IND

2025-26 Season

AARON NESMITH

Indiana Pacers | Guard-Forward | 6-5
Aaron Nesmith
13.8PPG
4.2RPG
1.9APG
29.6MPG
+1.5 Impact

Nesmith produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.5
Scoring +11.8
Points Scored 13.8 PPG = +13.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -5.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.3
Creation +0.6
Assists & Self-Creation 1.9 AST/g + self-creation = +0.6
Turnovers -3.4
Turnovers 1.4/g (live + dead blend) = -3.4
Defense -0.8
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.7
Hustle & Effort +3.3
Rebounds 4.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.7
Contested Shots 5.4/g = +1.1
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.6/g = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.6/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +11.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
+1.5
67th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 72th
13.8 PPG
Efficiency 56th
55.2% TS
Playmaking 31th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 80th
4.2 RPG
Defense 35th
+6.1/g
Hustle 87th
+14.0/g
Creation 51th
+2.85/g
Shot Making 64th
+7.55/g
TO Discipline 65th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Aaron Nesmith’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by violent, unpredictable pendulum swings in his shooting efficiency. When his jumper abandoned him, the results were disastrous. This was painfully obvious during the 10/30 vs DAL matchup, where a ghastly 2-for-16 shooting night cratered his impact score to a dismal -14.1. Conversely, when he found his rhythm, he was an absolute flamethrower. On 11/09 vs DEN, Nesmith erupted for 25 points on a hyper-efficient 7-of-10 from the floor, generating a massive +26.4 impact score by punishing sluggish defensive rotations. Yet, his value wasn't always strictly tethered to his scoring output. On 12/31 vs ORL, he managed a mere 9 points on brutal 3-of-11 shooting, but still posted a robust +11.4 impact. He salvaged that ugly offensive night entirely through sheer grit, crashing the glass for 10 crucial rebounds to create extra possessions and keep his team afloat.

Aaron Nesmith’s mid-season stretch was defined by a terrifying offensive cratering that temporarily derailed his two-way value. The absolute bottom fell out on 01/15 vs TOR. He suffered a ghastly 1-for-12 shooting night, including eight missed threes, which resulted in a team-sinking -12.1 Impact score. Forcing terrible shots actively sabotaged the offense when his jumper vanished. Yet, Nesmith can still tilt a game without filling up the scoring column. Look at 01/11 vs MIA, where he managed just 12 points but still posted a stellar +7.5 Impact score by grabbing nine rebounds and relentlessly defending the perimeter. He eventually snapped out of the funk on 01/31 vs ATL, pouring in 23 points on blistering 8-of-10 shooting to earn a +6.8 Impact score. When Nesmith plays within himself, he is a vital asset, but his stubbornness during cold snaps carries a steep cost.

Aaron Nesmith's midseason stretch was defined by wild, unpredictable swings between offensive invisibility and sudden scoring explosions. He spent late February and early March mired in a brutal shooting slump, bottoming out completely on 03/04 vs LAC. Missing seven of his eight shots and offering virtually no playmaking, he was a massive liability on the floor with a dismal -14.0 Impact score. Then, he suddenly flipped a switch. He caught absolute fire on 03/15 vs MIL, pouring in a blistering 32 points on 10-of-14 shooting with seven made threes. That elite shot-making and pure scoring gravity fueled a massive +20.1 Impact score. Yet, even when his point totals looked respectable later in the month, his underlying value occasionally cratered, like on 03/25 vs LAL. Despite scoring a solid 14 points, his erratic 2-for-8 shooting from deep and empty peripheral stats actively hurt the team, resulting in a poor -9.6 Impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Nesmith's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 45% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Nesmith locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +2.8, second-half: +0.2. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Bane 69.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 9
M. Bridges 58.7 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 16
L. Shamet 52.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
A. Green 45.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 13
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
J. Johnson 40.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
D. White 38.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
L. Dončić 38.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
K. Leonard 36.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
T. da Silva 34.3 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Leonard 66.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 29
FG% 46.7%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.31
PTS 19
J. Johnson 55.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 17
J. Brunson 51.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.35
PTS 18
D. White 49.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 13
L. Dončić 49.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.37
PTS 18
M. Bridges 48.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11
A. Green 45.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
A. Black 41.0 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
L. Shamet 40.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

46
Games
13.8
PPG
4.2
RPG
1.9
APG
0.6
SPG
0.5
BPG
41.7
FG%
38.1
3P%
80.9
FT%
29.6
MPG

GAME LOG

46 games played