DAL

2025-26 Season

ANTHONY DAVIS

Dallas Mavericks | Forward-Center | 6-10
Anthony Davis
20.4PPG
11.1RPG
2.8APG
31.3MPG
+16.1 Impact

Davis produces at an elite rate for a 31-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+16.1
Scoring +17.4
Points Scored 20.4 PPG = +20.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.6
Creation +1.5
Assists & Self-Creation 2.8 AST/g + self-creation = +1.5
Turnovers -4.8
Turnovers 2.0/g (live + dead blend) = -4.8
Defense +1.0
Steals 1.1/g = +2.5
Blocks 1.6/g = +1.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.9
Hustle & Effort +11.6
Rebounds 11.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +6.9
Contested Shots 9.7/g = +1.9
Deflections 2.4/g = +1.6
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 2.7/g = +0.8
Raw Impact +26.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.6
Net Impact
+16.1
97th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 91th
20.4 PPG
Efficiency 29th
52.9% TS
Playmaking 80th
2.8 APG
Rebounding 99th
11.1 RPG
Defense 37th
+6.5/g
Hustle 93th
+20.6/g
Creation 69th
+3.07/g
Shot Making 66th
+6.98/g
TO Discipline 21th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Anthony Davis opened the 2025-26 campaign riding a wave of relentless two-way dominance before an abrupt hiatus derailed his rhythm. That early momentum hit a brick wall on 10/30 vs IND. An early exit limited him to a truncated seven-minute appearance, and the resulting four-point dud dragged his nightly influence down to a -2.9 Impact. He finally returned to action a month later on 11/29 vs LAL, managing a highly subdued 12 points. Despite that low scoring output, Davis salvaged a positive +5.0 Impact by acting as a willing connector with five assists and dialing up his defensive effort. He completely removed the training wheels just three days later. On 12/02 vs DEN, the big man bullied his way to 32 points and 13 rebounds on crisp 13-for-23 shooting. Because he paired that elite shot selection with terrifying rim protection, his overall value skyrocketed to a staggering +38.4 Impact.

This seven-game stretch was defined by a rapid, violent course correction after a sudden offensive power outage. The low point arrived on 12/06 vs OKC, where Davis looked completely out of rhythm, shooting a dismal 1-for-9 to finish with just 2 points and a glaring -11.2 Impact score. He immediately flipped the script the very next night on 12/07 vs HOU. By hunting high-percentage looks around the rim instead of settling, he poured in 29 points on 14-of-19 shooting to generate a massive +32.2 Impact score. Crucially, even when his scoring volume dipped later in the run, Davis found ways to tilt the floor through sheer physical effort. Take his 12/19 vs DET performance, where he managed only 15 points on a cold 7-of-18 from the field. Despite those offensive struggles, he still posted a +7.0 Impact score because he devoured 14 rebounds and relentlessly anchored the defense.

Extreme volatility defined Anthony Davis during this six-game stretch, as he swung wildly from unstoppable offensive force to sudden spectator. He opened the run on 12/24 vs DEN by pouring in 31 points on highly efficient 12-of-19 shooting. That masterful shot selection yielded a massive +31.3 Impact score. Just a day later on 12/25 vs GSW, he vanished. Logging a mere 11 minutes and three points, he posted a -6.6 Impact score because he failed to establish any rhythm during his brief stint. The veteran big man eventually found ways to influence winning even when his touch completely abandoned him. On 01/07 vs SAC, Davis suffered a brutal 7-of-23 shooting night but still salvaged a +10.2 Impact score. He earned that positive mark by hoarding 16 rebounds, generating immense value through sheer hustle and extra possessions.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Davis posts positive impact in 80% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~10 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 72% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Davis consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +17.6, second-half: +14.7. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 20 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Jokić 72.4 poss
FG% 47.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 24
C. Capela 64.2 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 21
D. Queen 45.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.7
PTS 32
A. Drummond 41.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 16
I. Hartenstein 40.2 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 13
D. Ayton 39.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
J. Duren 39.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
S. Barnes 36.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
J. Embiid 33.6 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
N. Claxton 33.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Jokić 68.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.23
PTS 16
C. Capela 60.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
D. Queen 39.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
N. Claxton 39.1 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 14
A. Drummond 39.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Embiid 35.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
J. Duren 35.7 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
D. Ayton 32.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Holmgren 31.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.41
PTS 13
I. Hartenstein 30.9 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

20
Games
20.4
PPG
11.1
RPG
2.8
APG
1.1
SPG
1.6
BPG
50.6
FG%
27.0
3P%
72.8
FT%
31.3
MPG

GAME LOG

20 games played