. Huff 46.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
D. Sharpe 41.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
A. Sengun 37.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Duren 36.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
O. Prosper 30.9 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 11
M. Potter 30.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
V. Wembanyama 29.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
A. Drummond 28.4 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 12
N. Claxton 26.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Okongwu 55.7 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
A. Sengun 52.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
D. Sharpe 46.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11
V. Wembanyama 40.8 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.49
PTS 20
J. Huff 39.7 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Duren 37.5 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 15
M. Raynaud 36.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
I. Zubac 35.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 14
N. Claxton 32.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 7
O. Prosper 31.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

76
Games
7.7
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
SPG
0.4
BPG
57.3
FG%
42.1
3P%
77.6
FT%
15.5
MPG

GAME LOG

76 games played