DAL

2025-26 Season

P.J. WASHINGTON

Dallas Mavericks | Forward | 6-7
P.J. Washington
14.1 PPG
7.1 RPG
1.8 APG
31.0 MPG
-0.2 Impact

Washington produces at an average rate for a 31-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.2
Scoring +7.8
Points 14.1 PPG × +1.00 = +14.1
Missed 2PT 3.7/g × -0.78 = -2.9
Missed 3PT 2.8/g × -0.87 = -2.4
Missed FT 1.0/g × -1.00 = -1.0
Creation +3.2
Assists 1.8/g × +0.50 = +0.9
Off. Rebounds 1.8/g × +1.26 = +2.3
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.7/g × -1.95 = -3.3
Defense +3.0
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 1.1/g × +0.90 = +1.0
Def. Rebounds 5.3/g × +0.30 = +1.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.1
Contested Shots 6.7/g × +0.20 = +1.3
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.7/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +13.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −14.0
Net Impact
-0.2
48th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 75th
14.1 PPG
Efficiency 24th
52.4% TS
Playmaking 55th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 91th
7.1 RPG
Rim Protection 84th
0.19/min
Hustle 44th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 33th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

P.J. Washington’s opening stretch of the season was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between two-way dominance and actively harmful offensive decision-making. Look no further than 11/16 vs POR, where he poured in 21 points but still registered a -1.7 impact score because a disastrous string of live-ball turnovers completely sabotaged his hot shooting night. Conversely, he dominated without volume scoring on 11/12 vs PHX. Despite tallying just 6 points in five minutes of action, he generated a massive +6.0 impact by ruthlessly attacking mismatches in the post to tilt the floor. Bad habits still linger. His shot selection bottomed out during a brutal perimeter slump on 11/01 vs DET, where he posted an abysmal -14.8 impact score by forcing up bad shots and missing all six of his three-point attempts. When Washington leverages his physical tools to pressure the rim, he is a dynamic weapon, but his tendency to settle for contested jumpers makes him a highly volatile asset.

Maddening inconsistency defined this mid-season stretch for P.J. Washington, as a volatile tug-of-war between defensive brilliance and offensive passivity dictated his nightly value. When he engaged on the less glamorous end of the floor, his worth skyrocketed. Look no further than 01/22 vs GSW. Despite scoring a modest 10 points, he generated a massive +9.4 impact score by anchoring a stellar defensive rating and relentlessly disrupting passing lanes. Conversely, empty-calorie volume frequently dragged his numbers into the red. During the 01/28 vs MIN matchup, Washington poured in 21 points but still registered a -2.4 impact because his interior production was entirely offset by a disastrous 0-for-4 showing from beyond the arc. He finally found the right offensive balance on 02/22 vs IND, tallying 23 points and a robust +7.5 impact score by attacking the rim aggressively instead of settling for outside jumpers.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Washington's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Washington consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 60 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Avdija 78.5 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
J. Randle 69.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10
N. Reid 66.8 poss
FG% 9.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
S. Bey 65.7 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
J. Johnson 62.4 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
Z. Williamson 60.2 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 14
P. Siakam 59.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
R. Hachimura 56.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
K. Durant 54.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 9
R. Barrett 51.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Durant 94.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 30
L. James 87.0 poss
FG% 52.6%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 22
Z. Williamson 75.8 poss
FG% 76.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 20
J. Randle 73.4 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 11
D. Avdija 63.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
J. Johnson 57.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
N. Reid 57.2 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.33
PTS 19
S. Bey 53.7 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
L. Markkanen 52.2 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 17
S. Barnes 46.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

55
Games
14.1
PPG
7.1
RPG
1.8
APG
1.0
SPG
1.1
BPG
44.8
FG%
32.0
3P%
68.7
FT%
31.0
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played