GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Jordan Poole 34.3m
22
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.4

Breaking out of a severe shooting slump, his dynamic shot creation revitalized the offensive attack. He mixed aggressive drives with timely perimeter pull-ups, keeping the defense constantly off balance. Crucially, he paired the scoring outburst with active hands in passing lanes to generate transition chances.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.2%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg -26.7
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +15.0
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Trey Murphy III 33.6m
7
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.0

A severe regression in perimeter efficiency crippled his impact, as he bricked multiple wide-open looks. The inability to stretch the floor clogged the driving lanes for his teammates, bogging down the half-court offense. Even decent defensive effort couldn't offset the damage of those empty offensive trips.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.5%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jeremiah Fears 26.5m
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-18.8

An absolute disaster class in shot selection tanked his rating, as he repeatedly forced contested looks early in the shot clock. The resulting bricks functioned like live-ball turnovers, fueling opponent fast breaks and destroying offensive momentum. A steep drop-off from his usual scoring output left a massive void in the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/11 (9.1%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 9.1%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg -63.5
+/- -31
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring -5.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -8.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Herbert Jones 22.7m
11
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Uncharacteristic defensive lapses dragged his overall value into the red despite an uptick in scoring production. He struggled to navigate screens, allowing straight-line drives that compromised the entire defensive shell. The extra offensive output couldn't mask the points surrendered on his watch.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -63.8
+/- -29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Yves Missi 19.4m
11
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.2

Explosive finishing around the rim drove a massive spike in his offensive value. He feasted on dump-off passes and offensive putbacks, exploiting a clear athletic advantage in the paint. This sudden surge in interior efficiency provided a critical secondary scoring punch.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.7%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -22.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +7.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Saddiq Bey 24.2m
11
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.3

Stellar defensive metrics were dragged down by a lack of offensive volume and stalled perimeter spacing. He spent too much time floating on the weak side rather than aggressively attacking closeouts. While he locked down his primary assignment, the inability to generate consistent offense hurt the bottom line.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.4

Elite point-of-attack harassment and relentless hustle defined a highly disruptive performance. He blew up multiple dribble hand-offs and generated crucial extra possessions by diving for loose balls. This chaotic defensive energy completely derailed the opponent's offensive rhythm.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -6.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Derik Queen 21.7m
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.3

Highly efficient interior play and solid positional defense yielded a strong positive rating. He sealed his man effectively in the post and finished through contact, providing a reliable safety valve when perimeter actions broke down. Disciplined verticality at the rim further enhanced his overall contribution.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.2%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

A total offensive vanishing act severely hampered the second unit's spacing and flow. He failed to connect on any of his perimeter attempts, allowing defenders to sag off and pack the paint. The lack of scoring gravity turned his minutes into a significant net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -37.9
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Scoring -3.9
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.4

Veteran savvy and elite rim protection anchored a highly productive short stint. He controlled the defensive glass with authority and deterred multiple drives simply by maintaining perfect drop positioning. Flawless execution of his role as a lob threat and defensive backstop maximized his limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.0m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.4

Empty offensive possessions and a lack of defensive engagement led to a quick negative swing. He settled for low-percentage jumpers instead of attacking the rim to draw contact. The resulting transition opportunities for the opponent quickly forced him back to the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -150.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Scraped out a positive rating by converting his limited offensive opportunities during a brief appearance. He found soft spots in the zone to keep the chains moving without forcing the issue. The quiet efficiency was enough to win his minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -150.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.3

A sudden halt to his recent streak of efficient scoring resulted in a slightly negative impact. He struggled to establish deep post position and rushed his few attempts around the basket. The inability to replicate his usual interior presence left the offense searching for answers.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -150.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
BOS Boston Celtics
S Derrick White 31.1m
11
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
-0.7

A disastrous night from beyond the arc torpedoed his overall value, stalling offensive possessions and tanking his net impact. He continued to fire away despite the icy perimeter touch, which led to long rebounds and transition opportunities going the other way. Even his reliable playmaking couldn't salvage the negative swing from the wasted possessions.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/9 (11.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 39.3%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
18
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
+13.4

Masterful orchestration of the half-court offense kept his impact firmly in the green. He manipulated pick-and-roll coverages beautifully to generate high-quality looks for teammates while maintaining his own scoring threat. The steady hand at the controls prevented opposing runs during crucial stretches.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.7%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +43.5
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Josh Minott 28.1m
15
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.2

Elite two-way activity drove a massive positive rating, anchored by relentless defensive pressure and high-level hustle plays. He consistently beat his man to loose balls and converted efficiently in the painted area. This type of high-motor, low-maintenance performance perfectly complemented the primary scorers.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +76.4
+/- +42
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +8.5
Defense +2.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jaylen Brown 24.3m
15
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.7

A sharp drop-off in scoring volume cratered his overall impact despite decent peripheral defensive metrics. He failed to establish his usual offensive rhythm, settling for tough looks rather than aggressively attacking the rim. The resulting lack of offensive gravity allowed the defense to key in on secondary options and stall the half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +8.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Neemias Queta 22.2m
6
pts
11
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.2

Scoring regression didn't hinder his value thanks to a dominant interior defensive presence. He controlled the glass and altered shots in the paint, masking his quiet night on the offensive end. His ability to anchor the drop coverage effectively neutralized opponent drives and secured the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +27.9
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +13.0
Defense -1.5
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 4
TO 1
25
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+21.0

Lethal perimeter shot creation fueled a highly productive outing, forcing defenders to guard him well beyond the arc. His ability to hit contested pull-ups tilted the floor geometry, opening up driving lanes for the entire unit. Solid rotational defense ensured he didn't give back his offensive gains.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 6/13 (46.2%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg +15.7
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +19.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Sam Hauser 26.0m
9
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

Outstanding hustle and defensive rotations were completely undone by poor shot selection and perimeter clanks. He failed to punish defensive closeouts, settling for contested looks that short-circuited offensive sets. The high-effort closeouts on defense barely kept his overall rating near neutral.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +29.1
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Luka Garza 19.3m
16
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.3

Continuing a scorching offensive stretch, his floor-spacing from the center position completely broke the opponent's defensive shell. He paired elite shot-making with tremendous hustle, fighting through screens and securing extra possessions. The resulting offensive surge heavily outweighed his average defensive metrics.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 91.3%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +42.5
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.3m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.7

A quiet offensive night was salvaged entirely by surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense. He stayed attached to shooters through off-ball screens, limiting clean catch-and-shoot opportunities. This defensive discipline allowed him to tread water despite the lack of scoring punch.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +20.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.0m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.7

Maximized a brief rotational stint by converting every touch and generating crucial hustle events. He set bone-crushing screens that freed up ball-handlers and rolled with purpose to the rim. This hyper-efficient burst of physicality provided a massive spark to the second unit.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +48.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.5m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.6

A completely invisible stint resulted in a sharp negative rating due to missed assignments and empty possessions. He failed to register any positive hustle metrics, floating on the perimeter instead of engaging in the paint. The lack of energy forced a quick hook from the coaching staff.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Carded a negligible negative rating during a brief mop-up assignment. A single positive defensive rotation was the only blip on the radar. He simply ran out the clock without forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +133.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.4m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -0.5
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

Garbage time minutes yielded a perfectly neutral rating. He managed a quick hustle play to keep the ball alive but otherwise stayed out of the way. The sample size was simply too small to impact the game's broader narrative.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +133.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.4m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.8
Turnovers -1.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0