GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Austin Reaves 39.6m
33
pts
5
reb
8
ast
Impact
+10.3

Relentless energy on loose balls and deflections generated an elite hustle rating that perfectly complemented his offensive explosion. He dictated the pace of the game through sharp pick-and-roll navigation, punishing drop coverages with deadly accuracy. This was a complete two-way clinic that significantly elevated the entire starting unit.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 11/12 (91.7%)
Advanced
TS% 81.4%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg -0.9
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.6m
Offense +21.5
Hustle +8.7
Defense +4.0
Raw total +34.2
Avg player in 39.6m -23.9
Impact +10.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
S Luka Dončić 35.1m
34
pts
12
reb
7
ast
Impact
+14.1

Sheer offensive gravity and exceptional defensive rebounding powered a highly positive rating despite a rugged shooting night. He forced the defense into constant rotation, generating high-quality looks for teammates even when his own jumper wasn't falling. His methodical dissection of double-teams during the third quarter ultimately broke the game open.

Shooting
FG 9/22 (40.9%)
3PT 4/12 (33.3%)
FT 12/14 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 60.4%
USG% 33.7%
Net Rtg +8.9
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.1m
Offense +23.5
Hustle +4.4
Defense +7.3
Raw total +35.2
Avg player in 35.1m -21.1
Impact +14.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 64.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Rui Hachimura 33.6m
14
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.6

A severe case of tunnel vision and poor perimeter efficiency resulted in a massive negative impact. He offered virtually no playmaking or defensive resistance, allowing his matchup to dictate the tempo on the other end. The sheer volume of empty offensive possessions completely derailed the team's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -2.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Offense +9.0
Hustle +0.8
Defense -0.2
Raw total +9.6
Avg player in 33.6m -20.2
Impact -10.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Deandre Ayton 27.0m
22
pts
12
reb
1
ast
Impact
+25.0

Absolute dominance in the painted area drove a staggering net rating, fueled by elite rim protection and flawless interior finishing. He completely neutralized the opposing frontcourt, anchoring a defensive masterclass while continuing his remarkable streak of hyper-efficient shooting. His ability to seal deep in the post consistently broke the opponent's defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 7/9 (77.8%)
3PT 0/0
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.9%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +27.1
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Offense +26.2
Hustle +3.4
Defense +11.7
Raw total +41.3
Avg player in 27.0m -16.3
Impact +25.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 4
TO 0
S Gabe Vincent 24.7m
6
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.4

A noticeable uptick in perimeter efficiency couldn't rescue a surprisingly negative overall rating. He struggled to organize the half-court offense, likely bleeding value through poor spacing and stagnant ball movement. His inability to contain dribble penetration during the second quarter proved particularly costly.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +24.8
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Offense +7.0
Hustle +1.0
Defense +1.4
Raw total +9.4
Avg player in 24.7m -14.8
Impact -5.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Jake LaRavia 25.5m
10
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.1

A drastic drop in shooting efficiency severely handicapped his overall effectiveness, plunging his net rating into the negatives. While he remained engaged defensively and fought through screens, the sheer number of clanked perimeter looks stalled out multiple offensive sets. His inability to finish through contact at the rim was a glaring issue all night.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +5.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Offense +3.3
Hustle +2.7
Defense +3.3
Raw total +9.3
Avg player in 25.5m -15.4
Impact -6.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Jaxson Hayes 21.0m
8
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.3

Sustained his incredible streak of interior efficiency by capitalizing on every lob and dump-off pass that came his way. His vertical spacing warped the opposing defense, while disciplined rim contests ensured he was a net positive on the floor. He played his role to absolute perfection without forcing a single action.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.1%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg -7.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +1.4
Defense +3.2
Raw total +16.0
Avg player in 21.0m -12.7
Impact +3.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.4

Struggled to find the rhythm of the game, bleeding value through disjointed offensive possessions and sluggish defensive rotations. Though he finally broke a recent scoreless drought, his overall lack of physical presence allowed opponents to comfortably play through him. He was consistently a step slow when closing out on perimeter shooters.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Offense +1.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Raw total +2.1
Avg player in 17.4m -10.5
Impact -8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Maxi Kleber 13.2m
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

Extreme passivity on the offensive end rendered him virtually invisible, dragging his net impact down significantly. He failed to register a single field goal attempt, allowing his defender to aggressively cheat off him and clog the driving lanes. The lack of floor-stretching gravity completely defeated the purpose of his minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 3.1%
Net Rtg +44.1
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense 0.0
Raw total +2.6
Avg player in 13.2m -7.9
Impact -5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.1

