IND

2025-26 Season

PASCAL SIAKAM

Indiana Pacers | Forward | 6-8
Pascal Siakam
24.0PPG
6.6RPG
3.8APG
33.2MPG
+13.9 Impact

Siakam produces at an elite rate for a 33-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+13.9
Scoring +21.1
Points Scored 24.0 PPG = +24.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -7.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +5.0
Creation +1.5
Assists & Self-Creation 3.8 AST/g + self-creation = +1.5
Turnovers -5.4
Turnovers 2.2/g (live + dead blend) = -5.4
Defense +1.0
Steals 1.1/g = +2.5
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +5.1
Rebounds 6.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.9
Contested Shots 5.8/g = +1.2
Deflections 2.3/g = +1.5
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.6/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.8/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +23.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.4
Net Impact
+13.9
94th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 96th
24.0 PPG
Efficiency 47th
56.1% TS
Playmaking 90th
3.8 APG
Rebounding 85th
6.6 RPG
Defense 49th
+7.1/g
Hustle 80th
+16.5/g
Creation 79th
+3.55/g
Shot Making 90th
+9.10/g
TO Discipline 19th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Pascal Siakam opened the 2025-26 campaign operating as a relentless, two-way battering ram who bullied opponents through sheer physical force rather than finesse. He set a violent tone immediately on 10/23 vs OKC, racking up 32 points and 15 rebounds. That performance generated a monstrous Impact:+34.8 because he paired his aggressive shot creation with suffocating defensive effort and relentless work on the glass. However, his high-usage style occasionally bled value through hidden costs. Look at the 11/06 vs BKN matchup, where he posted a flashy 23 points and 10 assists but actually dragged his team down with an Impact:-3.3. That negative mark stemmed from sloppy turnovers and poor defensive transitions that gave away easy baskets the other way. Yet, the true mark of his maturity came on 11/09 vs DEN when his jumper completely abandoned him. He managed a meager 14 points on 5-for-16 shooting, but still scraped out a positive Impact:+2.0 by diving for loose balls, securing extra possessions, and grinding out crucial defensive stops.

Pascal Siakam spent the middle chunk of the season riding a volatile wave of high-usage shot creation. He oscillated wildly between an unstoppable offensive engine and an inefficient chucker. He was utterly dominant on 12/06 vs CHI, pouring in 36 points and grabbing 10 rebounds while shooting a blistering 5-for-7 from beyond the arc. His pristine shot selection and commanding presence on the glass translated to a massive +33.8 Impact score. Yet he didn't always need to light up the scoreboard to tilt the floor, as seen on 12/24 vs MIL. Despite scoring just 15 points on a mere ten shot attempts, his relentless hustle plays and suffocating defensive effort earned him a stellar +19.9 Impact score. The flip side of his aggressive mentality surfaced on 01/11 vs MIA when his jumper completely abandoned him. Forcing up heavily contested looks en route to an ugly 4-for-15 shooting night, his abysmal shot selection actively harmed the offense and resulted in a dismal -11.3 Impact score.

A blistering offensive hot streak defined Pascal Siakam's mid-season run, marked by relentless shot-hunting and heavy two-way lifting. He set the tone immediately on 01/22 vs BOS, pouring in 32 points and grabbing 10 rebounds while shooting a crisp 12-for-21 from the floor. That elite efficiency, combined with suffocating defensive effort against premier wings, fueled a massive +28.8 Impact score. He peaked again two months later on 03/23 vs ORL, launching 26 shots to rack up 37 points. Even with just a single assist to his name, his sheer scoring gravity and loose-ball hustle generated a stretch-high +29.1 Impact score. However, that extreme offensive volume occasionally backfired, most glaringly on 03/27 vs LAC. Forcing up contested jumpers led to a brutal 4-for-16 shooting night, and those wasted offensive possessions dragged his Impact score down to a dismal -14.5 despite his respectable rebounding numbers.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Siakam posts positive impact in 90% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 66% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Siakam consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +15.0, second-half: +12.7. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 20 games. Longest cold streak: 1 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Barnes 132.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 35.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 33
P. Banchero 96.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.28
PTS 27
M. Bridges 83.7 poss
FG% 68.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 29
D. Daniels 80.9 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 19
D. Barlow 63.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.22
PTS 14
H. González 61.2 poss
FG% 35.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 14
P. Watson 59.3 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.22
PTS 13
A. Wiggins 55.8 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 17
D. Jones Jr. 50.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 11
P. Williams 47.7 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Barnes 126.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 30
M. Bridges 103.7 poss
FG% 55.0%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.26
PTS 27
P. Banchero 99.2 poss
FG% 40.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 22
E. Mobley 87.7 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 9
H. González 61.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
P. Washington 59.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
C. Holmgren 58.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
Z. Williamson 55.0 poss
FG% 76.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.53
PTS 29
D. Barlow 53.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
D. Jones Jr. 51.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

62
Games
24.0
PPG
6.6
RPG
3.8
APG
1.1
SPG
0.4
BPG
48.4
FG%
35.8
3P%
69.3
FT%
33.2
MPG

GAME LOG

62 games played