UTA

2025-26 Season

VINCE WILLIAMS JR.

Utah Jazz | Guard | 6-4
Vince Williams Jr.
7.5 PPG
3.9 RPG
4.2 APG
20.5 MPG
-3.3 Impact

Jr. produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.3
Scoring +3.3
Points 7.5 PPG × +1.00 = +7.5
Missed 2PT 1.7/g × -0.78 = -1.3
Missed 3PT 3.0/g × -0.87 = -2.6
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +3.4
Assists 4.2/g × +0.50 = +2.1
Off. Rebounds 1.0/g × +1.26 = +1.3
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.8/g × -1.95 = -3.5
Defense +1.0
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 2.9/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Contested Shots 2.8/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Raw Impact +6.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.5
Net Impact
-3.3
19th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
7.5 PPG
Efficiency 12th
45.8% TS
Playmaking 78th
4.2 APG
Rebounding 73th
3.9 RPG
Rim Protection 59th
0.12/min
Hustle 44th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 16th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

An erratic transition from bench sparkplug to starting lineup liability defined Vince Williams Jr.'s opening stretch of the season. His promotion to the starting unit revealed a bizarre statistical profile where high-volume playmaking was completely undermined by his scoring ineptitude. On 11/26 vs NOP, he dished out a staggering 17 assists but still posted a dismal -10.6 impact because his refusal to shoot allowed defenders to ruthlessly jump the passing lanes. Even when he aggressively hunted his own shot on 11/28 vs LAC, his 16 points came with a negative -2.2 impact as a barrage of contested misses dragged down the overall offense. Occasionally, he found ways to contribute without the ball in his hands. He managed a positive +0.5 impact on 11/24 vs DEN despite scoring just six points, generating value entirely through tenacious on-ball defensive pressure. Ultimately, you simply cannot survive as a primary initiator in this league if you cannot keep the defense honest.

A maddeningly volatile slump defined Vince Williams Jr.’s mid-season stretch, characterized by erratic shot selection and defensive lapses that frequently crippled his team's second unit. He initially looked like a premier rotational wing during the 01/06 vs SAS matchup, where hyper-efficient perimeter execution and relentless off-ball movement fueled a massive +9.4 impact score. The magic did not last. Hidden costs quickly began dragging down his overall value, even on nights when his raw box score looked passable. Take the 01/30 vs NOP contest, where a seemingly decent 13-point outing actually yielded a harmful -5.2 impact. Rather than playing within the flow of the offense, he completely bogged down the unit by repeatedly holding the ball too long against zone coverages. His utility bottomed out entirely during the 02/20 vs MEM game, resulting in a catastrophic -12.1 impact score. Clunky offensive execution and a step-slow defensive rotation made him a massive liability that night, confirming that his ball-stopping habits must be corrected if he wants to survive in a modern rotation.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Jr. has posted negative impact in 75% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 27% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Jr. consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -4.2, second-half: -2.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 45 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Fox 63.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 11
J. Fears 38.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10
J. Champagnie 28.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
K. Leonard 27.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
J. Alvarado 25.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Dunn 24.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McDaniels 23.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
R. Westbrook 23.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Edwards 21.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
M. Monk 20.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Leonard 60.4 poss
FG% 63.2%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 27
D. Fox 59.8 poss
FG% 7.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
T. Murphy III 40.8 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Durant 36.4 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.3
PTS 11
Z. Williamson 34.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 13
P. Banchero 32.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Champagnie 29.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Mitchell 29.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
J. Randle 27.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
D. Vassell 26.8 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

40
Games
7.5
PPG
3.9
RPG
4.2
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
35.3
FG%
31.1
3P%
78.0
FT%
20.5
MPG

GAME LOG

40 games played