NYK

2025-26 Season

JEREMY SOCHAN

New York Knicks | Forward | 6-8
Jeremy Sochan
3.6PPG
2.3RPG
0.9APG
10.0MPG
-5.2 Impact

Sochan produces at an poor rate for a 10-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.2
Scoring +3.2
Points Scored 3.6 PPG = +3.6
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -1.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.6
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 0.9 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.1
Turnovers 0.4/g (live + dead blend) = -1.1
Defense -0.2
Steals 0.4/g = +0.9
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.3
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Rebounds 2.3 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.8
Contested Shots 1.7/g = +0.3
Deflections 0.8/g = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.8/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +4.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.3
Net Impact
-5.2
14th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 16th
4.9 PPG
Efficiency 65th
58.7% TS
Playmaking 35th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 24th
3.1 RPG
Defense 49th
+7.1/g
Hustle 24th
+8.9/g
Creation 12th
+1.36/g
Shot Making 11th
+2.73/g
TO Discipline 49th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jeremy Sochan's start to the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a jarring inability to find a consistent rhythm in his new bench role. He looked brilliant out of the gate on 11/06 vs LAL, pouring in 16 points on 6-for-7 shooting to generate a stellar +8.2 Impact score. That momentum vanished instantly. Just two days later on 11/08 vs HOU, he dragged the second unit down with an abysmal -19.3 Impact score, the direct result of a 0-for-5 brickfest where he offered a mere two rebounds to compensate. Even when his shot was falling later in the month, hidden costs often ruined his overall value. Despite a highly efficient 11 points on 11/16 vs SAC, he still posted a -0.8 Impact score because defensive lapses completely erased his smooth offensive execution. When he plays within himself, he is a weapon, but forcing the issue turns him into a liability.

This stretch was defined by a drastic role reduction and near-total invisibility on the court. Sochan started the period with a pulse, logging 25 minutes and scoring 10 points on 12/06 vs CLE. He generated a +1.5 Impact score in that matchup through active rebounding and efficient inside finishing, but that brief spark immediately faded into a brutal string of empty rotations. During a ghastly six-minute stint on 12/28 vs UTA, he posted a staggering -15.6 Impact score, dragging the team down with zero points, zero rebounds, and absolutely no physical engagement. Even when his shot briefly fell, like his perfect two-for-two from deep for six points on 01/08 vs LAL, his terrible defensive rotations and failure to grab a single rebound still resulted in a -2.2 Impact score. He spent the rest of the winter buried at the end of the bench.

This grueling stretch of the season was defined by garbage-time irrelevance before a late, desperate gasp for rotation minutes. Early on, Sochan was practically invisible on the floor. He sleepwalked through an 11-minute stint on 02/22 vs CHI, where his total lack of offensive aggression and defensive apathy resulted in a disastrous -9.3 Impact score. He barely broke a sweat on 03/01 vs SAS, logging just two minutes of empty cardio while dragging his team down to a -5.0 Impact score. It took until April for his coach to finally trust him with real run again. Given 17 minutes on 04/03 vs CHI, he managed only seven points but still posted a stellar +5.6 Impact score. That high mark despite a quiet scoring night was driven entirely by his relentless hustle, as he ripped down eight rebounds and finally anchored the defense instead of floating aimlessly on the perimeter.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Sochan has posted negative impact in 86% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 58% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -6.1, second-half: -4.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 23 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Jackson Jr. 27.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
S. Aldama 27.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.33
PTS 9
J. Landale 24.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
N. Jokić 18.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
G. Bitadze 18.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
G. Yabusele 17.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Hayes 17.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
O. Okongwu 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Dončić 16.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 5
E. Mobley 16.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Jackson Jr. 40.2 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
L. Dončić 27.9 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.47
PTS 13
J. Landale 23.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
E. Mobley 19.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 8
J. Johnson 19.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
D. Booker 19.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4
N. Jokić 18.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
J. Butler III 15.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
G. Yabusele 15.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3
K. Durant 14.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

49
Games
3.6
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.9
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
51.8
FG%
25.5
3P%
70.6
FT%
10.0
MPG

GAME LOG

49 games played