NOP

2025-26 Season

KARLO MATKOVIĆ

New Orleans Pelicans | Forward-Center | 6-10
Karlo Matković
5.7 PPG
3.7 RPG
0.8 APG
14.7 MPG
+2.1 Impact

Matković produces at an above average rate for a 15-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.1
Scoring +4.3
Points 5.7 PPG × +1.00 = +5.7
Missed 2PT 0.7/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 0.8/g × -0.87 = -0.7
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.5
Assists 0.8/g × +0.50 = +0.4
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0
Defense +0.6
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.9/g × +0.90 = +0.8
Def. Rebounds 2.8/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Contested Shots 4.7/g × +0.20 = +0.9
Deflections 1.0/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.8/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Raw Impact +7.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.3
Net Impact
+2.1
74th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 26th
6.1 PPG
Efficiency 100th
75.2% TS
Playmaking 16th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 46th
3.9 RPG
Rim Protection 86th
0.20/min
Hustle 78th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 72th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Karlo Matković’s first twenty games were defined by extreme volatility as a fringe rotation big, swinging wildly between hyper-efficient sparkplug and unplayable liability. When he embraced his role, the results were staggering. Look at his performance on 11/04 vs CHA, where elite rim-running and decisive pick-and-roll finishing yielded 13 points and a massive +10.6 impact score. He could even swing a game without looking at the basket. On 11/16 vs GSW, Matković scored just 4 points in 20 minutes but still posted a +2.4 impact score by sacrificing offensive touches to anchor the defense and provide elite rim protection. However, severe hidden costs often erased his value on off nights.

Karlo Matković spent this twenty-game stretch as a highly volatile bench piece, swinging wildly between surgical interior dominance and costly mental errors. He opened the window scorching hot during the 01/02 vs POR matchup, turning 7-of-8 shooting into 16 points and a massive +14.3 impact score. Even when his offense vanished, he still found ways to alter games through sheer hustle and rim protection. During the 01/31 vs PHI contest, he scored just 2 points but still posted a +5.3 impact by acting as an absolute terror on defense and completely shutting down the interior. Yet, that defensive discipline frequently disappeared on other nights. Despite tallying a respectable 7 points in the 02/04 vs MIL game, his overall impact sank to -1.4. Careless moving screens and a bad habit of biting on perimeter fakes completely erased the value of his interior finishing.

This stretch was defined by a masterclass in hyper-efficient, low-usage role-playing that eventually ran out of gas. Matković routinely generated massive value without demanding the basketball. On 02/28 vs UTA, he scored just 8 points but posted a stellar +8.6 impact by suffocating opponents with defensive dominance and active passing. He reached his absolute peak on 03/16 vs DAL. By stepping out to bury pick-and-pop jumpers, he completely altered the floor's geometry, yielding 13 points, 10 rebounds, and a staggering +14.4 impact score. That flawless execution eventually vanished. During a brutal outing on 03/19 vs LAC, he bricked all six of his field goal attempts. Being an absolute zero on the offensive end severely punished his team, resulting in a dismal -5.5 impact despite respectable hustle metrics.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Steady role player. Matković's impact doesn't swing much in absolute terms, and he's positive in 67% of games. You know what you're getting.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 65% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Matković consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact +1.5, second-half +2.6. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Ighodaro 28.8 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 10
K. Durant 25.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
J. Collins 23.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
Q. Post 22.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 7
J. Konchar 21.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4
I. Jackson 21.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
G. Jackson 21.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
B. Lopez 20.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Eubanks 20.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
P. Banchero 19.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Lopez 29.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 26.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
O. Ighodaro 25.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
M. Raynaud 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
D. Eubanks 21.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Collins 21.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 9
J. Hayes 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Bona 19.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 6
N. Reid 19.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 9
J. Konchar 19.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

61
Games
5.7
PPG
3.7
RPG
0.8
APG
0.4
SPG
0.9
BPG
61.0
FG%
43.7
3P%
73.2
FT%
14.7
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played