UTA

2025-26 Season

VINCE WILLIAMS JR.

Utah Jazz | Guard | 6-4
Vince Williams Jr.
7.5PPG
3.9RPG
4.2APG
20.5MPG
-4.8 Impact

Jr. produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.8
Scoring +5.7
Points Scored 7.5 PPG = +7.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.7
Assists & Self-Creation 4.2 AST/g + self-creation = +0.7
Turnovers -4.1
Turnovers 1.8/g (live + dead blend) = -4.1
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.8
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Rebounds 3.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.1
Contested Shots 2.8/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.8/g = +1.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +5.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
-4.8
26th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 34th
7.5 PPG
Efficiency 10th
45.8% TS
Playmaking 79th
4.2 APG
Rebounding 74th
3.9 RPG
Defense 20th
+4.9/g
Hustle 77th
+11.7/g
Creation 52th
+2.88/g
Shot Making 24th
+4.78/g
TO Discipline 16th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Vince Williams Jr.'s early season was defined by a jarring shift from an erratic bench piece to a high-volume, low-impact starting facilitator. Look no further than the 11/27 vs NOP matchup, where he racked up a staggering 17 assists but posted a disastrous -12.5 Impact score. His refusal to threaten the basket—shooting just 2-for-6 from the floor—allowed defenders to completely sag off, clogging passing lanes and stalling the actual offense. Even when his shot fell, hidden costs ruined his minutes. During the 11/12 vs NYK tilt, he tallied an efficient 14 points, 9 rebounds, and 6 assists, but still managed a -0.6 Impact due to defensive lapses that routinely surrendered momentum. Conversely, he salvaged a +1.4 Impact on 11/13 vs BOS despite shooting a miserable 4-for-12 from the field, generating non-scoring value by grinding out extra rebounds and disrupting Boston's rhythm with relentless hustle. Piling up massive counting stats means absolutely nothing if the opposing defense treats you like a ghost.

A brutal shooting slump and a subsequent demotion to the bench defined this rough patch for Vince Williams Jr. Even when he managed to put up respectable point totals, the hidden costs of inefficient volume dragged him down. Take the 11/29 vs LAC matchup, where he scored 16 points but recorded a -5.0 impact score because he needed 17 shots and clanked five three-pointers just to get there. Things bottomed out completely on 12/01 vs SAC. He missed all eight of his field goal attempts in 27 minutes, suffering a catastrophic -19.0 impact score as his complete lack of scoring gravity stalled the offense. The coaching staff finally pulled him from the starting five, a move that sparked a brief, highly efficient resurgence on 01/07 vs SAS. Operating against second units, he posted a much-needed +7.3 impact score by scorching the nets for 15 points on 5-of-7 shooting while adding six rebounds and five assists.

This mid-season stretch was defined by erratic shooting and a desperate struggle to consistently generate positive value off the bench. Look at the 01/27 vs HOU matchup. Vince Williams Jr. hoisted a dismal 3-for-15 from the field. Yet, he scraped together a relatively mild -2.2 Impact score because he crashed the glass for 8 rebounds and kept the offense moving with 5 assists. Conversely, on 01/30 vs NOP, he dropped 13 points but registered a -5.1 Impact. The hidden costs of his game—poor defensive rotations and empty possession metrics—dragged down his overall value despite the double-digit scoring effort. He briefly found his rhythm on 02/02 vs MIN, drilling four three-pointers en route to 16 points and a stellar +7.1 Impact score. Unfortunately, that sharp perimeter shooting vanished almost immediately.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Jr. has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 27% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Jr. locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 45 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Fox 63.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 11
J. Fears 38.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10
J. Champagnie 28.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
K. Leonard 27.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
J. Alvarado 25.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Dunn 24.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. McDaniels 23.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
R. Westbrook 23.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Edwards 21.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
M. Monk 20.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Leonard 60.4 poss
FG% 63.2%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 27
D. Fox 59.8 poss
FG% 7.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
T. Murphy III 40.8 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Durant 36.4 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.3
PTS 11
Z. Williamson 34.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 13
P. Banchero 32.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Champagnie 29.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Mitchell 29.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
J. Randle 27.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
D. Vassell 26.8 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

40
Games
7.5
PPG
3.9
RPG
4.2
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
35.3
FG%
31.1
3P%
78.0
FT%
20.5
MPG

GAME LOG

40 games played