CHA

2025-26 Season

KON KNUEPPEL

Charlotte Hornets | Guard-Forward | 6-6
Kon Knueppel
18.9 PPG
5.4 RPG
3.4 APG
31.5 MPG
+1.5 Impact

Knueppel produces at an above average rate for a 32-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.5
Scoring +12.7
Points 18.9 PPG × +1.00 = +18.9
Missed 2PT 2.4/g × -0.78 = -1.9
Missed 3PT 4.5/g × -0.87 = -3.9
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +3.3
Assists 3.4/g × +0.50 = +1.7
Off. Rebounds 1.3/g × +1.26 = +1.6
Turnovers -3.7
Turnovers 1.9/g × -1.95 = -3.7
Defense +1.1
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 4.0/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Contested Shots 5.3/g × +0.20 = +1.1
Deflections 1.9/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +16.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −14.8
Net Impact
+1.5
86th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 89th
18.9 PPG
Efficiency 98th
64.6% TS
Playmaking 64th
3.4 APG
Rebounding 93th
5.4 RPG
Rim Protection 32th
0.10/min
Hustle 35th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 39th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Kon Knueppel’s early season was a wildly erratic rollercoaster where flashy scoring totals frequently masked hidden on-court costs. Look no further than the 10/26 vs WAS game. Despite an efficient 20 points, his overall impact slipped into the red at -2.9 because poor transition defense and late-game turnovers completely bled away his offensive value. When his shot selection tightened, he became a terrifying weapon. He torched the nets in the 11/14 vs MIL matchup, pouring in 32 points on 12/20 shooting to drive a dominant +10.9 impact score fueled by an immense, aggressive leap from his recent baseline. Yet, his floor remains dangerously low when the jumper abandons him. During a brutal 11/26 vs NYK performance, he missed all seven of his three-point attempts, managing just 6 points while posting a disastrous -17.1 impact score that completely tanked his team's offense.

A maddening tug-of-war between blistering perimeter shooting and glaring defensive lapses defined this midseason stretch for Kon Knueppel. He looked like an offensive cheat code on 12/18 vs ATL, pouring in 28 points on 6-of-12 shooting from deep to stretch the defense and post a stellar +11.1 impact score. Yet, his scoring punch frequently carried hidden costs on the other end of the floor. During the 12/22 vs CLE matchup, Knueppel dropped 20 points on hot shooting, but his overall impact cratered to -6.0 entirely due to severe defensive breakdowns. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to dictate winning basketball without needing a heavy offensive load. On 01/10 vs UTA, he managed just 12 points but generated a massive +12.3 impact score by anchoring the lineup with suffocating perimeter defense and elite two-way efficiency. To truly elevate his game, Knueppel must realize that consistent defensive resistance matters just as much as a quick release.

This stretch was defined by extreme variance, oscillating wildly between lethal perimeter barrages and damaging, empty-calorie scoring nights. On 01/29 vs DAL, Knueppel erupted as an absolute flamethrower, burying eight triples to drop 34 points and generate a massive +18.0 impact score. Yet, scoring volume did not always translate to winning basketball, as seen on 02/05 vs HOU. Despite pouring in 24 points on an efficient 8-for-13 from the floor, his overall impact cratered to a dismal -6.6 because defensive lapses and costly mistakes completely negated his offensive production. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to salvage brutal shooting nights through sheer grit. During the 01/21 vs CLE matchup, he chucked his way to an ugly 8-for-21 mark from the field, but still posted a +7.8 impact by pulling down 11 rebounds and relying on relentless hustle to mask his inefficiency. When his shot selection tightened up, he was an offensive juggernaut, but his tendency to lapse on defense or force contested looks often dragged his team into the mud.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Knueppel's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 64% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Knueppel consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -0.2, second-half: +3.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

FG% 33.3%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.2
PTS 18
D. Wade 65.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 12
T. Maxey 62.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
C. McCollum 62.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 16
J. Brunson 58.6 poss
FG% 18.2%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
T. Johnson 54.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
D. Bane 51.7 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 15
P. Larsson 49.5 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 14
K. Kuzma 49.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
J. Tyson 48.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

FG% 23.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 8
D. Mitchell 73.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 22.2%
PPP 0.27
PTS 20
A. Green 65.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 12
D. Bane 65.0 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 19
T. Johnson 57.5 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.12
PTS 7
J. Giddey 54.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 13
N. Powell 50.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 16
V. Edgecombe 49.6 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
M. Buzelis 48.7 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 13
I. Quickley 46.3 poss
FG% 57.9%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.54
PTS 25

SEASON STATS

76
Games
18.9
PPG
5.4
RPG
3.4
APG
0.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
48.5
FG%
43.4
3P%
86.8
FT%
31.5
MPG

GAME LOG

76 games played