IND

2025-26 Season

MICAH POTTER

Indiana Pacers | Center | 6-9
Micah Potter
9.7PPG
5.0RPG
1.5APG
19.3MPG
+0.7 Impact

Potter produces at an average rate for a 19-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.7
Scoring +9.3
Points Scored 9.7 PPG = +9.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.0
Creation +0.7
Assists & Self-Creation 1.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.7
Turnovers -2.4
Turnovers 1.0/g (live + dead blend) = -2.4
Defense -0.5
Steals 0.5/g = +1.1
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.1
Rebounds 5.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.1
Contested Shots 5.7/g = +1.1
Deflections 0.7/g = +0.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.4/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +11.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
+0.7
44th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 58th
10.3 PPG
Efficiency 90th
67.0% TS
Playmaking 55th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 38th
5.2 RPG
Defense 20th
+4.1/g
Hustle 30th
+13.3/g
Creation 46th
+2.16/g
Shot Making 56th
+5.38/g
TO Discipline 39th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Micah Potter’s early 2025-26 campaign was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between a viable stretch-big and a sheer liability. When his outside shot fell, he looked like a genuine rotation piece. He stepped into the starting lineup on 01/03 vs SAS, pouring in 16 points on 4-of-8 shooting from deep to earn a +3.5 impact score. Yet, he frequently gave those gains right back through empty minutes and hidden costs. Take his outing on 01/07 vs CLE, where he managed 11 points but still posted a -2.6 impact score. His inability to grab more than two rebounds or register a single assist meant his scoring was completely offset by a lack of secondary effort. He eventually found a better balance off the bench on 01/24 vs OKC. Racking up 10 points and 10 rebounds, Potter generated a massive +9.4 impact score by dominating the glass and doing the gritty interior work rather than just hunting threes.

Micah Potter’s midseason stretch was defined by a volatile evolution from an end-of-bench afterthought into a high-variance offensive sparkplug. Given a rare starting nod on 02/10 vs NYK, he managed 10 points but posted a brutal -15.5 Impact. That dreadful score stemmed directly from reckless shot selection. He clanked his way to a 3-for-9 shooting night, bleeding value through forced perimeter looks that killed his team's offensive momentum. Relegated back to the second unit on 02/11 vs BKN, Potter immediately erupted for 19 points and 12 rebounds. He generated a staggering +24.1 Impact in that contest by abandoning the bad jumpers in favor of hyper-efficient interior finishing and relentless activity on the glass. He tapped into that same lethal efficiency on 02/24 vs PHI, pouring in 23 points on 9-for-11 shooting to post a +16.0 Impact. By cutting out the empty-calorie chucking, Potter became a genuinely dangerous weapon for the second unit.

Micah Potter’s late-season stretch was defined by a sudden promotion from end-of-bench afterthought to indispensable starting big man. He spent March struggling for consistent minutes, but a scorching shooting night on 03/29 vs MIA flipped the script. Potter poured in 21 points on 5-of-6 from beyond the arc in that contest, generating a +8.8 impact score by spacing the floor perfectly and punishing late defensive rotations. That outburst eventually earned him a starting nod on 04/05 vs CLE, where he racked up 21 points and 12 rebounds in 30 minutes. He drove a massive +19.3 impact score in that game through relentless work on the glass and highly efficient shot selection. Even when his jumper abandoned him, Potter found ways to dictate the flow of the game. During the 04/12 vs DET matchup, he bricked seven of his ten three-point attempts but still managed a +10.4 impact score by vacuuming up 11 rebounds and anchoring the interior, keeping his team afloat through sheer grit.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Potter's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 69% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Potter locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -1.4, second-half: +2.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 8 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 46 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

G. Bitadze 47.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
A. Gill 47.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
W. Carter Jr. 45.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
B. Adebayo 34.4 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 83.3%
PPP 0.44
PTS 15
I. Jackson 30.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
K. Towns 27.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
L. Kornet 26.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
M. Bagley III 25.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
T. Hendricks 23.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 6
E. Mobley 22.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

W. Carter Jr. 54.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10
G. Bitadze 50.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8
A. Gill 47.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
B. Adebayo 46.2 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
L. Kornet 43.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
K. Towns 35.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
I. Jackson 34.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
L. Garza 30.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
N. Queta 29.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
M. Bagley III 28.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

47
Games
9.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.5
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
51.5
FG%
42.3
3P%
84.2
FT%
19.3
MPG

GAME LOG

47 games played