IND

2025-26 Season

ETHAN THOMPSON

Indiana Pacers | Guard | 6-4
Ethan Thompson
5.7 PPG
1.9 RPG
1.5 APG
18.1 MPG
-2.9 Impact

Thompson produces at an below average rate for a 18-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.9
Scoring +2.8
Points 5.7 PPG × +1.00 = +5.7
Missed 2PT 1.1/g × -0.78 = -0.9
Missed 3PT 2.1/g × -0.87 = -1.8
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.4
Assists 1.5/g × +0.50 = +0.8
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense +0.2
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 1.4/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Contested Shots 3.5/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.2/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.4
Raw Impact +5.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.5
Net Impact
-2.9
25th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
7.5 PPG
Efficiency 31th
51.9% TS
Playmaking 32th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 33th
2.4 RPG
Rim Protection 12th
0.08/min
Hustle 75th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 80th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ethan Thompson’s first twenty games were defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between high-energy defensive cameos and disastrous offensive black holes. Sometimes, he swung momentum without ever looking at the rim. On 12/03 vs DEN, for example, Thompson logged zero points in three minutes but still posted a +2.7 impact score by relying entirely on stout defensive effort. Even when he managed to reach double figures, his erratic shot selection frequently torpedoed the offense. During a brutal -9.7 impact showing on 01/17 vs DET, Thompson scored 10 points but needed 13 shots to get there, repeatedly forcing bad perimeter looks that killed any half-court rhythm. The wheels completely fell off on 12/27 vs MIA. A horrific blend of offensive invisibility and poor defensive positioning resulted in a staggering -16.2 impact score. While he flashes brief moments of value as a disruptive defender, his tendency to hijack possessions with terrible shots makes him a glaring liability.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Thompson has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 33% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Thompson doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 33 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. Pritchard 37.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
Q. Grimes 24.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. White 23.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
J. Green 22.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
C. White 20.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6
Z. LaVine 19.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
K. Knueppel 19.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
J. Ivey 19.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
C. McCollum 18.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Simons 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. White 34.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.46
PTS 16
K. Murray 26.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
J. Green 26.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.38
PTS 10
P. Pritchard 24.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
B. Carrington 23.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 20.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Grimes 19.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
K. Knueppel 17.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 6
M. Buzelis 16.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 5
J. Hardy 16.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

27
Games
5.7
PPG
1.9
RPG
1.5
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
38.6
FG%
34.5
3P%
71.4
FT%
18.1
MPG

GAME LOG

27 games played