IND

2025-26 Season

QUENTON JACKSON

Indiana Pacers | Guard | 6-4
Quenton Jackson
9.1PPG
2.3RPG
2.9APG
18.3MPG
-2.3 Impact

Jackson produces at an below average rate for a 18-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.3
Scoring +8.0
Points Scored 9.1 PPG = +9.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +1.0
Assists & Self-Creation 2.9 AST/g + self-creation = +1.0
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.3/g (live + dead blend) = -2.8
Defense +0.1
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.4
Hustle & Effort +1.8
Rebounds 2.3 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.2
Contested Shots 1.8/g = +0.4
Deflections 1.4/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +8.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
-2.3
47th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 51th
9.5 PPG
Efficiency 59th
55.4% TS
Playmaking 58th
3.0 APG
Rebounding 38th
2.5 RPG
Defense 30th
+5.5/g
Hustle 34th
+7.6/g
Creation 50th
+2.79/g
Shot Making 39th
+5.85/g
TO Discipline 30th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Quenton Jackson's early season was defined by a spectacular, fleeting eruption that quickly dissolved into a brutal multi-month slump. He briefly looked like a legitimate offensive engine on 11/01 vs GSW, pouring in 25 points and 10 assists on blazing 10-for-16 shooting to generate a massive +30.2 Impact score. That elite metric stemmed directly from his flawless playmaking and aggressive, highly efficient shot selection. In those early weeks, he even provided value when his scoring was quiet; on 10/30 vs DAL, he tallied just eight points but earned a +2.5 Impact score by offering gritty defensive effort and taking smart, high-percentage shots. Unfortunately, the magic vanished almost instantly as he bounced erratically between the starting lineup and the end of the bench. By 12/28 vs MIA, his confidence had completely evaporated. He managed just four points and zero rebounds in 14 minutes, resulting in a disastrous -15.1 Impact score because his total inability to secure the glass or pressure the rim dragged down every unit he joined. He simply could not find a way to positively influence basketball games once his scoring touch abandoned him.

Quenton Jackson’s mid-season stretch was defined by pure, unadulterated volatility, oscillating wildly between explosive bench scoring and complete duds. When he caught fire, he was unstoppable, best seen on 02/03 vs UTA when he poured in 24 points on near-perfect 9-for-10 shooting. His massive +19.2 Impact score that night stemmed directly from flawless shot selection and ruthless efficiency in just 17 minutes of action. However, thrusting him into a larger role often backfired spectacularly. Handed a rare start on 01/18 vs DET, Jackson forced terrible looks to finish 3-for-10 from the field, dragging his team down with a brutal -9.4 Impact score. Even when he generated decent offensive numbers, hidden costs frequently ruined his overall value. During the 02/22 vs DAL matchup, he managed 11 points and 6 assists, but his -3.6 Impact score revealed a player bleeding points on the defensive end. He remains a tantalizing but unpredictable spark plug who can win you a quarter just as quickly as he shoots you out of a game.

Quenton Jackson's late-season stretch was defined by a turbulent transition into the starting lineup that eventually yielded confident playmaking. Coming off the bench early on, his shot selection was entirely erratic. This resulted in a brutal -10.3 Impact during a dismal 1-for-8 shooting night on 03/10 vs SAC. Even when he began producing higher scoring totals as a starter, hidden costs often dragged down his actual value. Look at his performance on 04/09 vs BKN, where he tallied 12 points and 7 assists but still posted a -6.4 Impact because he surrendered easy blow-bys on defense and stalled the offense with poorly timed turnovers. He finally put the whole package together on 04/12 vs DET. Jackson poured in 21 points and dished out 8 assists in that contest, generating a stellar +11.4 Impact by balancing aggressive rim attacks with sharp distribution.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Jackson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Jackson doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 50 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Brunson 48.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11
D. White 38.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
R. Rollins 34.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Maxey 33.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
D. Garland 32.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
T. Herro 29.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 25.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
V. Edgecombe 24.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Simons 23.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
L. Ball 22.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Mitchell 51.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
L. Ball 39.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.41
PTS 16
S. Curry 38.9 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
D. Garland 37.8 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
R. Rollins 37.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
M. Bridges 36.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Edgecombe 33.1 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
L. Shamet 29.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
D. White 28.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 9
J. Alvarado 25.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

49
Games
9.1
PPG
2.3
RPG
2.9
APG
0.6
SPG
0.1
BPG
47.0
FG%
35.6
3P%
82.4
FT%
18.3
MPG

GAME LOG

49 games played