NOP

2025-26 Season

HERBERT JONES

New Orleans Pelicans | Forward | 6-7
Herbert Jones
8.9PPG
3.4RPG
2.8APG
28.4MPG
-2.7 Impact

Jones produces at an below average rate for a 28-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.7
Scoring +6.8
Points Scored 8.9 PPG = +8.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.1
Creation +0.9
Assists & Self-Creation 2.8 AST/g + self-creation = +0.9
Turnovers -3.0
Turnovers 1.3/g (live + dead blend) = -3.0
Defense +1.1
Steals 1.6/g = +3.7
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -3.1
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Rebounds 3.4 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.8
Contested Shots 3.7/g = +0.7
Deflections 3.4/g = +2.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +8.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
-2.7
34th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 47th
8.9 PPG
Efficiency 12th
48.9% TS
Playmaking 79th
2.8 APG
Rebounding 34th
3.4 RPG
Defense 99th
+15.4/g
Hustle 42th
+11.4/g
Creation 88th
+4.21/g
Shot Making 33th
+4.68/g
TO Discipline 53th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Herbert Jones opened the 2025-26 campaign trapped in a maddening offensive slump, alternating between bricking open jumpers and relying purely on sheer hustle to stay on the floor. His erratic shot selection severely handicapped his overall effectiveness, a flaw that was glaringly obvious on 11/15 vs LAL. Despite tallying 13 points in that contest, Jones posted a -2.7 Impact score because he wasted offensive possessions with an abysmal 4-for-14 shooting performance, including an ugly 1-for-8 from deep. Yet, the veteran wing still found ways to tilt the floor when his jumper abandoned him. On 11/22 vs DAL, he managed just 7 points but ground out a +4.3 Impact by crashing the glass for 9 rebounds and suffocating his matchups with relentless defensive effort. When his offensive game finally clicked, his two-way ceiling was undeniable. He peaked on 12/09 vs SAS, pairing highly efficient 6-for-10 shooting from the field with his usual defensive intensity to generate a massive +21.9 Impact score.

Herbert Jones endured a grueling offensive slump during this stretch, transforming from a reliable two-way threat into a glaring liability on the perimeter. His shooting fell off a cliff during the 01/07 vs LAL matchup, where a dismal 1-for-9 shooting night dragged his impact score down to a brutal -13.0. Poor shot selection and an inability to hit from deep completely negated his usual defensive effort. Even decent scoring nights carried hidden costs. During the 02/21 vs PHI contest, Jones tallied a respectable 14 points but still posted a -0.8 impact score because he grabbed just a single rebound in 32 minutes, failing to generate enough secondary value to swing the game. His absolute offensive rock bottom hit on 01/24 vs MEM. He went completely scoreless on three shot attempts, generating a horrific -16.9 impact as his total lack of scoring gravity crippled the half-court offense. He remained a willing defender, but you simply cannot survive as a wing in the modern NBA when you are missing this many open looks.

This grueling stretch of the season was defined by a brutal offensive slump that tested the absolute limits of Herbert Jones's two-way reputation. He occasionally found ways to survive his broken jumper. During the 03/03 vs LAL matchup, Jones managed a +1.2 Impact despite a miserable two-point, 1-for-7 shooting night. He salvaged his value entirely through gritty non-scoring hustle, grabbing six rebounds and dishing five assists to keep the offense flowing. Bizarrely, when his shot actually fell during the 03/24 vs NYK game, his underlying value vanished. Even though he scored 13 points on a highly efficient 6-for-8 from the floor and added six assists, he still posted a -1.9 Impact because of hidden defensive breakdowns that constantly bled points the other way. The wheels completely fell off shortly after, culminating in an abysmal -14.6 Impact during the 04/02 vs POR tilt where poor shot selection resulted in a 3-for-9 brickfest. When a defensive specialist starts forcing bad looks, the hidden costs will always sink their overall effectiveness.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Jones has posted negative impact in 75% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 26% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Jones consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -1.6, second-half: -3.7. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 9 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Dončić 102.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.11
PTS 11
C. Flagg 97.2 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 23
FG% 40.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.22
PTS 15
C. Spencer 59.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
B. Ingram 54.7 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
H. Barnes 45.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
T. Maxey 44.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
R. Westbrook 43.6 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
D. Fox 42.6 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Vassell 41.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Dončić 98.7 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
C. Flagg 84.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 16
K. Durant 71.8 poss
FG% 88.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 20
B. Ingram 70.7 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 6
D. Fox 62.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 7
J. Harden 57.7 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
T. Maxey 56.7 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 7
D. Booker 43.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
C. Spencer 42.7 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

56
Games
8.9
PPG
3.4
RPG
2.8
APG
1.6
SPG
0.5
BPG
38.3
FG%
30.9
3P%
80.6
FT%
28.4
MPG

GAME LOG

56 games played