GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BOS Boston Celtics
S Jaylen Brown 33.3m
24
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+8.6

Paced the offense with decisive downhill attacks, consistently beating his primary defender off the dribble to compromise the shell. His physical on-ball defense against opposing wings disrupted their timing and forced multiple rushed attempts. A sustained barrage of mid-range execution in the second half broke the opponent's defensive spirit.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 26.8%
Net Rtg +29.1
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Offense +17.4
Hustle +3.5
Defense +6.5
Raw total +27.4
Avg player in 33.3m -18.8
Impact +8.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Derrick White 31.1m
20
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+16.9

A flawless two-way performance driven by elite screen navigation and perfectly timed help defense. Generated massive momentum swings with chase-down blocks and deflections that ignited the transition game. His pristine decision-making as a secondary creator ensured the offense hummed at peak efficiency.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +31.3
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Offense +17.0
Hustle +8.3
Defense +8.9
Raw total +34.2
Avg player in 31.1m -17.3
Impact +16.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 29.4%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
S Jayson Tatum 27.2m
15
pts
12
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.3

Overcame a sluggish shooting night by leaning heavily into his playmaking and rebounding duties to control the game's flow. His impact stayed positive thanks to excellent weak-side rim protection and timely double-teams that forced late-clock turnovers. A crucial stretch of defensive stops in the third quarter offset his struggles finishing in traffic.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.9%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +32.3
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Offense +7.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense +7.6
Raw total +17.6
Avg player in 27.2m -15.3
Impact +2.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Neemias Queta 25.6m
16
pts
15
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.1

Utterly dominated the painted area through sheer physicality and relentless offensive rebounding. His ability to seal defenders early in the shot clock created high-percentage looks and completely warped the opponent's interior defense. A masterclass in vertical spacing and rim protection that dictated the terms of the game.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +25.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Offense +14.5
Hustle +4.5
Defense +9.5
Raw total +28.5
Avg player in 25.6m -14.4
Impact +14.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Sam Hauser 22.5m
6
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.0

Cold perimeter shooting stalled the half-court offense, as he repeatedly clanked wide-open looks generated by drive-and-kicks. Despite solid positional defense and active closeouts, his inability to punish the defense allowed them to aggressively help off him. The missed opportunities from deep completely negated his hard work on the defensive end.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Offense +2.3
Hustle +2.0
Defense +4.4
Raw total +8.7
Avg player in 22.5m -12.7
Impact -4.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
18
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+2.0

Kept the scoreboard moving with relentless pace, though poor shot selection from beyond the arc capped his overall effectiveness. His peskiness navigating screens on defense added value, but he gave some points back by over-helping on the strong side. A mixed bag where his high-energy drives were slightly offset by forced perimeter jumpers early in the clock.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 52.9%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +25.3
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Offense +14.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +4.7
Raw total +21.0
Avg player in 33.8m -19.0
Impact +2.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.4

Showed excellent spatial awareness and connective passing, but defensive limitations on switches kept his impact near neutral. Hustled hard for loose balls to extend possessions, yet struggled to stay in front of quicker guards on the perimeter. A solid glue-guy shift that was slightly undermined by late-game matchup exploitation.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg -3.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Offense +5.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.3
Raw total +11.3
Avg player in 20.8m -11.7
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.4

Knocked down his perimeter looks but hemorrhaged value through poor rotational awareness on the defensive end. Frequently got caught ball-watching, which surrendered wide-open corner threes to his assignment. The efficient shooting was entirely overshadowed by the defensive breakdowns he caused in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +2.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.9m
Offense +5.6
Hustle +1.1
Defense +0.6
Raw total +7.3
Avg player in 18.9m -10.7
Impact -3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Luka Garza 17.9m
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.0

Punished switches in the post with excellent footwork and soft touch around the basket. Survived defensively by executing drop coverage perfectly, forcing contested mid-range jumpers instead of yielding layups. His ability to consistently win the positioning battle on the block anchored a highly effective bench unit.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.9m
Offense +9.7
Hustle +1.4
Defense +3.0
Raw total +14.1
Avg player in 17.9m -10.1
Impact +4.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

Forced the issue offensively during a brief stint, resulting in wild attempts that sparked opponent fast breaks. Brought decent energy to the defensive glass, but his lack of offensive rhythm completely stalled the unit's momentum. Needs to let the game come to him rather than short-circuiting possessions with rushed decisions.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Offense -1.8
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.7
Raw total +0.4
Avg player in 4.3m -2.4
Impact -2.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

Looked lost during his brief run, failing to execute offensive sets or make an impact on the glass. Was easily sealed off by opposing bigs, compromising the team's interior defense. A completely invisible shift that forced a quick substitution to stop the bleeding.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 2.7m -1.5
Impact -1.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

Made virtually no imprint on the game during a fleeting appearance at the end of a quarter. Was a step slow recovering in pick-and-roll coverage, giving up a quick floater before being subbed out. Essentially a cardio session with zero statistical or tactical footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.2
Avg player in 1.8m -1.0
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Cooper Flagg 30.1m
16
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
-9.6

High-volume inefficiency severely damaged his overall impact, as he repeatedly forced contested drives into heavy traffic. While his weak-side defensive activity provided a slight buffer, the sheer number of empty offensive trips allowed the opponent to dictate the tempo. A rough third-quarter stretch of forced mid-range pull-ups epitomized his struggles to read the defense.

