2025-26 Season
BRYCE MCGOWENS
2025-26 Season
BRYCE MCGOWENS
McGowens produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.
McGowens produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 16 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Bryce McGowens spent the first month of the 2025-26 season clawing his way out of garbage time to ultimately seize a starting job. Early appearances were brutal. During a 10/27 vs BOS outing, he missed both his shots and posted a dismal -9.4 Impact score in just three minutes of aimless cardio. Promoted to the starting unit a month later, McGowens finally found his rhythm on 12/01 vs LAL. He poured in 23 points, grabbed seven rebounds, and dished five assists, generating a stellar +7.1 Impact score through sheer offensive volume and aggressive glass-cleaning. The growing pains of a larger role immediately returned on 12/03 vs MIN, however. Despite playing 26 minutes, he vanished completely with just six points on five shot attempts, plummeting to a -9.4 Impact score because his extreme passivity starved the offense of any meaningful spacing or creation.
Bryce McGowens’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening volatility, as he bounced between the starting lineup and the bench while oscillating between lethal shooting and total invisibility. He looked like a premier weapon on 12/12 vs POR, pouring in 23 points on a flawless 5-for-5 from beyond the arc to generate a massive +22.2 impact score. Yet he also found ways to contribute when his scoring dried up, notably on 12/24 vs CLE. Despite logging just 8 points in that start, he managed a strong +7.9 impact because he hit the glass for 7 rebounds and kept the offense flowing with 3 assists instead of forcing bad looks. Unfortunately, those well-rounded performances were rare. Just days later on 12/28 vs PHX, McGowens completely collapsed with a catastrophic -17.8 impact score. He went scoreless on 0-for-5 shooting and grabbed zero rebounds, failing to offer any secondary hustle or playmaking value to compensate for his broken jumper.
Bryce McGowens spent this midseason stretch riding a frustrating seesaw between empty-calorie spot starts and invisible bench minutes. When thrust into the starting lineup on 02/20 vs MIL, he managed 10 points but dragged the team down with a miserable -6.1 Impact. That negative mark was the direct result of inefficient chucking and zero assists over 30 minutes of action, actively hurting the offensive rhythm. He briefly flipped the script in another start on 02/28 vs UTA, pouring in a high-volume 18 points to earn a stellar +8.6 Impact. That rating stemmed from his willingness to actually let it fly from deep, hitting four threes and finally providing genuine floor spacing for his teammates. Yet, the momentum vanished almost instantly on 03/01 vs LAC. Relegated back to the bench, McGowens sleepwalked through 26 minutes to post an abysmal -14.4 Impact, offering minimal defensive resistance and completely stalling the second-unit offense.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Inconsistent. McGowens has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive impact is minimal for a 21-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 51 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
42 games played