March 26, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
NOP
2P —
3P —
DET
2P —
3P —
NOP
DET
NOP
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Detroit Pistons
Lethal off-ball movement and decisive shot selection stretched the opposing defense to its breaking point. He paired his perimeter scoring with surprisingly disruptive closeouts (+7.1 Def), resulting in a highly efficient two-way performance.
Hot perimeter shooting was entirely neutralized by a barrage of careless passes and defensive lapses at the point of attack. The heavy negative impact (-3.5) highlights how his inability to navigate ball screens gave back all the points he created.
Absolute dominance in the painted area powered a staggering +27.8 impact score. He overwhelmed his primary matchup with sheer physicality, finishing everything around the rim while anchoring a suffocating interior defense (+14.4 Def).
Elite wing defense (+9.7 Def) and relentless loose-ball recoveries (+4.7 Hustle) were the engines behind a highly productive outing. By staying strictly within his offensive role and taking only high-percentage looks, he maximized his two-way value.
Connective passing and steady rebounding provided a solid baseline, though missed open jumpers capped his ceiling. He managed the game well from the forward spot, using his size to disrupt passing lanes (+4.9 Def) and secure a positive overall margin.
Despite pristine shot selection and active cutting, his overall rating slipped into the negative due to foul trouble and missed rotations. He struggled to find a rhythm in transition defense, frequently allowing easy run-outs.
Driving into crowded paint areas resulted in blocked shots and empty possessions that devastated his impact score (-11.2). While he offered minor resistance on the defensive end (+2.0 Def), his lack of offensive polish was a glaring liability.
A brutal shooting slump defined by forced, early-clock jumpers completely derailed the offensive flow. His inability to stay in front of quicker guards compounded the damage, leading to a massive -11.2 overall deficit.
Crashing the offensive glass and finishing dump-off passes allowed him to carve out a solid +2.5 impact in limited action. His defensive positioning was occasionally suspect (-0.7 Def), but high-motor hustle plays (+3.1) more than compensated.
A brief scoring burst was overshadowed by a lack of physical engagement and poor defensive rebounding. Getting caught ball-watching on the perimeter allowed back-door cuts that drove his overall impact into the red.
Made the most of a garbage-time cameo by converting his only look at the basket. Kept his mistakes to a minimum to register a slightly positive rating.
Used his short stint to showcase active hands and solid positional defense (+2.1 Def). Even with a missed shot, his energy on the less glamorous end of the floor kept his impact positive.
Instantly impacted the game in a micro-stint by securing the paint and converting a quick bucket. His defensive awareness (+1.7 Def) in just two minutes highlighted a highly efficient stretch.
New Orleans Pelicans
Bully-ball tactics in the paint generated high-quality looks and a stellar +15.2 box score impact. His physical presence on the interior forced defensive collapses, while active hands in the passing lanes (+3.4 Hustle) kept the overall rating firmly positive.
Strong perimeter defense (+6.5 Def) and capable spot-up shooting were completely undermined by sloppy ball security and costly turnovers. The negative overall impact (-2.5) reflects how often his offensive mistakes fueled opponent transition opportunities.
A disastrous offensive showing defined by forced mid-range jumpers and stagnant isolation sets dragged his impact into the basement (-11.9). While he remained engaged as a point-of-attack defender (+6.8 Def), the sheer volume of empty offensive trips negated any stops he generated.
Uncharacteristically poor defensive rotations (-0.4 Def) and a tendency to get caught on screens tanked his overall value (-7.1). Even with an uptick in perimeter scoring, his inability to string together stops on the wing proved costly.
Operating strictly as a lob threat and rim protector, he provided a stable but limited interior presence. The positive defensive impact (+4.2) was driven by altering shots at the basket, though his low offensive volume capped his overall ceiling.
Playmaking flashes were overshadowed by crippling live-ball turnovers that consistently sparked opponent fast breaks. Despite active defensive hands (+3.7 Def), the erratic decision-making in half-court sets drove a negative overall rating.
Perfect shooting from beyond the arc couldn't mask the underlying issues with defensive positioning and off-ball awareness. His negative overall impact (-1.9) stems from getting targeted on switches and giving up high-value looks on the other end.
Relentless work on the glass and solid positional defense (+6.4 Def) barely kept his head above water (+0.1). The impact score was heavily suppressed by poor touch around the rim and forcing heavily contested layups in traffic.
Dropped passes and missed assignments in the pick-and-roll limited his effectiveness during a brief stint. He managed to provide some rim deterrence (+3.0 Def), but the offensive disjointedness kept him slightly in the red.
High-energy minutes as a roll man and weak-side helper translated to a robust +5.5 overall impact. He consistently beat his man down the floor (+2.9 Hustle) and altered multiple attempts at the rim to anchor the second unit.
A fleeting appearance marred by a blown defensive assignment and a rushed offensive possession. The quick negative swing (-2.6) reflects a lack of rhythm and immediate exploitation by the opposing offense.
