2025-26 Season
PASCAL SIAKAM
2025-26 Season
PASCAL SIAKAM
Siakam produces at an above average rate for a 33-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 20 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Pascal Siakam's opening twenty games were defined by the extreme volatility of a heavy offensive burden, oscillating wildly between unstoppable two-way dominance and frustrating isolation slumps. When he hunted mismatches patiently, he was an absolute nightmare for opposing defenses. Look at his 11/28 vs WAS performance, where sheer mastery of the midrange and transition game fueled a massive +16.3 impact score alongside 24 points and 11 rebounds. Yet, his primary creation role sometimes carried severe hidden costs. During the 11/05 vs BKN matchup, Siakam racked up an impressive 23 points and 10 assists, but defensive miscommunications completely poisoned his minutes and dragged him to a brutal -11.6 impact rating. He also hurt the team when his aggression vanished entirely, like on 11/26 vs TOR, where a surprisingly passive offensive approach plummeted his scoring volume to a mere 11 points and generated a -3.7 impact score. To maintain consistent value, Siakam must pair his mid-post footwork with engaged weak-side rim protection rather than letting defensive lapses ruin his offensive output.
Pascal Siakam’s mid-season run was a volatile Jekyll-and-Hyde act defined by brilliant mismatch hunting heavily offset by stubborn, inefficient isolation habits. When he aggressively attacked the rim, the veteran forward was absolutely unstoppable. Look directly at 12/05 vs CHI, where he blended physical drives with lethal perimeter execution to post a massive +17.1 impact score alongside 36 points and 10 rebounds. He even found ways to anchor the lineup when his scoring volume dropped. During the 12/23 vs MIL matchup, Siakam tallied just 15 points but still generated a +4.8 impact because his high-level intangibles kept the offense humming. Yet, a maddening reliance on contested mid-range jumpers frequently dragged down his overall value despite gaudy box-score numbers. On 01/19 vs PHI, he managed to drop 24 points, but defensive lapses and high-volume inefficiency actively harmed the team, resulting in a damaging -5.8 impact score. He remains a devastating weapon, but only when he resists the urge to settle for stagnant half-court offense.
A volatile tug-of-war between dominant mismatch hunting and stubborn shot selection defined Pascal Siakam's mid-season campaign. When he committed to bullying defenders in the paint, he was entirely unguardable. He peaked on 03/23 vs ORL with a massive +19.1 impact score, driven by 37 points of overwhelming isolation mastery that completely hijacked the game flow. Yet, his insistence on settling for tough jumpers frequently sabotaged his overall value. Look no further than 03/25 vs LAL. He managed 20 points, but posted a dismal -8.4 impact because his contested mid-range isolations completely stalled the team's offense. Still, Siakam occasionally salvaged rough offensive nights through sheer effort, like on 01/26 vs ATL where he generated a +8.6 impact despite an ugly 8-for-21 shooting night by leaning heavily on his defensive gravity.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Volatile for his role. Siakam has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~6 points between games.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 66% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Siakam consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Small downward trend. First-half impact: +5.5, second-half: +2.8. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
62 games played