2025-26 Season
JOCK LANDALE
2025-26 Season
JOCK LANDALE
Landale produces at an above average rate for a 22-minute workload.
Landale produces at an above average rate for a 22-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 16 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Jock Landale’s opening stretch was defined by a mid-November demotion to the bench that transformed him into a wildly volatile offensive sparkplug. Before the lineup change, he occasionally thrived through pure shooting efficiency. He posted a +14.0 Impact on 10/27 vs GSW by hitting all six of his field goals for 17 flawless points. The move to the second unit unlocked his aggression, peaking on 11/25 vs DEN when he poured in 26 points and grabbed 10 rebounds to generate a massive +19.1 Impact. However, that same aggressive mindset frequently sabotaged his overall value. On 11/27 vs NOP, Landale managed 11 points, but his erratic shot selection—chucking 11 attempts in just 18 minutes—resulted in a dismal -7.3 Impact. When he plays within the flow of the offense, he is highly effective, but forcing his own shots completely erases his worth on the floor.
This midseason stretch was defined by Jock Landale's erratic but highly rewarding transition from backup center to frequent starter. When his perimeter touch was dialed in, he was an absolute wrecking ball, erupting for 26 points, 11 rebounds, and five assists during the 02/05 vs UTA matchup. His blistering 5-for-8 shooting from deep in that contest stretched the floor beautifully, driving a massive +25.2 Impact score. However, when the jumper abandoned him, his presence actively choked the team's offensive flow. Look no further than the 01/08 vs PHX tilt, where he bricked all five of his field goal attempts and posted a dismal -8.1 Impact score because his poor spacing allowed defenders to freely pack the paint. Yet, he could still salvage his minutes on low-scoring nights through sheer grit. During the 12/16 vs LAC game, Landale managed just eight points but still generated a +5.5 Impact score by leveraging stout defensive positioning and timely hustle plays to create extra possessions.
Jock Landale's late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between highly efficient bursts and completely invisible shifts off the bench. When his touch vanished, he became an active detriment to the second unit. Look no further than his disastrous outing on 03/10 vs DAL, where a brutal 0-for-5 shooting night and a total lack of offensive production resulted in a staggering -14.6 impact score. Even when he managed double-digit scoring, hidden costs often dragged him down. On 03/23 vs MEM, his 11 points were entirely neutralized by poor perimeter execution—he bricked three of his four attempts from deep—leaving him with a -3.7 impact. Yet, a sudden promotion to the starting lineup unlocked his absolute best basketball. Given 34 minutes on 03/28 vs SAC, Landale erupted for 19 points and 13 rebounds, dominating the glass to post a massive +16.7 impact score.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Boom-or-bust player. Landale's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 59% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Landale locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
68 games played
