NOP

2025-26 Season

JORDAN POOLE

New Orleans Pelicans | Guard | 6-4
Jordan Poole
13.3 PPG
2.0 RPG
3.1 APG
24.1 MPG
-3.6 Impact

Poole produces at an below average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.6
Scoring +6.9
Points 13.3 PPG × +1.00 = +13.3
Missed 2PT 2.2/g × -0.78 = -1.7
Missed 3PT 4.9/g × -0.87 = -4.3
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +2.2
Assists 3.1/g × +0.50 = +1.6
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.7/g × -1.95 = -3.3
Defense +0.3
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.7
Contested Shots 2.9/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 1.4/g × +0.65 = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.7
Raw Impact +8.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.4
Net Impact
-3.6
13th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 68th
13.3 PPG
Efficiency 19th
48.4% TS
Playmaking 59th
3.1 APG
Rebounding 19th
2.0 RPG
Rim Protection 9th
0.07/min
Hustle 58th
0.11/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 26th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jordan Poole's first twenty games were defined by maddening volatility and a destructive addiction to erratic shot selection. Even when his jumper was falling, hidden costs routinely dragged him down, perfectly illustrated during a 30-point eruption on 10/31 vs LAC. Despite burying seven threes in that contest, his -1.7 impact score revealed how empty defensive possessions and momentum-killing mistakes completely neutralized his offensive firepower. His shot diet frequently sabotaged the offense, bottoming out on 11/04 vs CHA where he forced heavily contested jumpers on his way to an abysmal -13.9 impact. He was a walking pendulum swinging between the starting lineup and the bench. He poured in 21 points on a scorching 6-of-8 from deep on 01/11 vs ORL, yet still posted a -0.4 impact because his defensive apathy and loose ball security gave every point right back to the opponent. While brief flashes of rhythm kept his scoring totals afloat, this stretch was ultimately anchored by a player whose reckless habits hurt his team far more than his highlights helped.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Poole has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~8 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 22% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Poole locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: -1.2, second-half: -6.0. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 58 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Jones 37.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
S. Castle 36.2 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
A. Nembhard 31.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
T. Camara 30.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.52
PTS 16
A. Thompson 25.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
J. Goodwin 24.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Brown 23.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 7
J. Wells 23.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6
K. Dunn 22.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Jones 30.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
J. Champagnie 28.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
T. Camara 26.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 11
K. Dunn 24.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6
Z. Risacher 23.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 9
O. Dieng 23.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 7
K. Huerter 22.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6
J. Wells 20.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Jackson 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Sheppard 19.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

36
Games
13.3
PPG
2.0
RPG
3.1
APG
0.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
36.7
FG%
32.8
3P%
87.6
FT%
24.1
MPG

GAME LOG

36 games played