IND

2025-26 Season

KAM JONES

Indiana Pacers | Guard | 6-4
Kam Jones
4.4PPG
1.6RPG
3.2APG
16.7MPG
-7.2 Impact

Jones produces at an poor rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.2
Scoring +3.8
Points Scored 4.4 PPG = +4.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 3.2 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -2.5
Turnovers 1.0/g (live + dead blend) = -2.5
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.0/g = +0.0
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.0
Hustle & Effort +1.2
Rebounds 1.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.2
Contested Shots 1.7/g = +0.3
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.1/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +3.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
-7.2
4th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 15th
5.5 PPG
Efficiency 19th
48.8% TS
Playmaking 77th
4.1 APG
Rebounding 20th
2.0 RPG
Defense 10th
+4.4/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 19th
+1.70/g
Shot Making 18th
+4.38/g
TO Discipline 48th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Kam Jones spent the first thirteen games of the season trapped in the darkest corners of the rotation, struggling to find any rhythm during microscopic bursts of playing time. He managed to carve out a brief foothold on 12/30 vs HOU. During that contest, he logged 18 minutes and posted a -0.3 impact score, keeping the bleeding to a minimum through sheer effort despite a quiet four-point outing. But when finally handed a massive opportunity on 01/18 vs DET, his shot completely abandoned him. Despite grabbing four rebounds and dishing three assists in 29 minutes, his brutal 1-for-10 shooting from the floor dragged his impact down to a dismal -6.7. The rest of his appearances were brief and damaging, perfectly captured by a two-minute stint on 01/09 vs CHA where his failure to attempt a single shot resulted in a horrific -10.2 impact. Until he stops actively hurting his team during these fleeting trips to the hardwood, Jones will remain a pure afterthought.

This mid-season stretch was defined by a brutal identity crisis, with Kam Jones ping-ponging between the starting unit and the end of the bench while bleeding value on the floor. Look at his exhausting 39-minute start on 02/20 vs WAS. He dished out an impressive 11 assists, yet posted a catastrophic -21.8 Impact score because his horrific 2-for-9 shooting allowed defenders to completely abandon him on the perimeter. He briefly found a pulse on 02/24 vs PHI. Jones knocked down three triples on his way to 13 points and six rebounds, earning a +6.2 Impact score because his aggressive shot-making actually forced the defense to respect his gravity. Unfortunately, that confidence evaporated almost instantly. By his 03/08 vs POR appearance, he was relegated to just five minutes of empty cardio, putting up zero points and a -11.1 Impact score while completely vanishing from the offense.

A brutal shooting slump and an immediate demotion to the bench defined Kam Jones's mid-season stretch. He actually opened this twelve-game window looking like a capable starter on 03/10 vs SAC, posting an efficient 14 points and nine assists to earn a +6.2 Impact score. That illusion vanished instantly. Relegated to the second unit two nights later on 03/12 vs PHX, his jumper completely broke down during a 1-for-8 shooting nightmare that resulted in a staggering -20.9 Impact score. His inability to hit open looks routinely cratered his overall value on the floor. During a 04/09 vs BKN tilt, he managed six assists but clanked five of his seven field goal attempts, dragging his team down with a miserable -18.6 Impact mark. He only managed to stay in the green when he strictly limited his offensive aggression. On 04/07 vs MIN, Jones generated a +2.4 Impact score despite scoring just nine points, surviving purely on efficient 4-for-7 shooting and careful ball movement rather than forcing bad looks.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Jones has posted negative impact in 92% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 38% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Jones doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 21 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 48 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Cooper 26.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
I. Collier 23.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
R. Holland II 19.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
W. Clayton Jr. 18.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Knueppel 18.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
C. Payne 17.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
R. Westbrook 17.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
C. White 15.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Marshall 15.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Traore 14.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

I. Collier 41.0 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
W. Clayton Jr. 23.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Traore 21.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 5
N. Marshall 21.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 8
R. Holland II 21.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. White 20.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4
R. Westbrook 19.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 8
C. Gillespie 18.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Cooper 18.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
G. Harris 17.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

37
Games
4.4
PPG
1.6
RPG
3.2
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
40.2
FG%
29.3
3P%
50.0
FT%
16.7
MPG

GAME LOG

37 games played