Made the most of a brief cameo by flying around the court to generate positive defensive and hustle metrics. His immediate energy injection disrupted a late-game possession, proving his readiness despite the lack of touches. It was a microscopic but entirely positive shift.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -30.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +1.6
Raw total +2.9
Avg player in 2.9m -1.8
Impact +1.1
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Bryce McGowens 33.5m
23
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
-1.0

High-usage offensive creation yielded impressive counting stats, but hidden costs like transition defensive lapses kept his net impact slightly negative. He settled for too many contested mid-range jumpers during crucial second-half stretches. The scoring volume was ultimately a mirage that hid a breakeven overall performance.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 26.0%
Net Rtg -21.7
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Offense +16.3
Hustle +2.7
Defense +0.2
Raw total +19.2
Avg player in 33.5m -20.2
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Saddiq Bey 32.9m
22
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.3

Excellent shot selection and perimeter efficiency anchored a highly positive overall rating. His defensive rotations were notably sharp, adding massive value to his ledger to complement the scoring punch. This performance perfectly extended his recent streak of reliable two-way wing play.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.3%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -6.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Offense +20.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense +7.2
Raw total +29.2
Avg player in 32.9m -19.9
Impact +9.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Derik Queen 28.2m
15
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.6

Despite a noticeable scoring bump compared to his recent slump, a heavy diet of missed interior looks dragged his overall impact into the red. He generated solid hustle metrics by fighting for extra possessions, but the offensive inefficiency ultimately outweighed his effort plays. The volume simply masked a highly inefficient floor game.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 48.3%
USG% 26.6%
Net Rtg -37.9
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Offense +10.4
Hustle +2.9
Defense +1.1
Raw total +14.4
Avg player in 28.2m -17.0
Impact -2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jeremiah Fears 27.1m
21
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.1

Sustained his recent offensive tear by attacking the paint with purpose, generating a healthy positive impact score. Active hands in the passing lanes contributed to a solid defensive rating, proving he wasn't just a one-way player tonight. His ability to consistently break down the primary point-of-attack defender defined his outing.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.1%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Offense +15.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.5
Raw total +20.4
Avg player in 27.1m -16.3
Impact +4.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Yves Missi 23.9m
2
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.4

A complete lack of offensive rhythm cratered his net rating, as he failed to capitalize on his touches around the rim. While he managed to scrape together marginal defensive contributions, the empty offensive possessions severely stalled the team's momentum. He looked entirely out of sync against the opposing frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -4.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Offense -1.1
Hustle +1.4
Defense +0.7
Raw total +1.0
Avg player in 23.9m -14.4
Impact -13.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Micah Peavy 29.6m
13
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.8

Shattered his recent scoring slump with aggressive perimeter play, yet his overall impact remained inexplicably in the red. Elite hustle and defensive metrics suggest he was a menace off the ball, but hidden mistakes like live-ball turnovers or poor spacing likely sabotaged his net rating. His relentless point-of-attack pressure was the lone bright spot in an otherwise messy shift.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +0.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +3.7
Defense +5.9
Raw total +15.1
Avg player in 29.6m -17.9
Impact -2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
12
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.1

Poor perimeter shot selection and a porous defensive showing completely tanked his overall value. Opposing guards consistently targeted him in pick-and-roll actions, neutralizing any momentum gained from his increased scoring output. The heavy reliance on contested deep looks derailed the offense during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense +7.0
Hustle +0.8
Defense -1.9
Raw total +5.9
Avg player in 28.4m -17.0
Impact -11.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.8

Despite near-perfect shooting execution, his overall impact slipped into negative territory due to off-ball defensive lapses. He provided great energy on loose balls, but struggled to navigate off-ball screens when tracking shooters. A lack of overall volume limited his ability to offset those structural mistakes.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 10.2%
Net Rtg -4.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.1m
Offense +5.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.5
Raw total +10.1
Avg player in 21.1m -12.9
Impact -2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Kevon Looney 15.2m
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.8

Flawless shot selection and timely offensive execution maximized his value in limited minutes. He anchored the second unit by setting bone-crushing screens and executing perfectly on defensive rotations. This was a masterclass in low-usage, high-efficiency role-playing.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -12.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Offense +9.8
Hustle +2.6
Defense +1.5
Raw total +13.9
Avg player in 15.2m -9.1
Impact +4.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0