Shooting
FG 7/23 (30.4%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 33.5%
USG% 37.5%
Net Rtg -22.4
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Offense +0.8
Hustle +3.5
Defense +2.9
Raw total +7.2
Avg player in 30.1m -16.8
Impact -9.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S P.J. Washington 28.8m
5
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.9

Excellent weak-side rim protection and active rotations kept his defensive metrics afloat, but his offensive rhythm completely vanished. Settled for heavily contested looks early in the shot clock, stalling the half-court offense and killing momentum. The stark drop-off in scoring punch left a noticeable void in the second unit's floor spacing.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.8%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Offense +1.7
Hustle +2.9
Defense +6.7
Raw total +11.3
Avg player in 28.8m -16.2
Impact -4.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Max Christie 28.8m
12
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.5

Perimeter shot-making provided a strong baseline, but his overall rating cratered due to severe issues with ball security and defensive fouling. Repeatedly getting caught out of position on closeouts negated the value of his spot-up triples. The scoring efficiency masked how much he gave back during chaotic transition sequences where he failed to match up.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg -29.7
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Offense +5.2
Hustle +0.8
Defense +1.6
Raw total +7.6
Avg player in 28.8m -16.1
Impact -8.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Khris Middleton 24.3m
7
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.8

Impact plummeted due to forced isolation jumpers against tight perimeter defense that resulted in empty possessions. His inability to create separation led to disrupted timing and sloppy ball-handling that fed opponent transition attacks. Continues a troubling pattern of offensive stagnation and poor shot selection over the last two weeks.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 35.9%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg -29.7
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Offense +2.6
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +2.8
Avg player in 24.3m -13.6
Impact -10.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Dwight Powell 15.4m
2
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.7

Completely neutralized as a roll man, failing to register a single shot attempt while being pushed off his spots by physical interior defense. Though he set decent screens, his lack of scoring gravity allowed defenders to aggressively trap the ball-handler. The negative overall impact reflects how his offensive invisibility cramped the floor during his shift.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -29.4
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Offense +1.2
Hustle +1.4
Defense +0.3
Raw total +2.9
Avg player in 15.4m -8.6
Impact -5.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Moussa Cisse 25.5m
6
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.8

Completely anchored the interior with elite rim deterrence and relentless energy on the offensive glass. His ability to blow up pick-and-roll actions at the point of attack fueled a massive positive swing when he was on the floor. A dominant second-quarter stint of altered shots and second-chance creation defined this stellar outing.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +20.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Offense +10.2
Hustle +5.8
Defense +11.2
Raw total +27.2
Avg player in 25.5m -14.4
Impact +12.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
13
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.8

Defensive lapses and poor screen navigation allowed his matchups to consistently find open driving lanes, destroying his overall rating. Even with a solid rhythm on his floaters, the inability to contain dribble penetration proved too costly. Gave up crucial back-door cuts during the opponent's decisive run that erased his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -36.4
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +9.1
Hustle +1.1
Defense -1.9
Raw total +8.3
Avg player in 25.1m -14.1
Impact -5.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+3.7

Made up for streaky finishing by applying relentless rim pressure and consistently collapsing the defense to create for others. His aggressive point-of-attack defense disrupted opposing guards, generating valuable transition opportunities. A key sequence of back-to-back hustle plays in the fourth quarter cemented his positive two-way contribution.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg -12.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Offense +7.8
Hustle +4.0
Defense +2.7
Raw total +14.5
Avg player in 19.2m -10.8
Impact +3.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
19
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.5

Elite off-ball movement and lethal catch-and-shoot execution punished defensive miscommunications all night. Broke out of a recent slump by perfectly reading top-locked defenders and relocating for open looks in transition. His perimeter gravity opened up the paint for everyone else, driving a highly efficient offensive stint.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 73.1%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -18.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Offense +14.3
Hustle +1.1
Defense +0.3
Raw total +15.7
Avg player in 18.0m -10.2
Impact +5.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Caleb Martin 16.2m
4
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.6

Struggled to find a rhythm in limited action, with his negative impact stemming from missed rotations on the perimeter. Failed to generate his usual disruptive deflections, allowing the opposing offense to run their sets without friction. A quiet shift that lacked the energetic defensive spark he usually provides off the bench.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg +6.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Offense +2.4
Hustle +1.1
Defense +1.1
Raw total +4.6
Avg player in 16.2m -9.2
Impact -4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
AJ Johnson 4.3m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.7

Barely registered an impact during a brief stint, looking hesitant to initiate the offense and deferring too quickly. Got targeted on a pair of defensive switches that led to easy scores at the rim. Needs to show more aggression to avoid being a zero-impact placeholder on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +39.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.3
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 4.3m -2.4
Impact -1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.9

Provided a quick, efficient scoring punch in a very short window by decisively attacking closeouts. Kept the ball moving well against zone looks, ensuring the offense didn't stagnate during his minutes. A brief but highly effective burst of competent floor generalship.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 37.5%
Net Rtg +39.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Offense +4.1
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +4.3
Avg player in 4.3m -2.4
Impact +1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0