IND

2025-26 Season

TAELON PETER

Indiana Pacers | Guard | 6-3
Taelon Peter
4.5PPG
1.6RPG
1.1APG
13.0MPG
-6.1 Impact

Peter produces at an poor rate for a 13-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.1
Scoring +3.8
Points Scored 4.5 PPG = +4.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 1.1 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.7/g (live + dead blend) = -1.8
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +0.9
Rebounds 1.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.3
Contested Shots 1.9/g = +0.4
Deflections 0.8/g = +0.5
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.0/g = +0.0
Raw Impact +3.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.8
Net Impact
-6.1
13th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
6.6 PPG
Efficiency 51th
54.7% TS
Playmaking 23th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 25th
2.2 RPG
Defense 47th
+7.1/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 14th
+1.56/g
Shot Making 23th
+4.69/g
TO Discipline 56th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Taelon Peter's first thirteen games of the 2025-26 season were defined by a desperate struggle to survive at the end of the bench. On 11/16 vs TOR, he managed a stretch-high five points and four assists, but his abysmal 1-for-6 shooting from beyond the arc cratered his impact score to a brutal -9.1. Empty minutes kill teams. This harsh reality hit hard on 11/10 vs GSW, where he bricked all three of his field goal attempts in just six minutes to earn a dismal -11.8 impact rating. Things hit rock bottom during a brief five-minute stint on 12/02 vs CLE, as a nearly blank stat line—yielding just one point and zero rebounds or assists—resulted in a catastrophic -12.2 impact score. Unless he stops forcing terrible shots and starts contributing without the ball, Peter will remain a complete liability for his coaching staff.

Taelon Peter’s mid-season stretch was defined by a jarring transition from garbage-time irrelevance to hollow, high-minute rotation filler. Early on, he was glued to the bench, posting a disastrous -12.9 Impact score on 12/04 vs DEN after bricking both his shots and looking completely lost in a mere three minutes of action. As rotation changes forced him into heavier minutes by February, his raw production spiked, but the underlying value remained incredibly poor. He poured in a stretch-high 16 points on 02/19 vs WAS, yet dragged the team down with a -0.9 Impact because his offense was entirely one-dimensional. By hoisting 11 three-pointers out of 12 total shots that night, he settled for outside chucking instead of pressuring the rim. He did manage one complete performance on 02/11 vs BKN. In that rare bright spot, Peter scored 14 points and dished three assists, earning a stellar +7.6 Impact by finally blending his perimeter volume with active rebounding and connective passing.

Taelon Peter's late-season stretch was defined by a brutal slump where his erratic shot selection and lack of peripheral stats constantly dragged down his team. During the 03/01 vs MEM matchup, he managed a stretch-high 11 points, but his abysmal 4-for-13 shooting and failure to grab more than a single rebound in 36 minutes yielded a harsh -6.2 Impact. Chucking contested jumpers rarely translates to winning basketball. Even when his shot briefly fell during a highly efficient 9-point outing on 03/15 vs MIL, his complete invisibility elsewhere—posting zero rebounds and zero assists—resulted in a -5.0 Impact. He finally found a way to contribute without dominating the ball on 04/07 vs MIN. Though he scored just 5 points in that contest, his 4 rebounds and timely passing earned him a +1.1 Impact, marking his only positive outing of the entire twelve-game run. If Peter wants to stay in the rotation, he must realize that hollow scoring means nothing without the gritty plays that actually affect winning.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Peter has posted negative impact in 92% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 27% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Peter doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -8.4, second-half: -3.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 19 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 44 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Cooper 31.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
E. Dëmin 23.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
A. Williams 21.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
K. Richmond 20.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Collier 16.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Mitchell 15.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Spencer 13.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
G. Dick 13.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 5
T. Johnson 13.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. White 12.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Cooper 43.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
E. Dëmin 25.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Williams 18.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 6
C. Williams 17.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
K. Richmond 16.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 5
B. Sensabaugh 16.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 4
J. Wilson 15.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
A. Mitchell 14.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
W. Riley 14.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.5
PTS 7
J. Goodwin 14.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

38
Games
4.5
PPG
1.6
RPG
1.1
APG
0.7
SPG
0.1
BPG
38.0
FG%
32.8
3P%
62.5
FT%
13.0
MPG

GAME LOG

38 games played