MIN

2025-26 Season

KYLE ANDERSON

Minnesota Timberwolves | Forward-Guard | 6-8
Kyle Anderson
5.6PPG
3.1RPG
2.8APG
18.1MPG
-3.4 Impact

Anderson produces at an below average rate for a 18-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.4
Scoring +4.9
Points Scored 5.6 PPG = +5.6
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.1
Creation +0.6
Assists & Self-Creation 2.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.6
Turnovers -2.0
Turnovers 0.9/g (live + dead blend) = -2.0
Defense +0.7
Steals 0.9/g = +2.1
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Rebounds 3.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.5
Contested Shots 2.7/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.9/g = +1.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 1.2/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +6.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
-3.4
29th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
5.9 PPG
Efficiency 24th
52.1% TS
Playmaking 80th
2.9 APG
Rebounding 31th
3.3 RPG
Defense 69th
+8.1/g
Hustle 24th
+8.9/g
Creation 38th
+2.03/g
Shot Making 19th
+3.43/g
TO Discipline 43th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Kyle Anderson’s first fifteen games defined the absolute extremes of the veteran bench experience, swinging wildly between brilliant connective play and total offensive vanishing acts. During the 12/05 vs BKN matchup, he managed just eight points but generated an Impact: +9.9 rating by crashing the glass and making sharp defensive rotations. He tapped into a completely different gear on 01/02 vs LAC. Pouring in 22 points and eight rebounds on 8-for-10 shooting, he posted a staggering Impact: +23.7 mark. That rare scoring outburst highlighted his value when he aggressively attacks the paint instead of passively deferring on the perimeter. Unfortunately, those peaks were frequently offset by brutal stretches of invisibility, most notably during the 12/16 vs DAL contest. Missing all four of his shots and grabbing just a single rebound in 15 minutes, his lethargic floor spacing and defensive lapses resulted in a disastrous Impact: -21.1 rating.

Kyle Anderson’s mid-season stretch was defined by maddening offensive passivity and a fleeting promotion to the starting lineup. He briefly looked like a vital connective piece on 01/28 vs LAC, earning a +6.7 Impact score by aggressively hunting his own shot for 12 points and dishing five assists. That brief burst of aggression earned him a starting nod on 02/07 vs POR, where he posted an efficient 11 points and a +6.1 Impact score. The success was short-lived. Anderson quickly retreated into an offensive shell, dragging down his overall value by refusing to look at the rim. His reluctance bottomed out on 03/13 vs GSW with a catastrophic -16.3 Impact score. Even though he grabbed five rebounds in 15 minutes of action, his 0-for-2 shooting and total lack of scoring gravity crippled the offense.

Kyle Anderson’s mid-spring stretch was defined by a brutal, invisible slump off the bench that only briefly vanished when he was thrust into the starting lineup. Operating as a reserve, his complete lack of scoring gravity frequently stalled the offense. This passive play bottomed out on 03/30 vs DAL, where he posted a disastrous -11.4 impact after failing to score a single point, bleeding value as defenders simply ignored his 0-for-2 shooting. He occasionally managed to salvage his minutes through sheer rebounding and dirty work, posting a +5.4 impact on 04/02 vs DET despite scoring just 2 points. A sudden promotion changed everything. Given the keys to operate as a primary offensive hub on 04/10 vs HOU, Anderson racked up 17 points, 6 rebounds, and 9 assists. He generated a massive +11.8 impact in that start by picking apart the defense with surgical passing and efficient 7-of-12 shooting.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Anderson has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Anderson consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -2.0, second-half: -4.8. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 7 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Cisse 48.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
D. Powell 45.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
K. Huerter 32.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
A. Sengun 28.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
G. Santos 28.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
D. Sharpe 25.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. Green 22.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
R. Kalkbrenner 22.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 6
D. Clingan 22.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6
N. Batum 21.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Cisse 48.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
D. Powell 43.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
D. Green 33.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8
D. Clingan 28.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
G. Santos 28.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
R. Dunn 27.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
N. Batum 23.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
C. LeVert 23.2 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
D. Sharpe 22.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
R. Nembhard 22.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

50
Games
5.6
PPG
3.1
RPG
2.8
APG
0.9
SPG
0.5
BPG
51.9
FG%
33.3
3P%
67.1
FT%
18.1
MPG

GAME LOG

50 games played